Rehabilitation Modulates High-Order Interactions Among Large-Scale Brain Networks in Subacute Stroke.

The recovery of motor functions after stroke is fostered by the functional integration of large-scale brain networks, including the motor network (MN) and high-order cognitive controls networks, such as the default mode (DMN) and executive control (ECN) networks. In this paper, electroencephalography signals are used to investigate interactions among these three resting state networks (RSNs) in subacute stroke patients after motor rehabilitation. A novel metric, the O-information rate (OIR), is used to quantify the balance between redundancy and synergy in the complex high-order interactions among RSNs, as well as its causal decomposition to identify the direction of information flow. The paper also employs conditional spectral Granger causality to assess pairwise directed functional connectivity between RSNs. After rehabilitation, a synergy increase among these RSNs is found, especially driven by MN. From the pairwise description, a reduced directed functional connectivity towards MN is enhanced after treatment. Besides, inter-network connectivity changes are associated with motor recovery, for which the mediation role of ECN seems to play a relevant role, both from pairwise and high-order interactions perspective.

Measuring the agreement between brain connectivity networks.

Investigating the level of similarity between two brain networks, resulting from measures of effective connectivity in the brain, can be of interest from many respects. In this study, we propose and test the idea to borrow measures of association used in machine learning to provide a measure of similarity between the structure of (un-weighted) brain connectivity networks. The measures here explored are the accuracy, Cohen's Kappa (K) and Area Under Curve (AUC). We implemented two simulation studies, reproducing two contexts of application that can be particularly interesting for practical applications, namely: i) in methodological studies, performed on surrogate data, aiming at comparing the estimated network with the corresponding ground-truth network; ii) in applications to real data, when it is necessary to compare the structure of a network obtained in a specific subject with a reference (e.g. a baseline condition or normative data). In the simulations, the level of similarity between two networks was manipulated through different factors. We then investigated the effect of such manipulations on the measures of association. Results showed how the three parameters modulated their values according to the level of similarity between the two networks. In particular, the AUC provided the better performances in terms of its capability to synthetize the similarity between two networks, showing high dynamic and sensitivity.