Pacemaker lead-associated tricuspid regurgitation in patients with or without pre-existing right ventricular dilatation.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention became an option for pacemaker lead-associated tricuspid regurgitation. This study investigated the progression of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with or without pre-existing right ventricular dilatation (RVD) undergoing pacemaker implantation. METHODS: Patients were included if they had implantation of transtricuspid pacemaker lead and completed echocardiography before and after implantation. The cohort was divided in patients with and without RVD (cut-off basal RV diameter ≥ 42 mm). TR was graded in none/mild, moderate, and severe. Worsening of one grade was defined as progression. Survival analyses were plotted for 10 years. RESULTS: In total, 990 patients were analyzed (24.5% with RVD). Progression of TR occurred in 46.1% of patients with RVD and in 25.6% of patients without RVD (P < 0.001). Predictors for TR progression were RV dilatation (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.27-3.29; P = 0.003), pre-existing TR (OR 4.30; 95% CI 2.51-7.38; P < 0.001), female sex (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.16-2.43; P = 0.006), single RV lead (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.09-2.56; P = 0.018), mitral regurgitation (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.42-3.05; P < 0.001), and enlarged left atrium (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.07-3.67; P = 0.03). Survival-predictors were pacemaker lead-associated TR (HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.04-1.84; P = 0.028), mitral regurgitation (HR 1.34; 95% CI 1.02-1.77; P = 0.034), heart failure (HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.31-2.33; P < 0.001), kidney disease (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.25-2.11; P < 0.001), and age ≥ 80 years (HR 2.84; 95% CI 2.17-3.71; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RVD receiving pacemaker suffered from increased TR progression, leading to decreased survival.

Sex Differences and Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Pacemakers.

Introduction: Evidence of sex-related differences in patients with pacemakers regarding comorbidities is insufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship of cardiovascular comorbidities and sex category with properties of pacemaker implantation, pacemaker follow-up, and long-term survival. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study consisted of 6,362 pacemaker-patients (39.7% female) enrolled between May 2000 and April 2015. Functional pacemaker parameters were registered at regular pacemaker controls. Survival status and cause of death were analyzed in relation to comorbidities, implanted pacing devices, and echocardiography. Survival analyses were plotted for a 10-year follow-up. Results: Patients with hypertension or hyperlipidemia had higher rates of implantations due to sick sinus syndrome (28.6 vs. 25.5% without hypertension, P < 0.001; 30.7 vs. 25.7% without hyperlipidemia, P < 0.001), while endocarditis was associated with higher rates of implantations due to AV block (46.7 vs. 33.4%, P < 0.001). Patients with valvular heart disease had higher rates of pacemaker implantation due to bradycardic atrial fibrillation (24.9 vs. 21.0% without valvular heart disease, P < 0.001). Ventricular pacing threshold increased in both sexes during the follow-up and was higher in women in the final follow-up (0.94 vs. 0.91 V in men, P = 0.002). During the 10-years follow-up, 6.1% of women and 8.6% of men underwent lead replacement (P = 0.054). Device and lead replacement rates were increased if the comorbidities coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, valvular heart disease, previous stroke/TIA, atrial arrhythmias, chronic kidney disease, or endocarditis were present. Diabetes and previous CABG increase the rates of device replacement, but not the rate of lead replacement. Severe tricuspid regurgitation after implantation of pacemaker was present in more men than women (14.4 vs. 6.1%, P < 0.001). In a multivariate COX regression, the following variables were associated with independent decrease of 10-year survival: hypertension (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09-1.64), chronic kidney disease (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.53-2.19), tricuspid regurgitation after pacemaker implantation (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.26-1.74). Survival was independently increased in female sex (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99) and hyperlipidemia (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97). Conclusions: Cardiovascular comorbidities influenced significantly pacemaker implantations and long-term outcome. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT03388281.

Multimarker Approach to Identify Patients with Coronary Artery Disease at High Risk for Subsequent Cardiac Adverse Events: The Multi-Biomarker Study.

In our prospective non-randomized, single-center cohort study (n = 161), we have evaluated a multimarker approach including S100 calcium binding protein A12 (S100A1), interleukin 1 like-receptor-4 (IL1R4), adrenomedullin, copeptin, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), and ischemia modified albumin (IMA) in prediction of subsequent cardiac adverse events (AE) during 1-year follow-up in patients with coronary artery disease. The primary endpoint was to assess the combined discriminatory predictive value of the selected 7 biomarkers in prediction of AE (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, death, stroke, and hospitalization) by canonical discriminant function analysis. The main secondary endpoints were the levels of the 7 biomarkers in the groups with/without AE; comparison of the calculated discriminant score of the biomarkers with traditional logistic regression and C-statistics. The canonical correlation coefficient was 0.642, with a Wilk's lambda value of 0.78 and p < 0.001. By using the calculated discriminant equation with the weighted mean discriminant score (centroid), the sensitivity and specificity of our model were 79.4% and 74.3% in prediction of AE. These values were higher than that of the calculated C-statistics if traditional risk factors with/without biomarkers were used for AE prediction. In conclusion, canonical discriminant analysis of the multimarker approach is able to define the risk threshold at the individual patient level for personalized medicine.

New cut-off values of cardiac markers for risk stratification of angina pectoris.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this present prospective study was to investigate the accuracy of cardiac markers for the prediction of subsequent cardiac events (cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction and recurrent ischemia requiring coronary revascularization). METHODS: Fibrinogen, cardiac troponin T, troponin I, creatine phosphokinase myocardial fraction, C-reactive protein and myoglobin at baseline and after 6 h were measured on 154 patients (109 male, 63+/-11 years) with chest pain. Receiver operator characteristic analyses were performed to determine cut-off points of cardiac markers in prediction of adverse events. RESULTS: The following cut-off values for prediction of cardiac events were calculated: troponin I at baseline 0.3 ng/ml (predictive accuracy=0.870), troponin I at 6 h 0.50 ng/ml (p.a.=0.909); troponin T at baseline 0.05 ng/ml (p.a.=0.643), troponin T at 6 h 0.05 ng/ml (p.a.=0.612), creatine phosphokinase myocardial fraction at baseline 2.0 ng/ml (p.a.=0.721), creatine phosphokinase myocardial fraction at 6 h 2.5 ng/ml (p.a.=0.734), myoglobin at baseline 23 ng/ml (p.a.=0.623), myoglobin at 6 h 26 ng/ml (p.a.=0.617), C-reactive protein at baseline 0.31 mg/dl (p.a.=0.662), C-reactive protein at 6 h 0.55 mg/dl (p.a.=0.682), and fibrinogen at baseline 360 mg/dl (p.a.=0.701). The combination of baseline troponin I with different parameters resulted in a higher sensitivity of up to 98%, with a similar predictive accuracy, but a lower specificity. Additive measurements of cardiac troponin I at 6 h to baseline cardiac troponin T and I proved to be the best combination for prediction of subsequent cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in cut-off levels of cardiac markers and inflammatory parameters results in a high accuracy of risk stratification in patients with chest pains. Combination of these measurements might further help in the identification of patients who would benefit from early coronary revascularization.