Classification and Morphological Variation of the Frontalis Muscle and Implications on the Clinical Practice.

Forehead aesthetics have a major contribution to the youthful appearance of the face. Restoration of the upper facial aesthetics is important to counteract the changes related to the ageing process. The interaction between the frontalis and its antagonists' muscles contributes to the overall aesthetic balance of the forehead. In this study, we evaluated the gross anatomy of the frontalis and classified the muscle according to the morphological appearance. 26 cadavers of Caucasian and South East Asian origin were dissected. The frontalis muscle was dissected without mobilisation, and the gross anatomy and variations were analysed on the backdrop of gender and ethnicity. Our dissection studies revealed three main variations of the muscle based on the extent of interdigitation between the two bellies in the midline. The average length of the muscle was 10.9 cm in males and 9.1 cm in females. The width of the muscle in females was 4 cm at the origin and 6.5 cm at the insertion and in males 4.4 cm at the origin and 5.8 cm at the insertion. In six specimens, the muscle attached only up to the medial two-thirds of the eyebrows. This was predominantly observed in the Caucasians cadavers and may contribute to the constitutional downward slanting eyebrows in some individuals. This study provides an in-depth analysis and classification of the frontalis muscle. Understanding the morphological variation of the muscle helps to amend clinical application and treatment protocols. Evaluation of the patterns of decussation of the frontalis muscle may assist with non-surgical interventions using botulinum toxin in the treatment of forehead rhytids. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Improving balance with wobble board exercises in stroke patients: single-blind, randomized clinical trial.

Background: A primary objective in stroke rehabilitation is to restore functional balance, in order to reduce falls.Objectives: To identify the efficacy and safety of wobble board exercises when combined with conventional physiotherapy, in improving balance in hemiplegic patients following ischemic strokes.Methods: A block-randomized, controlled, observer blinded, superiority trial was conducted on ambulatory hemiplegic patients following ischemic strokes of middle cerebral artery territory. Subjects in the control group received a conventional physiotherapy regime. Subjects in the intervention group received training on a wobble board combined with conventional physiotherapy. Main Outcome measures were the improvement of Four-Square Step Test (FSST) and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), both of which assess functional balance at the end of 6 weeks.Results: Thirty patients were randomly assigned for intervention (n = 15) and control (n = 15) groups. One patient dropped out from the study, leaving 29 eligible for the analysis. Intervention and control groups were comparable in sociodemographic characteristics and pre-test scores of balance. A repeated-measures MANOVA showed a significant difference in improvement of balance between the two study groups after 6 weeks [F(1,28) = 32.6,p = .000; Wilk's lambda = .46]. The improvement of mean score of balance in interventional group was greater than in the control group [BBS:9.5 (intervention group),5.5 (control group); FSST:3.9 (intervention group),1.7 (control group)]. There were no injuries in both groups.Conclusions: Wobble board exercises, when combined with the conventional physiotherapy, are safe and effective in restoring functional balance in patients with hemiplegia following ischemic strokes.

Preserving the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve during submandibular region surgery: a cadaveric safety study.

BACKGROUND: The marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve is vulnerable to iatrogenic injuries during surgeries involving the submandibular region. This leads to significant post-operative morbidity. Studies assessing accurate anatomical landmarks of the marginal mandibular branch are sparse in South Asian countries. Present study was conducted to assess the relationship between the marginal mandibular branch and the inferior border of the body of mandible. METHODS: Twenty-two preserved cadavers of Sri Lankan nationality were selected. Cadavers were positioned dorsal decubitus with necks in extension. The maximum perpendicular distance between the inferior/caudal most ramus of the marginal mandibular branch and the inferior border of the body of the mandible was recorded on both hemi faces. RESULTS: Recorded maximum distance was 17.65 mm on left side and 10.80 mm on right side. Mean maximum distance, was 7.12 ± 2.97 mm. There was no statistically significant difference in the maximum deviation on left (7.84 ± 3.41 mm) and right sides (6.44 ± 2.37 mm). CONCLUSION: Course of the marginal mandibular nerve is complex. If the distance of the incision in the posterior submandibular approach is less than 2 cm from the inferior border of the mandible, there is a high probability of damaging the inferior ramus of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve.

An improved technical trick for identification of the thoracodorsal nerve during axillary clearance surgery: a cadaveric dissection study.

BACKGROUND: Accurate anatomical landmarks to locate the thoracodorsal nerve are important in axillary clearance surgery. METHODS: Twenty axillary dissections were carried out on ten preserved Sri Lankan cadavers. Cadavers were positioned dorsal decubitus with upper limbs abducted to 900. An incision was made in the upper part of the anterior axillary line. The lateral thoracic vein was identified and traced bi-directionally. The anatomical location of the thoracodorsal nerve was studied in relation to the lateral border of pectoralis minor and from a point along the lateral thoracic vein, 2 cm inferior to its confluence with the axillary vein. RESULTS: The lateral thoracic vein was invariably present in all the specimens. All the lateral thoracic veins passed lateral to the lateral border of pectoralis minor except in one specimen, where the lateral thoracic vein passed along its lateral border. The thoracodorsal nerve was consistently present posterolateral to the lateral thoracic vein. The mean distance to the lateral thoracic vein from the lateral border of pectoralis minor was 28.7 ± 12.6 mm. The mean horizontal distance, depth, and displacement, from a point along the lateral thoracic vein, 2 cm inferior to its confluence with the axillary vein to the thoracodorsal nerve were 14.5 ± 8.9 mm, 19.7 ± 7.3 mm and 25 ± 5 mm respectively. The thoracodorsal nerve was found in a posterolateral direction, at a 540 ± 120 angle to the horizontal plane, 95% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: The lateral thoracic vein is an accurate guide to the thoracodorsal nerve. We recommend exploring for the thoracodorsal nerve from a point 2 cm from the confluence of the lateral thoracic vein and the axillary vein for a distance of 25 ± 5 mm in a posterolateral direction, at a 540 ± 120 angle to the horizontal plane.