ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The objectives are to (1) describe disability outcomes at 24 months after injury and (2) identify factors contributing to disability outcomes at 24 months after injury, for Maori and non-Maori who have been hospitalised for injury. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. METHODS: Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study participants were injured New Zealanders aged 18-64 years and recruited from New Zealand's no-fault injury insurer, the Accident Compensation Corporation's entitlement claims register. Data about a number of pre-injury, injury-related and early post-injury characteristics were collected from interviews held at 3 and 24 months after injury. Disability was measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS). Modified Poisson regression modelling was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) of disability for Maori and non-Maori who were hospitalised for injury. RESULTS: Analyses were restricted to 375 Maori and 1824 non-Maori participants for whom complete data were available. Of these, 105 (28%) Maori and 446 (24%) non-Maori were hospitalised for their injury. Of these hospitalised groups, 26% of Maori and 10% of non-Maori were experiencing disability (WHODAS ≥10) at 24 months after injury. Maori who were hospitalised for injury and who were not working for pay before their injury (RR = 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-4.9), who were experiencing disability before their injury (RR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.6-5.8) or who reported trouble accessing healthcare services for their injury (RR = 2.6; 95% CI 1.3-5.2) were independently at increased risk of disability 24 months after injury. Non-Maori who were hospitalised for injury and who had inadequate household income before injury (RR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.4-4.1), less than the secondary school qualifications (RR = 2.0; 95% CI 1.1-3.8), were not working for pay before injury (RR = 2.8; 95% CI 1.5-5.1), were experiencing disability before their injury (RR = 3.0; 95% CI 1.7-5.2), had ≥2 chronic conditions (RR = 3.5; 95% CI 2.0-6.4) or had body mass index ≥30 kg/m2/undisclosed (RR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.3-4.4) were at increased risk of disability 24 months after injury. CONCLUSIONS: Variables predicting disability 24 months after injury for Maori, also predict disability 24 months after injury for non-Maori, with one notable exception-trouble accessing healthcare services. Our findings show that having access to healthcare services for injury plays an important role after injury and must be focussed on to ensure that the burden of poor injury-related outcomes and injury-related inequities are reduced and ultimately eliminated.
Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , New Zealand , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Young AdultABSTRACT
Although seat-belt-induced traffic accident injuries to wearers of pacemakers are rare, about 50,000 pacemaker patients have to "buckle up." A study of 450 pacemaker patients indicated that, as in the general population about 50% use their seat belts. Fifty percent of the patients felt uncomfortable or showed local damage of the area overlying the pacemaker. Studies with dummies revealed a 7-cm upward dislocation of the pacemaker caused by the negative acceleration and by the seat belt itself during the crash. This could be prevented by an external cap protecting the pacemaker.
Subject(s)
Pacemaker, Artificial , Protective Devices , Seat Belts , Thoracic Injuries/prevention & control , Accidents, Traffic , Adult , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Seat Belts/adverse effectsABSTRACT
In the relevant frequency range of about 10 Hertz cars can be considered very largely as Faraday cages and consequently as screens against air-electric fields. This may have a negative influence on driving and reaction patterns as a result. In an extensive investigation 48 subjects in a driving simulator were exposed to definite artificially produced air-electric fields. The self-rating of the performance and concentration of the subjects, reaction times and driving errors were determined. While the reaction times remained practically constant, the driving behavior of the subjects improved.
