ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) organized the Operational Efficiency Working Group in 2008 to develop recommendations for improving the speed with which NCI-sponsored clinical trials move from the idea stage to a protocol open to patient enrollment. METHODS: Given the many stakeholders involved, the Operational Efficiency Working Group advised a multifaceted approach to mobilize the entire research community to improve their business processes. New staff positions to monitor progress, protocol-tracking Web sites, and strategically planned conference calls were implemented. NCI staff and clinical teams at Cooperative Groups and Cancer Centers strived to achieve new target timelines but, most important, agreed to abide by absolute deadlines. For phase I-II studies and phase III studies, the target timelines are 7 months and 10 months, whereas the absolute deadlines were set at 18 and 24 months, respectively. Trials not activated by the absolute deadline are automatically disapproved. RESULTS: The initial experience is encouraging and indicates a reduction in development times for phase I-II studies from the historical median of 541 days to a median of 442 days, an 18.3% decrease. The experience with phase III studies to date, although more limited (n = 25), demonstrates a 45.7% decrease in median days. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon this progress, the NCI and the investigator community have agreed to reduce the absolute deadlines to 15 and 18 months for phase I-II and III trials, respectively. Emphasis on initiating trials rapidly is likely to help reduce the time it takes for clinical trial results to reach patients in need of new treatments.
Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Multicenter Studies as Topic/standards , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Clinical Trials as Topic/trends , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic/standards , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic/standards , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic/methods , Multicenter Studies as Topic/trends , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Time Factors , United StatesABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Belinostat is a hydroxamate class HDAC inhibitor that has demonstrated activity in peripheral T-cell lymphoma and is undergoing clinical trials for non-hematologic malignancies. We studied the pharmacokinetics of belinostat in hepatocellular carcinoma patients to determine the main pathway of metabolism of belinostat. The pharmacokinetics of belinostat in liver cancer patients were characterized by rapid plasma clearance of belinostat with extensive metabolism with more than 4-fold greater relative systemic exposure of major metabolite, belinostat glucuronide than that of belinostat. There was significant interindividual variability of belinostat glucuronidation. The major pathway of metabolism involves UGT1A1-mediated glucuronidation and a good correlation has been identified between belinostat glucuronide formation and glucuronidation of known UGT1A1 substrates. In addition, liver microsomes harboring UGT1A1*28 alleles have lower glucuronidation activity for belinostat compared to those with wildtype UGT1A1. The main metabolic pathway of belinostat is through glucuronidation mediated primarily by UGT1A1, a highly polymorphic enzyme. The clinical significance of this finding remains to be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00321594.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/metabolism , Glucuronosyltransferase/metabolism , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Hydroxamic Acids/pharmacokinetics , Liver Neoplasms/metabolism , Metabolic Networks and Pathways , Sulfonamides/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/enzymology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/genetics , Drug Stability , Gene Expression , Genotype , Glucuronosyltransferase/genetics , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/metabolism , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/toxicity , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Hydroxamic Acids/metabolism , Hydroxamic Acids/toxicity , Kinetics , Liver Neoplasms/enzymology , Liver Neoplasms/genetics , Metabolome , Microsomes, Liver/metabolism , Substrate Specificity , Sulfonamides/metabolism , Sulfonamides/toxicityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program (PPTP) is an initiative supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to identify novel therapeutic agents that may have significant activity against childhood cancers. The PPTP has established panels of childhood cancer xenografts and cell lines to be used for in vivo and in vitro testing. These include panels for Wilms tumor, sarcomas (rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and osteosarcoma), neuroblastoma, brain tumors (glioblastoma, ependymoma, and medulloblastoma), rhabdoid tumors (CNS and renal), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Here, we describe the characteristics of the in vivo tumor panels and report results for the in vivo evaluation of two standard agents, vincristine and cyclophosphamide. PROCEDURES: Solid tumors were grown subcutaneously in immune-deficient mice and tumor dimensions were measured weekly. ALL xenografts were inoculated intravenously and human CD45-positive cells were enumerated weekly. RESULTS: Vincristine-induced objective responses in 6 of 24 (25%) and cyclophosphamide-induced objective responses in 18 of 28 (64%) solid tumor models. Comparable assessments of high levels of activity for these two agents were obtained using a tumor growth delay (TGD) measure. Both agents induced regressions in each of the ALL models evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: We have established 51 solid tumor and 10 ALL in vivo models. The models identify vincristine and cyclophosphamide as having broad-spectrum activity. The PPTP tumor panels appear to generally recapitulate the activity of these agents against specific childhood cancers and to have the potential for identifying novel agents having significant clinical activity.
