ABSTRACT
Objectives: Secondary prevention of stroke largely depends on risk factor control and lifestyle modification. Optimal secondary prevention strategies are limited in rural settings due to the shortage of primary care physicians and neurologists. Awareness of community health workers (CHWs) regarding stroke and its management remains largely unexplored. The current cross-sectional study aimed at assessing the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of CHWs regarding stroke care. Materials and Methods: A structured KAP questionnaire was administered among 510 CHWs from randomly selected rural health blocks of Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Results: Knowledge assessment showed that the CHWs possessed an average knowledge of stroke care. The mean attitude and practice scores were higher, indicating a favorable attitude and good practice. The overall mean (standard deviation) KAP scores of CHWs were 13.54 (4.43) against a total score of 23. The KAP scores were highest among palliative care nurses. The stroke awareness of the accredited social health activists was comparatively lower than other CHWs. Factors such as age and years of work experience were not correlated to the KAP scores. Conclusion: Recurrent strokes remain a major challenge in primary care. Overall, the health workers demonstrated average knowledge, favorable attitudes, and positive practices. The study highlights the importance of training accredited social health activists (ASHAs) and other CHWs in stroke to improve secondary prevention strategies.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Increasing stroke burden in developing countries necessitates measures to strengthen health systems. We aimed to evaluate whether a Community Health Worker (CHW) based educational intervention will improve risk factor control among stroke survivors and enhance behavior change communication. METHOD: An open-label, cluster-randomized trial was conducted in rural area of Thiruvananthapuram district, Kerala from December 2017 to December 2018. A CHW-based educational intervention in addition to standard of care was provided in intervention arm and compared to standard clinical care in the control arm with follow-up at three and six months. The primary outcome measures were risk factor control and quality of behavior change communication provided by CHWs. RESULTS: Of the 234 Stroke/TIA survivors enrolled, the mean age (SD) was 59.43 (11.07) years. At 6-month follow up, all patients with smokeless tobacco consumption had quit in the intervention arm (5 at baseline and 0 at six months) and no relapse in smoking was found (as compared to control arm wherein 9 at baseline and one at 6 months). The control of hypertension and diabetes was not significant at 3 months and 6 months in both intervention and control groups. Home visits as well as health education on risk factors by CHWs in the intervention arm were significantly higher. CONCLUSION: Community health worker-based intervention is feasible in resource constrained settings for secondary stroke prevention. Training of CHW on risk factor control and lifestyle modifications for stroke survivors enhances quality of health education provided by health services.
