Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Haemophilia ; 23(5): 682-688, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28440005

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although the regular replacement of clotting factor concentrates (prophylaxis) has been well established as the standard of care for severe haemophilia, the high cost of factor concentrates has limited access to prophylaxis in countries with under-developed or developing economies. AIMS: We studied the health gap that could be addressed by providing unlimited access to clotting factor concentrates with implementation of long-term prophylaxis initiated from an early age in life. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of a random, representative sample of boys with moderate and severe haemophilia at three haemophilia treatment centres in Sao Paulo, Brazil, and one centre in Toronto, Canada. RESULTS: Canadian subjects were more often treated with prophylaxis, and began treatment at an earlier age. Fewer Canadian subjects had bleeds within the preceding 6 months (19 vs. 34, P = 0.003). Canadian subjects had lower (better) Pettersson radiographic scores (1.5 vs. 6.0, P = 0.0016), lower (better) Hemophilia Joint Health Scores (5.5 vs. 10.5, P = 0.0038), higher (better) Activity Scale for Kids scores (96.6 vs. 92.0, P = 0.033), more time spent in vigorous activity, and higher (better) social participation scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that increasing access to clotting factor concentrates for young boys with severe haemophilia is a global imperative.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Developing Countries , Health Resources , Hemophilia A/epidemiology , Adolescent , Brazil/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Status Indicators , Hemophilia A/diagnosis , Hemophilia A/therapy , Humans , Male , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index
2.
Haemophilia ; 20(1): 65-72, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23910578

ABSTRACT

Factor replacement therapy for the treatment of moderate to severe haemophilia A and B can be complicated by the production of inhibitory alloantibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX. Treatment with the nanofiltered anti-inhibitor coagulant complex, Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA NF), is a key therapeutic option for controlling acute haemorrhages in patients with high-titre inhibitors or low-titre inhibitors refractory to replacement therapy. Given the high risk for morbidity and mortality in haemophilia patients with inhibitors to FVIII or FIX, we conducted this Phase 3 prospective study to evaluate whether prophylaxis with FEIBA NF is a safe and effective treatment option. Over a 1-year period, 17 subjects were treated prophylactically (85 ± 15 U kg(-1) every other day) while 19 subjects were treated on demand. The median (IQR) annualized bleeding rate (ABR) during prophylaxis was 7.9 (8.1), compared to 28.7 (32.3) during on-demand treatment, which amounts to a 72.5% reduction and a statistically significant difference in ABRs between arms (P = 0.0003). Three (17.6%) subjects (ITT) on prophylaxis experienced no bleeding episodes, whereas none treated on demand were bleeding episode-free. Total utilization of FEIBA NF for the treatment of bleeding episodes was significantly higher during on-demand therapy than prophylaxis (P = 0.0067). There were no differences in the rates of related adverse events between arms. This study demonstrates that FEIBA prophylaxis significantly reduces all types of bleeding compared with on-demand treatment, and the safety of prophylaxis is comparable to that of on-demand treatment.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Factors/therapeutic use , Factor IX/therapeutic use , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia B/drug therapy , Premedication , Adolescent , Adult , Blood Coagulation Factor Inhibitors , Blood Coagulation Factors/administration & dosage , Blood Coagulation Factors/adverse effects , Child , Factor IX/administration & dosage , Factor IX/adverse effects , Factor VIII/administration & dosage , Factor VIII/adverse effects , Hemophilia A/blood , Hemophilia A/complications , Hemophilia B/blood , Hemophilia B/complications , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Haemophilia ; 9(5): 573-7, 2003 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14511296

ABSTRACT

Intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in haemophilic patients. The overall incidence of ICH has been reported to range from 2.2% to 7.5% in patients with haemophilia. From 1987 to 2001, 401 haemophilic patients from the Serviço de Hemofilia, Disciplina de Hematologia e Hemoterapia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo were evaluated. The episodes of ICH were documented by CT scan and the anatomic location, clinical presentation, relationship to trauma and clinical factors, including the presence of HIV infection and the presence of inhibitor, were reviewed. Among 401 haemophilic patients, 45 ICH episodes in 35 (8.7%) patients with age ranging from 4 days to 49 years (mean 10.6 years) were observed. A history of recent trauma was documented in 24 (53.3%) cases. Seventeen (37.8%) episodes occurred in more than one site of bleeding, 12 (26.7%) were subdural, seven (15.5%) subarachnoid, four (8.9%) epidural, two (4.4%) intracerebral and one (2.2%) intraventricular. The most frequent symptoms were headache and drowsiness. All patients were submitted to replacement therapy and neurosurgical intervention was performed in eight (17.8%) patients. Despite the treatment, three (8.6%) haemophilia A patients died due to the ICH event and three presented late sequelae. The most important aspect of ICH management is the early replacement therapy in haemophilic patients. This prompt treatment will increase the chances of a better prognosis. Another impact measure consists in the administration of the deficient coagulation factor after every head trauma, even when considered minor.


Subject(s)
Hemophilia A/complications , Hemophilia B/complications , Intracranial Hemorrhages/etiology , Adult , Age Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Craniocerebral Trauma/complications , Factor IX/therapeutic use , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/complications , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia B/drug therapy , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intracranial Hemorrhages/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
5.
Haemophilia ; 8(3): 199-204, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12010411

ABSTRACT

The success of haemophilia treatment is based on well-established criteria, and the use of clotting factor concentrates is fundamental. These strategies are seen in the developed world when measures of quality of life are studied or when disabilities are evaluated among haemophilic patients. At the same time, countries in the developing world, with almost 80% of the haemophilia population, are making tremendous efforts to change their diagnosis and treatment methods, in order to improve their healthcare and therefore be able to promote better life for haemophiliacs. However, these goals are threatened when there are many social needs and few economic resources. There is wide variation in conditions in these countries, depending on what has already been done, how many patients the country has, how the blood banking services are planned and obviously, what are the interested parties. Even with so many difficulties, there are ways to work towards and reach the most important goal, which is to prepare the haemophiliacs to be citizens that are as productive and capable of working as are the nonhaemophiliacs. Each country has to take its part; the commitment of the community, physicians and government will be needed to design a model that is compatible with all the necessities and possibilities, and is understood by all the persons involved.


Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Hemophilia A/therapy , Blood Banks/organization & administration , Blood Coagulation Factors/therapeutic use , Brazil , Comprehensive Health Care , Hemophilia A/economics , Hemophilia A/epidemiology , Humans
6.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 34(6): 735-43, Jun. 2001. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-285846

ABSTRACT

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (AML M3) is a well-defined subtype of leukemia with specific and peculiar characteristics. Immediate identification of t(15;17) or the PML/RARA gene rearrangement is fundamental for treatment. The objective of the present study was to compare fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and karyotyping in 18 samples (12 at diagnosis and 6 after treatment) from 13 AML M3 patients. Bone marrow samples were submitted to karyotype G-banding, FISH and RT-PCR. At diagnosis, cytogenetics was successful in 10 of 12 samples, 8 with t(15;17) and 2 without. FISH was positive in 11/12 cases (one had no cells for analysis) and positivity varied from 25 to 93 per cent (mean: 56 per cent). RT-PCR was done in 6/12 cases and all were positive. Four of 8 patients with t(15;17) presented positive RT-PCR as well as 2 without metaphases. The lack of RT-PCR results in the other samples was due to poor quality RNA. When the three tests were compared at diagnosis, karyotyping presented the translocation in 80 per cent of the tested samples while FISH and RT-PCR showed the PML/RARA rearrangement in 100 per cent of them. Of 6 samples evaluated after treatment, 3 showed a normal karyotype, 1 persistence of an abnormal clone and 2 no metaphases. FISH was negative in 4 samples studied and 2 had no material for analysis. RT-PCR was positive in 4 (2 of which showed negative FISH, indicating residual disease) and negative in 2. When the three tests were compared after treatment, they showed concordance in 2 of 6 samples or, when there were not enough cells for all tests, concordance between karyotype and RT-PCR in one. At remission, RT-PCR was the most sensitive test in detecting residual disease, as expected (positive in 4/6 samples). An incidence of about 40 per cent of 5' breaks and 60 per cent of 3' breaks, i.e., bcr3 and bcr1/bcr2, respectively, was observed.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adult , Middle Aged , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17/genetics , Genetic Techniques , Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute/genetics , Translocation, Genetic , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Marrow , Electrophoresis, Agar Gel , Gene Rearrangement , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Karyotyping/methods , Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute/diagnosis , Neoplasm, Residual/diagnosis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
7.
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 34(6): 735-43, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11378661

ABSTRACT

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (AML M3) is a well-defined subtype of leukemia with specific and peculiar characteristics. Immediate identification of t(15;17) or the PML/RARA gene rearrangement is fundamental for treatment. The objective of the present study was to compare fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and karyotyping in 18 samples (12 at diagnosis and 6 after treatment) from 13 AML M3 patients. Bone marrow samples were submitted to karyotype G-banding, FISH and RT-PCR. At diagnosis, cytogenetics was successful in 10 of 12 samples, 8 with t(15;17) and 2 without. FISH was positive in 11/12 cases (one had no cells for analysis) and positivity varied from 25 to 93% (mean: 56%). RT-PCR was done in 6/12 cases and all were positive. Four of 8 patients with t(15;17) presented positive RT-PCR as well as 2 without metaphases. The lack of RT-PCR results in the other samples was due to poor quality RNA. When the three tests were compared at diagnosis, karyotyping presented the translocation in 80% of the tested samples while FISH and RT-PCR showed the PML/RARA rearrangement in 100% of them. Of 6 samples evaluated after treatment, 3 showed a normal karyotype, 1 persistence of an abnormal clone and 2 no metaphases. FISH was negative in 4 samples studied and 2 had no material for analysis. RT-PCR was positive in 4 (2 of which showed negative FISH, indicating residual disease) and negative in 2. When the three tests were compared after treatment, they showed concordance in 2 of 6 samples or, when there were not enough cells for all tests, concordance between karyotype and RT-PCR in one. At remission, RT-PCR was the most sensitive test in detecting residual disease, as expected (positive in 4/6 samples). An incidence of about 40% of 5' breaks and 60% of 3' breaks, i.e., bcr3 and bcr1/bcr2, respectively, was observed.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17/genetics , Genetic Techniques , Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute/genetics , Translocation, Genetic , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Electrophoresis, Agar Gel , Female , Gene Rearrangement , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Karyotyping/methods , Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm, Residual/diagnosis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
8.
Haemophilia ; 2(1): 51-3, 1996 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27213907

ABSTRACT

The clinical severity of haemophilia is usually related to residual clotting factor activity. Reports of factor V deficiency or protein C have been described in haemophilic patients and both are involved in the activated protein C pathway. Recently, the poor response to activated protein C due to factor V Leiden (FQ506) has been associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and its incidence in the normal population is given as 2-7%. We describe three cases of severe haemophilia A heterozygous for factor V Leiden and its influence on phenotype.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...