ABSTRACT
Introduction: Laparoscopy in gallbladder cancer (GBC) has a possible role in staging, radical cure, and palliation in gallbladder cancer. However, a few studies have advocated the use of laparoscopic approach and concluded the safety of this approach. This present study was undertaken to determine the safety and feasibility between open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with the non-metastatic GBC. Materials and Methods: A systematic database search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar for relevant articles. As a result, a list of such studies, clinical trials, published in English up to May 2021, was obtained,14 studies were included and statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan software 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre). Results: The 5-year survival rate was reported in 13 out of 14 studies (1388 patients), and all compared laparoscopic and open approach. There was no significant heterogeneity in between the studies (chi-square, 10.66; df, 12; I2, 0%). There was significant higher overall survival in open group (389/850 vs 194/538 or 1.45, 95% CI (1.12-1.88), P value, 0.005). There was no significant difference in recurrence rate, operative time, blood loss, lymph node yield, and postoperative complication in between open and laparoscopic groups. Conclusions: Our present study demonstrates that overall survival is significantly increased with open approach when compared with laparoscopic approach. There is no difference in recurrence rate, operative time, blood loss, lymph node yield, and postoperative complications between the open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy groups.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic and conventional techniques following Total Pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (TPLE) with respect to perioperative morbidity and mortality and postoperative recovery in post cricoid cancer patients. This is a prospective study, which was undertaken in Gujrat Cancer Research Institute (GCRI) in the period of July 2007 to March 2010. Fifteen consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic TPLE were compared to that of 18 consecutive patients who underwent open TPLE. Laparoscopic and open TPLE procedure were compared with respect to patient characteristics, intra operative and complications present. The average duration was observed to be 3.5 h in the MIS (Minimally Invasive Group) group and was 5.3 h in the open group. The average blood loss was 300 mL in the MIS group and 500 mL in the open group. Average duration of the hospital stay in the MIS group was 13 days and 16 days in the open group. In the MIS group, one patient (6.7%) had a pneumonic complication and two patients (13%) had wound complications. In the open group, six patients (33%) had pneumonic consolidation and four patients (22%) had wound infections. In both groups, one patient each suffered mortality. Laparoscopic TPLE has been found to be much safer with less morbidity as compared with open surgery.
ABSTRACT
It is a known fact that a disabled person is a greater burden to society than a dead person. Krukenberg operation, first described by German army surgeon in 1917, Hermann Krukenberg, converts a forearm stump into a pincer, so as to retain some dexterity of the hand rather than it being reduced to a mere stump. We report this case of Krukenberg operation performed in a tertiary care setup, wherein an amputated forearm stump was converted into a functional pincer that can result in huge advantage for poor amputee patients in developing countries who rely heavily on the functionality of their hands to earn their everyday meal and are unable to bear the expense of costly prosthesis. One such patient, a 25-year-old male hailing from a very poor background who came to us with traumatic amputation of his dominant hand.
