Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Cardiorenal Med ; 2024 Jun 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38934134

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies exploring the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (pLAAO) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are limited. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyze trends and outcomes following pLAAO in patients with CKD. METHODS: We utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify hospitalizations for pLAAO from 2016-2020 and further identified cases with concomitant CKD. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes were cerebrovascular accidents, major bleeding, vasopressor requirements, percutaneous coronary intervention, cardiac arrest, acute respiratory failure, transfusion, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charges. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to further adjust for covariates. RESULTS: A total of 89,309 pLAAO procedures from 2016 to 2020 were identified, of which 21,559 (24.1%) reported concomitant CKD, with males comprising the majority (62.2%). An increasing trend in pLAAO procedures was seen from 2.24 to 13.9 per 10,000 patients from 2016 to 2020. Despite patients with CKD having a higher rate of most comorbidities, there was no difference in mortality (non-CKD vs. CKD, 0.07% vs. 0.42%; aOR: 1.3, 95% CI: 0.4 - 4.4, p=0.686) and complications for CKD and non-CKD patients, while CKD patients had longer LOS and higher total hospital charge. No significant sex differences in outcomes among CKD patients were observed except for a longer LOS in females. CONCLUSION: Despite generally having more comorbidities, outcomes of patients with CKD following pLAAO are similar to those without CKD, suggesting that pLAAO can be offered as a safe option for the treatment of AF in eligible patients with CKD.

2.
Am Heart J Plus ; 43: 100408, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38882592

ABSTRACT

Background: Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors (SMuRF) such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking have long been established in the etiology of atherosclerotic disease. Studies suggest that patients without any of these risk factors (SMuRF-less) who present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction have worse outcomes. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample databases (2016 to 2020) was queried to identify STEMI admissions as a principal diagnosis using ICD 10 codes. The study population aged 18 to 45 years were divided into cohorts of SMuRF and SMuRF-less based on the presence of ≥1 risk factor (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and smoking), and in-hospital outcomes were compared. Results: 41,990 patients were identified as the final study population. 38,495 patients were identified as SMuRF, and 3495 patients were SMuRF-less. Compared to SMuRF patients, SMuRF-less patients are more likely to be females (23.2 % vs. 21.2 %), have congestive heart failure (16.6 % vs. 13.7 %, p < 0.01) but less likely to have obesity (13.7 % vs 28.0 %, p < 0.01) In evaluating outcomes, SMuRF-less patients had higher adjusted in-hospital mortality (aOR 2.6, CI 1.5-4.2, p < 0.01), Cardiogenic shock (aOR 1.8, CI 1.3-2.5, p < 0.01), acute kidney injury (aOR 1.4, CI 1.0-1.9, p = 0.02), and Extramembrane Corporeal Oxygenation (aOR 4.1, CI 1.1-15.1, p = 0.03). Fluid and electrolyte abnormalities was an independent predictor of mortality among SMuRF-less patients (aOR 3.82, CI 1.3-11.2, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Young patients who present with STEMI and have no traditional cardiovascular risk factors have worse in-hospital outcomes. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of non-traditional risk factors on acute myocardial infarction.

3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 105: 106-124, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583765

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This review article provides an updated review of a relatively common pathology with various manifestations. Superficial venous diseases (SVDs) are a broad spectrum of venous vascular disease that predominantly affects the body's lower extremities. The most serious manifestation of this disease includes varicose veins, chronic venous insufficiency, stasis dermatitis, venous ulcers, superficial venous thrombosis, reticular veins, and spider telangiectasias. METHODS: The anatomy, pathophysiology, and risk factors of SVD were discussed during this review. The risk factors for developing SVD were related to race, age, sex, lifestyle, and certain genetic conditions as well as comorbid deep vein thrombosis. Various classification systems were listed, focusing on the most common one-the revised Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology classification. The clinical features including history and physical examination findings elicited in SVD were outlined. RESULTS: Imaging modalities utilized in SVD were highlighted. Duplex ultrasound is the first line in evaluating SVD but magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography venography, plethysmography, and conventional venography are feasible options in the event of an ambiguous venous duplex ultrasound study. Treatment options highlighted in this review ranged from conservative treatment with compression stockings, which could be primary or adjunctive to pharmacologic topical and systemic agents such as azelaic acid, diuretics, plant extracts, medical foods, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anticoagulants and skin substitutes for different stages of SVD. Interventional treatment modalities include thermal ablative techniques like radiofrequency ablationss, endovenous laser ablation, endovenous steam ablation, and endovenous microwave ablation as well as nonthermal strategies such as the Varithena (polidocanol microfoam) sclerotherapy, VenaSeal (cyanoacrylate) ablation, and Endovenous mechanochemical ablation. Surgical treatments are also available and include debridement, vein ligation, stripping, and skin grafting. CONCLUSIONS: SVDs are prevalent and have varied manifestations predominantly in the lower extremities. Several studies highlight the growing clinical and financial burden of these diseases. This review provides an update on the pathophysiology, classification, clinical features, and imaging findings as well as the conservative, pharmacological, and interventional treatment options indicated for different SVD pathologies. It aims to expedite the timely deployment of therapies geared toward reducing the significant morbidity associated with SVD especially varicose veins, venous ulcers, and venous insufficiency, to improve the quality of life of these patients and prevent complications.


Subject(s)
Varicose Veins , Humans , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Varicose Veins/therapy , Varicose Veins/physiopathology , Varicose Veins/epidemiology , Venous Insufficiency/therapy , Venous Insufficiency/physiopathology , Venous Insufficiency/epidemiology , Venous Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Veins/physiopathology , Veins/diagnostic imaging , Predictive Value of Tests
4.
Curr Opin Cardiol ; 39(4): 244-250, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567924

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review article discusses the controversies, strengths, and limitations of the current literature on renal artery denervation in the management of resistant hypertension, as well as the future directions of this intervention. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been conflicting data from the different randomized control trials assessing the efficacy of renal artery denervation in the management of resistant hypertension. SUMMARY: Renal artery denervation is achieved by ablating the sympathetic nerves surrounding the renal arteries using endovascular ultrasound, radiofrequency, or alcohol. Our review article highlights that renal artery denervation is generally effective in improving blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved the ReCor Medical Paradise system, and the Symplicity Spyral RDN systems for renal artery denervation.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Renal Artery , Sympathectomy , Humans , Renal Artery/innervation , Sympathectomy/methods , Hypertension/surgery , Catheter Ablation/methods , Blood Pressure/physiology
5.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(6): 102541, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38521289

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, contributing to approximately 1 in 8 deaths. Individuals with end-stage HF (eHF) experience debilitating symptoms leading to poor quality of life (QoL). METHODS: We used the ICD-10 code for eHF (I5084) from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) (2016-2020) to identify all patients with eHF. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to adjust for confounders and estimate the mortality probability in each arrhythmia cohort. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality risk in each group. A p-value of 0.05 was deemed significant. RESULTS: There were 22,703 hospitalizations with eHF (mean age 67 years ±16). Men represented 66.5 % (15,091) of the population. In this cohort, 59 % (13,018) were Caucasians, 27.2 % (6,017) were Blacks, 8.7 % (1,924) were Hispanics, and 2.9 % (505) were Asians. Of these individuals, 50.4 % (11,434) had atrial fibrillation (AFIB). The majority of the arrhythmia subgroups had independent associations with mortality, with adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for VFIB 5.8 (4.6-7.1), AFIB 4.3 (3.9-4.5), SVT 1.9 (1.6-2.4), and VT 1.2 (1.1-1.4), p < 0.0001, each. CONCLUSION: This analysis revealed that approximately half of the hospitalized population with end-stage heart failure are burdened with atrial fibrillation. Ventricular and atrial fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia, and ventricular tachycardia each carried an independent mortality risk, with ventricular fibrillation having the highest risk.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Heart Failure , Hospital Mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/mortality , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38531708

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The risk of coronary artery disease is exaggerated in patients with autoimmune diseases (AID). A higher risk of complications has been reported during and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in these patients. We aimed to analyze the in-hospital outcomes and trends of patients with AID, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergoing PCI. METHOD: We identified all PCI procedures using the National In-patient Sample database from 2016 to 2020. Stratified them into cohorts with RA, SLE and IBD and compared them to cohorts without AID. The Chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression were used for analysis. A p-value <0.005 was considered statistically significant. RESULT: We identified 2,367,475 patients who underwent PCI. Of these, 1.6 %, 0.5 %, and 0.4 % had RA, IBD and SLE respectively. The odds of mortality were lower among patients with IBD (aOR: 0.56; CI 0.38-0.81, p = 0.002) but patients with RA had higher odds of having composite major complications [(MC) including cerebrovascular accident (CVA), cardiac arrest, acute heart failure (AHF), ventricular arrhythmia (VA), major bleeding, and acute kidney injury (AKI)] (aOR: 0.90; CI 0.83-0.98, p = 0.013). Our SLE cohort had higher rates of CVA (p = 0.017) and AKI (p = 0.002). Our cohort with IBD had lower rates of cardiac arrest but had longer hospital length of stay (4.9 days vs 3.9 days) and they incurred higher hospital charges compared to cohort without IBD. CONCLUSION: This study depicts the immediate adverse outcomes observed in patients with AID undergoing PCI. In contrast to those without AID, our cohorts with RA exhibited worse outcomes, as indicated by the higher odds of major complications. IBD is associated with lower risks of in-hospital adverse outcomes but with higher resource utilization.

8.
Int J Cardiol ; 399: 131669, 2024 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38141727

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valvular replacement (TAVR) improves outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). However, data describing racial disparities in the utilization and outcomes of TAVR are limited. We aimed to evaluate the utilization trends and outcomes of TAVR across racial and ethnic groups. METHODS: All patients who underwent TAVR in the United States from 2016 through 2020 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database. Patients were classified according to their racial and ethnic groups as Non-Hispanic White (NHW), Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, and Asian. We assessed racial and ethnic differences in the outcomes of TAVR using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, insurance, income, hospital location and teaching status, bed size, region, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: Of the 280,290 patients who underwent TAVR, 89.5% were NHW, 4.24% were NHB, 4.9% were Hispanic, and 1.39% were Asian people. In 2016, the rates of all-TAVR procedures were 1.48 per 1000 patients among NHW group but 0.39 in NHB, 0.4 in Hispanic, and 0.47 in the Asian group. A steep rise was noted in the rate of TAVR among NHW but not in the NHB, Hispanic, and Asian groups. NHB patients had lower mortality rates (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR]: 0.56; CI 0.35-0.88 p = 0.014) compared to their NHW counterparts. CONCLUSION: The racial and ethnic gap in the utilization of TAVR widened during the study period with minority groups being disproportionately less likely to receive TAVR. NHB patients who received TAVR had lower mortality rates than NHW.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Healthcare Disparities , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Black or African American , Ethnicity , Hispanic or Latino , Racial Groups , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , White , Asian
9.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(1 Pt C): 102140, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37858845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The management of cardiogenic shock (CS) requires attentiveness to details and in some cases, invasive interventions. In the past, studies have shown relationships between the day of admission and cardiovascular outcomes. We aim to analyze the trends and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted with CS over the weekends compared to weekdays. METHOD: We identified all patients with CS from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 2016 and 2020. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, baseline demographics and in-hospital outcomes were obtained and compared by weekend or weekday admission. RESULTS: Out of 854,684 CS admissions, 199,255 (23.6%) occurred on weekends. Patients admitted over the weekend had worse outcomes, including higher rates of mortality (aOR 1.09 CI 1.05 - 1.11, p<0.001), cardiac arrest (aOR 1.09 CI 1.04 -1.14, p<0.001), and respiratory failure. We also noted higher percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates (aOR 1.2 CI 1.16 - 1.25, p<0.001) but lower rates of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) and post-procedure pneumothorax. Weekend admissions had shorter hospital lengths of stay, and they incurred lower charges ($223,222 vs. $247,908). Between 2016 and 2020, we observed a consistent downward trend in the mortality rates of the weekend and weekday CS admissions, with consistently higher weekend than weekday admissions. CONCLUSION: Weekend admissions for CS are associated with worse outcomes, which have persisted for years. This now begs the question of whether physician dissatisfaction, understaffing, or burn-out are responsible for this finding.


Subject(s)
Patient Admission , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Shock, Cardiogenic/epidemiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Hospital Mortality , Time Factors , Hospitals
10.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(1 Pt B): 102083, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37717860

ABSTRACT

Obesity has been identified as a significant factor contributing to the development of numerous cardiovascular conditions and as a result, the cardiovascular community has prioritized efforts to address obesity and reduce its associated risks. However, despite these efforts, the prevalence of obesity continues to rise steadily, and is projected to double in the upcoming years. Atrial fibrillation is among the most prevalent and extensively researched cardiovascular comorbidities associated with obesity. Several mechanisms have been postulated, including scar tissue formation and fat deposition, which ultimately leads to atrial remodeling and subsequent arrhythmogenesis. Numerous strategies have been implemented to prevent and manage obesity, encompassing lifestyle adjustments, dietary modifications, pharmacological treatments, and surgical interventions. Bariatric surgery has garnered significant recognition over the years due to its promising outcomes, including a decrease in the overall prevalence of atrial fibrillation and other cardiovascular comorbidities in general in obese patients. This study focuses on the current trends regarding the impact of bariatric surgery on obese patients with atrial fibrillation.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Bariatric Surgery , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Prevalence , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/surgery , Comorbidity
11.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 48(11): 101908, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37399856

ABSTRACT

Heart Failure (HF) is a common comorbidity in the United state. COVID-19 infection has shown worse clinical outcomes among heart failure patients; however, there is limited evidence on the impact of COVID-19 infection on the subset of HF. Hence, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection without HF vs concomitant COVID-19 infection with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (AD-HFpEF) vs concomitant COVID-19 Infection with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (AD-HFrEF) using a large dataset illustrating a real word analysis. A retrospective study design of hospitalizations using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database registry 2020 with a principal diagnosis of adult patients (≥18 years) hospitalized with COVID-19 infection as principal diagnosis using ICD-10 codes stratified to COVID-19 infection without HF vs COVID-19 infection with AD-HFpEF vs COVID-19 infection with AD-HFrEF. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic, linear, poisson, and Cox regression models were used for analysis. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 1,050,045 COVID-19 infection cases were included in this study, out of which 1,007,860 (98.98%) had only COVID-19 infection without HF, while 20,550 (1.96%) had COVID-19 infection with Acute Decompensated HFpEF, and 21,675 (2.06%) had COVID-19 infection with Acute Decompensated HFrEF. Our study shows that patients with COVID-19 infection and AD-HFrEF had the highest in-hospital mortality rate (25.4%). Using COVID-19 infection without HF with a mortality of 10.6% as a reference, COVID-19 infection with AD-HFpEF with a 22.5% mortality rate (95% CI 2.3-2.6, aOR; 2.4) and COVID-19 infection with AD-HFrEF with 25.4% mortality rate (95% CI 2.7-3.1, aOR; 2.9). Acute Decompensated HF with concurrent COVID-19 infection is associated with higher in-hospital mortality, with higher in-hospital mortality outcome observed among COVID 19 infection with concurrent AD-HFrEF.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Failure , Adult , Humans , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Prognosis , Stroke Volume , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology
12.
Cureus ; 15(4): e38087, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37252546

ABSTRACT

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular mortality, and it is caused by a diverse array of conditions. Among these is commotio cordis, a relatively infrequent but still significant cause, often seen in young athletes involved in competitive or recreational sports. It is known to be caused by blunt trauma to the chest wall resulting in life-threatening arrhythmia (typically ventricular fibrillation). The current understanding pertains to blunt trauma to the precordium, with an outcome depending on factors such as the type of stimulus, the force of impact, the qualities of the projectile (shape, size, and density), the site of impact, and the timing of impact in relation to the cardiac cycle. In the management of commotio cordis, a history of preceding blunt chest trauma is usually encountered. Imaging is mostly unremarkable except for ECG, which may show malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Treatment is focused on emergent resuscitation with the advanced cardiac life support protocol algorithm, with extensive workup following the return of spontaneous circulation. In the absence of underlying cardiovascular pathologies, implantable cardiac defibrillator insertion is not beneficial, and patients can even resume physical activity if the workup is unremarkable. Proper follow-up is also key in the management and monitoring of re-entrant ventricular arrhythmias, which are amenable to ablative therapy. Prevention of this condition involves protecting the chest wall against blunt trauma, especially with the use of safety balls and chest protectors in certain high-risk sporting activities.  This study aims to elucidate the current epidemiology and clinical management of SCD with a particular focus on a rarely explored etiology, commotio cordis.

13.
Cureus ; 15(3): e35966, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37041912

ABSTRACT

Tobacco smoking is a chief cause of preventable deaths worldwide, accounting for various cancers, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. Tobacco smoking accounts for more than seven million deaths every year. Worldwide statistics show that about 1.1 billion active smokers exist; 80% live in low- and middle-income countries. Nicotine is the addictive ingredient with the least harm compared to other active ingredients in tobacco, albeit not completely benign. Nicotine acts on the nicotinic cholinergic receptors (nAChRs) and produces the release of neurotransmitters. The mechanism by which it affects the cardiovascular system involves endothelial dysfunction by reducing nitrogen monoxide production, pro-thrombotic conditions, and activating inflammatory routes. These factors, along with the increased amounts of coronary atherosclerosis, have addictive adverse effects. Smoking has been shown to cause increased amounts of coronary atherosclerosis which may be responsible for the increased risk of hypertension, coronary heart disease, and atrial fibrillation, potentially contributing to the association of current smokers with a higher incidence of heart failure. This has led to worsened burdens and outcomes of cardiovascular disease among smokers. Smoking cessation has been associated with a reduction in cardiovascular mortality. This ranges from the reduction in the incidence of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and heart failure. As regards behavioral and mental health, smoking cessation reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease in people experiencing mental illness. The prevalence of smoking continues to trend downward over the past couple of decades. Despite this downtrend, cigarette smoking is responsible for approximately half a million deaths per year in the United States and billions of dollars spent in healthcare. This buttresses the need to explore the various effects of smoking cessation on cardiovascular health and suggest ways to curb the disease burden.

14.
Am Heart J Plus ; 34: 100318, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38510954

ABSTRACT

Study objective: Pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality rates in the United States are rising despite advances in knowledge, technology, and healthcare delivery. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of adverse pregnancy outcomes, with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) being a potential contributor to the worse outcomes in pregnancy. Design/setting: We analyzed data from the national inpatient sample database to examine trends in the incidence and in-hospital outcomes of myocardial infarction in pregnancy from 2016 to 2020. Participants: Using ICD-10-CM codes, we identified all admissions from a pregnancy-related encounter with a diagnosis of type 1 AMI. Main outcome: Using the marginal effect of years, we assessed the trends in the incidence of AMI and utilized a multivariate logistic regression model to compare our secondary outcomes. Results: Of the 19,524,846 patients with an obstetric-related admission, 3605 (0.02 %) had a diagnosis of type 1 AMI. Overall, we observed an approximately 2-fold increase in the trend of AMI from 1.4 to 2.5 per 10,000 obstetric admissions, with the highest incidence trend of 2.5 to 5.2 per 10,000 obstetric admissions seen in Black patients. Among patients diagnosed with AMI, we found significantly higher rates of in-hospital mortality (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 22.9, 12.2-42.8), cardiogenic shock (AOR:54.3, 33.9-86.6), preeclampsia (AOR: 2.2, 1.65-2.94) and spontaneous abortion (AOR:6.3, 3.71-10.6). Conclusion: Over the 5-year period, we found increasing trends in the incidence of AMI in pregnancy, especially among Black patients. Incident AMI was also associated with worse pregnancy outcomes.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...