Understanding the Perspective of Youths on Undergoing Metabolic Monitoring While on Second-Generation Antipsychotics: Challenges, Insight, and Implications.

Introduction: Prescription of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in youths is rapidly increasing globally, despite the potential for significant adverse effects and long-term health consequences. A known adverse reaction resulting from SGAs is metabolic syndrome (MS). Youths exposed to antipsychotics are at higher risk than adults for adverse drug reactions, including adverse events such as MS (with weight gain as the most significant adverse outcome) and other long-term endocrinological abnormalities. This study aimed to explore the experiences of young patients on factors impacting barriers to metabolic monitoring of SGAs and the strategies to address those barriers thereby providing further guidance on policy and service delivery. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients (youths who were prescribed SGAs) who attended Child and Youth Mental Health Services. The interviews focused on barriers to monitoring and strategies to enhance rates of monitoring that could be customized across study sites. Results: Young patients revealed that none of them had any concerns or objections to receiving anthropometric metabolic measurements. However, they seemed concerned to undergo blood tests as part of the metabolic monitoring process. Specifically, youths cited their fear of the needles as barrier to undergo the required blood tests. Youths have also reported that their dislike to healthy foods and exercise being the most common challenge they face while trying to engage in a healthy lifestyle to manage the SGAs resulted weight gain. Conclusion: Prescribers are recommended to actively engage young patients about the expected SGAs-induced adverse effects, the importance of conducting metabolic monitoring, and how to prevent and minimize the expected adverse effects from the start of initiating SGAs. This could be a vital step toward a successful treatment as the insight of youths into the details of the chosen treatment can play a significant role into treatment adherence and recovery.

Practitioners' Perspective on Metabolic Monitoring of Second-Generation Antipsychotics: Existing Gaps in Knowledge, Barriers to Monitoring, and Strategies.

Introduction: Prescription of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in youth is rapidly increasing globally and in Australia. Lack of timely metabolic monitoring for potential adverse effects puts youth at greater risk for lifelong adverse health impact. Metabolic monitoring is recommended as best practice to prevent and/or manage SGA-induced weight gain/metabolic syndrome. The adherence to clinical guidelines remains suboptimal. It is crucial to gauge insight to challenges and strategies from the perspective of prescribers and to recommend strategies in promoting quality use of SGAs and adherence to pharmacovigilance standards. Methods: Psychiatrists participated through semistructured interviews within the community mental health clinics in the Queensland State of Australia. The interviews focused on barriers to monitoring and strategies to enhance rate of monitoring with key focus on practical strategies for future implications in community setting. Results: Ten participants completed the interviews. Barriers were specified such as lack of adequate resources to conduct monitoring, carers' disengagement in their youth's treatments, and patients' refusal to undergo blood tests. Strategies to enhance metabolic monitoring heavily relied on organizational support, provision of training, and education opportunities. Conclusions: Clinical recommendations require mental health providers to facilitate conduction of metabolic monitoring among youth prescribed SGA/s. However, they are not provided with enough support and there are challenges that prevent such care. It is crucial to understand the challenges in managing a complex and vulnerable patient cohort. This research has thrown light on these key aspects of existing gap between best practice standards and clinical practice in youth prescribed SGAs.

Current pharmacotherapy options for conduct disorders in adolescents and children.

INTRODUCTION: Conduct disorder (CD) is a common mental health disorder of childhood and adolescence. CD's complexity, with its heterogenous clinical manifestations and overlapping comorbidities makes the application of evidence-based management approaches challenging. This article aims to combine a systematic review of the available literature, with a consensus opinion from both child and adolescent psychiatrists and developmental pediatricians on the clinical and pharmacological management of children and adolescents with conduct disorder (CD). AREAS COVERED: The authors review the CD population and provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapies using preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) and strength of evidence recommendation taxonomy (SORT) guidelines. The authors then provide an expert clinical opinion for the use of different pharmacotherapies to address aggressive and disruptive behavior in children. EXPERT OPINION: Atypical antipsychotics (e.g. risperidone) demonstrate evidence for efficacy in CD. Other pharmacotherapies (e.g. mood stabilizers, anticonvulsants, psychostimulants and selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors) have a low level of evidence for CD alone, however, can sometimes be effective in managing the symptoms of CD when other psychiatric disorders are also present.