ABSTRACT
Background: Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia may reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. We designed a randomized double blinded pilot study with two objectives: 1) to explore potential benefits of spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia and 2) to provide power and sample size estimations for potential differences between the groups. Primary outcome measures were postoperative pain and oral morphine equivalent (OMEq) consumption. Methods: Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation at the University Hospital of North Norway were randomised to spinal (n=5) or a sham spinal procedure (n=5). Numeric rating scale (NRS) and OMEq were monitored postoperatively for 72 h. Results: Age, sex, body mass index, and ASA were not significantly different between the groups. During surgery, patients in the spinal group received less remifentanil (p=0.06). NRS was lower in the spinal group 1 hr after admittance to the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) (p=0.06) and on the first postoperative day at 8 AM (p=0.03). OMEq consumption in the PACU was lower in the spinal group (p=0.008), but no differences between the groups were detected after discharge to the ward. Sample size estimations revealed that eight patients in each group would be needed to study potential NRS differences after admission to the PACU and 23 patients in each group to study potential differences in OMEq consumption on day 1. Conclusion: Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. Data from the current study should be followed up by a sufficiently powered randomized controlled trial. Clinical Trial Registration: Trial registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05406765).
ABSTRACT
Pneumothorax is an infrequent complication of laparoscopic surgery. Most cases occur during upper abdominal surgery, since a head-down position (Trendelenburg) pushes the liver and peritoneum against the diaphragm, reducing gas release. When it is due to CO2 diffusion across congenital diaphragmatic defects, it usually resolves itself spontaneously after de-insufflation of the pneumoperitoneum. Increasing positive end-expiratory pressure to counteract intra-abdominal pressure is an effective measure when a pulmonary origin is excluded. We report a case of right-sided hypertensive capnothorax due to a diaphragmatic defect, during lower abdominal surgery, which was successfully managed without the need for chest drainage. This case highlights the importance of maintaining active vigilance and a high index of suspicion for pneumothorax during laparoscopic surgery.
O pneumotórax é uma complicação pouco frequente da cirurgia laparoscópica. A maioria dos casos ocorrem em cirurgias da região abdominal superior, uma vez que a posição de Trendelenburg por empurrar o fígado e o peritoneu contra o diafragma, reduz a perda de gás. Quando a causa é a difusão de CO2 através de um defeito diafragmático congénito, habitualmente resolve espontaneamente, após a desinsuflação do pneumoperitoneu. Quando se exclui uma causa parenquimatosa pulmonar o aumento de positive end-expiratory pressure para contrabalançar a pressão intra-abdominal é uma medida eficaz. O caso clínico que apresentamos refere-se a um caso de capnotórax hipertensivo que ocorreu devido à presença de um defeito diafragmático congénito, durante uma cirurgia abdominal inferior e que foi tratado com sucesso sem recorrer ao uso de dreno torácico. Este caso salienta a importância de manter uma vigilância ativa e alto indice de suspeição para o pneumotórax durante a cirurgia laparoscópica.
