ABSTRACT
RESUMEN Introducción: Se ha comunicado que algunos tratamientos utilizados para la infección por COVID-19 pueden ocasionar alteraciones del intervalo QT y arritmias graves. La medición por electrocardiograma (ECG) convencional requiere personal adicional y riesgo de contagio. Nuevas tecnologías para obtención de un ECG conectados a teléfonos inteligentes (smartphones) proporcionan una alternativa para evaluación del QTc. Objetivo: El objetivo fue evaluar la factibilidad de un dispositivo para registro electrocardiográfico de un canal, para la medición del intervalo QT en pacientes con sospecha o confirmación de infección por COVID-19, antes de recibir drogas que prolongan el intervalo QT. Material y métodos: Se obtuvieron registros de ECG con un dispositivo Kardia Mobile (KM) con trasmisión a un smarthphone. La sección de electrofisiología cardíaca centralizó la recepción por medio electrónico de los ECG en formato de archivo pdf y realizó las mediciones de los intervalos QTm y QTc. Resultados: Se estudiaron 31 pacientes, edad promedio 61 años (rango 20-95 años), sospechosos de presentar infección por COVID-19 enrolados para tratamiento con hidroxicloroquina, azitromicina, ritonavir y lopinavir. Los registros pudieron ser leídos en todos los casos, y debieron repetirse en dos casos. Los valores del intervalo QTc promedio en varones y mujeres fue 423 mseg (rango 380-457 mseg) y 439 mseg (rango 391-540 mseg), respectivamente. El tiempo de respuesta desde el envío del ECG al grupo de análisis fue 11 min (rango 1-155). Conclusiones: Los registros ECG obtenidos con dispositivos KM, para trasmisión a un smartphone a un grupo central de lectura, permitieron la medición del intervalo QTc en todos los pacientes.
ABSTRACT Background: Some therapies used for COVID-19 can prolong the QT interval and produce severe arrhythmias. QT interval measured from a standard electrocardiogram (ECG) requires additional personnel and risk of infection. Novel technologies to obtain an ECG connected to smartphones provide an alternative for the evaluation of corrected QT interval (QTc). Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a single-lead ECG device to measure the QT interval in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 before receiving treatment with drugs that can prolong the QT interval. Methods: The ECG was obtained with a KardiaMobile (KM) device and transmitted to a smartphone. The ECG recordings were saved as pdf files and electronically submitted to the electrophysiology section which centralized the reception and assessed the measured QT and QTc intervals. Results: A total of 31 patients (mean age 61 years, range 20-95 years) with suspected COVID-19 enrolled for treatment with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ritonavir or lopinavir were analyzed. The recordings could be read in all the cases and had to be repeated in two cases. The mean value of the QTc interval was 423 ms (range 380-457 ms) in men and 439 ms (range 391-540 ms) in women. The response time since the ECG recording was submitted for analysis was 11 min (range 1-155). Conclusions: The QTc interval could be measured from ECG recordings obtained with KM devices connected to a smartphone and transmitted to a centralized reading center in all patients.
Subject(s)
Electrocardiography, Ambulatory , Heart Conduction System/physiopathology , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/diagnosis , Ablation Techniques , Accessory Atrioventricular Bundle , Action Potentials , Atrioventricular Block/diagnosis , Atrioventricular Block/physiopathology , Bundle-Branch Block/diagnosis , Bundle-Branch Block/physiopathology , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac , Heart Conduction System/surgery , Heart Rate , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/physiopathology , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Thrombocytosis is frequently observed in patients with malignancy. We undertook this study to determine the prognostic value of thrombocytosis in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer between January 2000 and March 2007. Preoperative platelet count was measured before surgery. Postoperative platelets were determined 1 month after surgery. Two-tailed p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: One hundred sixty three patients with rectal cancer were included in the study. Preoperative platelet count >350,000 was found in 8% of patients. Postoperative platelet count >350,000 was found in 6% of patients. Distant metastases were found in 17 patients (10.4%). Significant variables in the multivariate analyses were preoperative platelets >350,000 (p = 0.001), postoperative platelets >350,000 (p = 0.002), carcinoembryonic antigen >13 ng/dL (p = 0.003). Patients with preoperative platelet count <350,000 showed a 5-year survival rate of 81%, whereas patients with platelet count >350,000 had a 25-month survival [95% confidence interval (CI): 20-26]; p <0.001. Patients with postoperative platelets <350,000 showed a 5-year survival rate of 80%, whereas patients with platelets >350,000 showed a 3-year survival rate of 37.5% (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pre- or postoperative platelet count >350,000 is associated with poor survival in patients with rectal cancer. The measurement of platelets is a clinical marker useful to define the prognosis for patients with rectal cancer.
