Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 85(6): 2833-2840, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37363595

ABSTRACT

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy, is a stand-alone therapy or is used in combination with other treatments for the treatment of androgenic alopecia. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the improvement in hair density seen, when PRP was used alone and when used as an adjunct. Methods: Conforming to systematic review and meta-analysis recommendations, we performed a meta-analysis of relevant articles in multiple databases, from inception till May 2022. Randomized clinical trials were included that evaluated the use of PRP alone or used PRP as an adjuvant with previously used therapies. Hair density data at the start of treatment and follow-up after 3 and 6 months was used for analysis. Results: A review of 255 articles included nine studies, for a cumulative data set of 230 individuals. In comparison to the placebo, stand-alone PRP therapy resulted in a significant increase in hair density (MD=25.39, P<0.00001.) PRP combination therapy also showed marked improvement in hair density compared to placebo (MD=34.38, P=0.002.) When comparing stand-alone PRP to combination therapy, MD=36.16, and MD=34.63 was observed for the two groups, respectively. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis reaffirm previous studies that suggest the role of PRP in improving hair density in AGA; however, the results cannot justify the use of PRP-combined therapy. Stand-alone PRP therapy should be considered in the management protocols for both men and women, whereas more studies and may be, different combination therapies are required before combined therapy can be included in the management guidelines for AGA.

4.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 72(10): 2014-2018, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36660991

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the psychological impact of coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic on college students, and to explore factors influencing their anxiety and depression levels. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2020 to January 2021 at the Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, and comprised medical students of either gender in the first to third year of the academic programme. Data was collected using a pretested online structured questionnaire comprising demographic information, academic problems, daily life difficulties and the 25-item Aga Khan University Anxiety and Depression Scale. Data was analysed using SPSS22. RESULTS: Of the 397 students, 72(18.1%) were males and 325(81.9%) were females. The overall mean age of the sample was 19.9±1.2 years. Of the total, 221(55.7%) students were found to be anxious and depressed. Factors related to academic difficulties and daily life issues had significant correlation (p<0.05) with anxiety and depression. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that the need for some form of mental health support was the most significant (p<0.001) predictor of anxiety and depression, followed by family issues (p<0.001) and social media (p<0.001). Anxiety and depression were also significantly associated with fear of family or friend getting coronavirus disease-2019 (p=0.003), lack of attentiveness to study (p=0.040) and felt anxiety when ordering food online (p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: With better understanding, academic institutions and healthcare policymakers may take measures and mitigate students' distress during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , COVID-19 , Depression , Students, Medical , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Pandemics , Students, Medical/psychology , Risk Factors
5.
BMC Res Notes ; 11(1): 370, 2018 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29884241

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Monitoring tuberculosis treatment outcomes and understanding the reasons for unsuccessful treatment are important indicators for evaluating the performance of the national tuberculosis control program. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes among pulmonary TB (PTB) patients and identify the predictors of unsuccessful treatment outcome. RESULTS: Treatment success rate of 67.8% among new and retreatment PTB patients and 69% in new smear positive PTB patients was observed. Close to 21% (20.9%) and 15.7% PTB and new smear positive PTB patients had loss to follow-up during treatment. Overall, older patients (AOR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.0), smokers (AOR 1.65; 95% CI 1.02-2.67) and retreatment cases of TB (AOR 2.34; 95% CI 1.43-3.84) were at greater risk of having unsuccessful treatment outcomes. Moreover, sputum positivity at 2 months (AOR 13.78; 95% CI 5.09-37.26) was a significant predictor of poor treatment outcomes in new smear positive PTB patients. The treatment success rate among PTB patients was lower than the recommended 85% success rate. TB patients at higher risk of unsuccessful treatment outcomes should be provided with enhanced supervision and treatment monitoring to improve the success rate of TB management in Pakistan.


Subject(s)
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Demography , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Pakistan/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...