Real-world study on microsatellite instability and mismatch repair deficiency testing patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain.

PURPOSE: Clinical practice guidelines recommend that all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) should be tested for mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H). We aimed to describe the dMMR/MSI-H testing practice in patients with mCRC in Spanish centers. METHODS: Multicenter, observational retrospective study that included patients newly diagnosed with mCRC or who progressed to a metastatic stage from early/localized stages. RESULTS: Three hundred patients were included in the study from May 2020 through May 2021, with a median age of 68 years, and two hundred twenty-five (75%) had stage IV disease at initial diagnosis; two hundred eighty-four patients received first-line treatment, and dMMR/MSI-H testing was performed in two hundred fifty-one (84%) patients. The results of the dMMR/MSI-H tests were available in 61 (24%) of 251 patients before the diagnosis of metastatic disease and in 191 (81%) of 236 evaluable patients for this outcome before the initiation of first-line treatment. Among the 244 patients who were tested for dMMR/MSI-H with IHC or PCR, 14 (6%) were MMR deficient. The most frequent type of first-line treatment was the combination of chemotherapy and biological agent, that was received by 71% and 50% of patients with MMR proficient and deficient tumors, respectively, followed by chemotherapy alone, received in over 20% of patients in each subgroup. Only 29% of dMMR/MSI-H tumors received first-line immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that a high proportion of patients with mCRC are currently tested for dMMR/MSI-H in tertiary hospitals across Spain. However, there is still room for improvement until universal testing is achieved. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Advances in the Treatment of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: Are we Moving Forward?

Poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas are aggressive neoplasms of challenging clinical management. A small proportion of patients with early-stage disease may achieve long-term survival, but the majority of patients present with rapidly lethal metastatic disease. Current standard of care still follows the treatment paradigm of small cell lung cancer, a far more common G3 neuroendocrine neoplasm, although emerging molecular and clinical data increasingly question this approach. In this article, we will briefly summarize epidemiology and prognosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas to emphasize the very low incidence, aggressive nature, and orphan status of this tumor entity. We will also discuss the current pathological classification and its limitations, as well as recent data on their differential biological background compared with small cell lung cancer, and its potential implications for patients care. Then, we will review the standard of care of systemic therapy, basically focused on platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy, including some recent randomized trials providing evidence regarding efficacy of irinotecan vs etoposide platinum doublets. Finally, we will present a comprehensive overview of novel therapeutic strategies in current clinical development, including recently reported data on immunotherapy, tumor-agnostic therapies (microsatellite instability, high tumor mutational burden, NTRK and RET gene fusions, BRAF or KRAS inhibitors), and additional treatment strategies targeting other tumor vulnerabilities (ie, Notch pathway, novel targets for radioligand therapy), and provide some insights regarding unmet needs and future perspectives to improve patient's care and prognosis.

MicroRNA signature and integrative omics analyses define prognostic clusters and key pathways driving prognosis in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are mutationally quiet (low number of mutations/Mb), and epigenetic mechanisms drive their development and progression. We aimed at comprehensively characterising the microRNA (miRNA) profile of NENs, and exploring downstream targets and their epigenetic modulation. In total, 84 cancer-related miRNAs were analysed in 85 NEN samples from lung and gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) origin, and their prognostic value was evaluated by univariate and multivariate models. Transcriptomics (N = 63) and methylomics (N = 30) were performed to predict miRNA target genes, signalling pathways and regulatory CpG sites. Findings were validated in The Cancer Genome Atlas cohorts and in NEN cell lines. We identified a signature of eight miRNAs that stratified patients in three prognostic groups (5-year survival of 80%, 66% and 36%). Expression of the eight-miRNA gene signature correlated with 71 target genes involved in PI3K-Akt and TNFα-NF-kB signalling. Of these, 28 were associated with survival and validated in silico and in vitro. Finally, we identified five CpG sites involved in the epigenetic regulation of these eight miRNAs. In brief, we identified an 8-miRNA signature able to predict survival of patients with GEP and lung NENs, and identified genes and regulatory mechanisms driving prognosis in NEN patients.

Chemotherapy in NEN: still has a role?

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise a broad spectrum of tumors with widely variable biological and clinical behavior. Primary tumor site, extent of disease, tumor differentiation and expression of so matostatin receptors, proliferation and growth rates are the major prognostic factors that determine the therapeutic strategy. Treatment options for advanced disease have considerably expanded in recent years, particularly for well differentiated tumors (NETs). Novel drugs approved over the past decade in this context include somatostatin analogues and 177Lu-oxodotreotide for somatostatin-receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs, sunitinib for pancreatic NETs (P-NETs), and everolimus for P-NETs and non-functioning lung or gastrointestinal NETs. Nevertheless, chemotherapy remains an essential component of the treatment armamentarium of patients with NENs, particularly of patients with P-NETs or those with bulky, symptomatic or rapidly progressive tumors (generally G3 or high-G2 NENs). In this manuscript we will comprehensively review available evidence related to the use of chemotherapy in lung and GEP NENs and will critically discuss its role in the treatment algorithm of this family of neoplasms.

Targeted Cancer Therapy: What's New in the Field of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous family of neoplasms of increasing incidence and high prevalence due to their relatively indolent nature. Their wide anatomic distribution and their characteristic ability to secrete hormonally active substances pose unique challenges for clinical management. They are also characterized by the common expression of somatostatin receptors, a target that has been extremely useful for diagnosis and treatment (i.e., somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)). Chemotherapy is of limited use for NETs of non-pancreatic origin, and the only approved targeted agents for advanced progressive NETs are sunitinib for those of pancreatic origin, and everolimus for lung, gastrointestinal and pancreatic primaries. Despite recent therapeutic achievements, thus, systemic treatment options remain limited. In this review we will discuss the state-of-the-art targeted therapies in the field of NETs, and also future perspectives of novel therapeutic drugs or strategies in clinical development, including recently presented results from randomized trials of yet unapproved antiangiogenic agents (i.e., pazopanib, surufatinib and axitinib), PRRT including both approved radiopharmaceuticals (177Lu-Oxodotreotide) and others in development (177Lu-Edotreotide, 177Lu-Satoreotide Tetraxetan), immunotherapy and other innovative targeted strategies (antibody-drug conjugates, bites,…) that shall soon improve the landscape of personalized treatment options in NET patients.

Síndrome de encefalopatía posterior reversible asociado a quimioterapia. Gemcitabina como agente causal / Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome associated to chemotherapy. Gemcitabine as the causative agent

No disponible