Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973727

ABSTRACT

Cell-membrane hybrid nanoparticles (NPs) are designed to improve drug delivery, thermal therapy, and immunotherapy for several diseases. Here, we report the development of distinct biomimetic magnetic nanocarriers containing magnetic nanoparticles encapsulated in vesicles and IR780 near-infrared dyes incorporated in the membranes. Distinct cell membranes are investigated, red blood cell (RBC), melanoma (B16F10), and glioblastoma (GL261). Hybrid nanocarriers containing synthetic lipids and a cell membrane are designed. The biomedical applications of several systems are compared. The inorganic nanoparticle consisted of Mn-ferrite nanoparticles with a core diameter of 15 ± 4 nm. TEM images show many multicore nanostructures (∼40 nm), which correlate with the hydrodynamic size. Ultrahigh transverse relaxivity values are reported for the magnetic NPs, 746 mM-1s-1, decreasing respectively to 445 mM-1s-1 and 278 mM-1s-1 for the B16F10 and GL261 hybrid vesicles. The ratio of relaxivities r2/r1 decreased with the higher encapsulation of NPs and increased for the biomimetic liposomes. Therapeutic temperatures are achieved by both, magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia and photothermal therapy. Photothermal conversion efficiency ∼25-30% are reported. Cell culture revealed lower wrapping times for the biomimetic vesicles. In vivo experiments with distinct routes of nanoparticle administration were investigated. Intratumoral injection proved the nanoparticle-mediated PTT efficiency. MRI and near-infrared images showed that the nanoparticles accumulate in the tumor after intravenous or intraperitoneal administration. Both routes benefit from MRI-guided PTT and demonstrate the multimodal theranostic applications for cancer therapy.

2.
Int J Pharm ; 635: 122682, 2023 Mar 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36754184

ABSTRACT

Three different types of sunitinib-loaded (SUN-loaded) nanocarriers were compared, aiming at the topical treatment of corneal neovascularization (CNV): polymeric nanospheres (NS), liposomes (LIP), and solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN). Three out of eleven formulations prepared for an optimization study - the best SUN-loaded nanocarrier of each assessed type (NS, LIP, and SLN) - were selected, based on their size, polydispersity index (PdI), drug load (DL), and encapsulation efficiency (EE). These three optimal formulations were further characterized by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, and zeta potential. In vitro SUN release profiles were obtained for the optimal formulations, along with ex vivo corneal permeability/retention studies, and ocular tolerance assays, namely: the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay, the HET-CAM test (hen's egg test - chorioallantoic membrane), and hemolytic potential (HP) assay. None of the optimal formulations exhibited toxicity or potential for ocular irritation. SLN showed higher surface fluidity, drug release more suitable for topical ocular applications, besides greater SUN corneal retention. Our results suggest that SLN are the best CNV-targeting SUN-loaded nanocarriers for clinical translation when compared to their NS and LIP analogues.


Subject(s)
Corneal Neovascularization , Nanoparticles , Nanospheres , Animals , Cattle , Female , Corneal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Sunitinib , Chickens , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Polymers , Lipids/chemistry , Drug Carriers/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...