Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0277582, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743739

ABSTRACT

Although a fifth metatarsal stress fracture is the most frequent stress fracture in soccer players, awareness of fifth metatarsal stress fractures among soccer coaches is unclear. Therefore, we performed an online survey of soccer coaches affiliated with the Japan Football Association to assess their awareness of fifth metatarsal stress fractures. A total of 150 soccer coaches were invited for an original online survey. Data on participants' age, sex, types of coaching licence, coaching category, types of training surface, awareness of fifth metatarsal stress fractures, and measures employed to prevent fifth metatarsal stress fractures were collected using the survey. Data from 117 coaches were analysed. Eighty-seven of the 117 coaches were aware of fifth metatarsal stress fractures; however, only 30% reported awareness of preventive and treatment measures for fifth metatarsal stress fractures. Licensed coaches (i.e., licensed higher than level C) were also more likely to be aware of fifth metatarsal stress fractures than unlicensed coaches were. Furthermore, although playing on artificial turf is an established risk factor for numerous sports injuries, soccer coaches who usually trained on artificial turf were more likely to be unaware of the risks associated with fifth metatarsal stress fractures than coaches who trained on other surfaces were (e.g., clay fields). Soccer coaches in the study population were generally aware of fifth metatarsal stress fractures; however, most were unaware of specific treatment or preventive training strategies for fifth metatarsal stress fractures. Additionally, coaches who practised on artificial turf were not well educated on fifth metatarsal stress fractures. Our findings suggest the need for increased awareness of fifth metatarsal stress fractures and improved education of soccer coaches regarding injury prevention strategies. .


Subject(s)
Fractures, Stress , Metatarsal Bones , Soccer , Humans , Soccer/injuries , Fractures, Stress/prevention & control , Fractures, Stress/epidemiology , Japan/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Male , Metatarsal Bones/injuries , Female , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Young Adult , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(17): e38011, 2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669391

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of capacitive and resistive monopolar radiofrequency (CRMF) on the shear elastic modulus of the multifidus and erector spinae muscles in female athletes with low back pain (LBP) and a history of LBP. DESIGN: Randomized crossover trial. SETTING: Academic institution. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty female university athletes with LBP or a history of LBP were included. INTERVENTIONS: All participants received CRMF, hotpack, and sham (CRMF without power) in a random order on the right side of the lumbar region. More than 2 days were allocated between the experiments to eliminate any residual effects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The shear elastic moduli of the right multifidus and erector spinae were evaluated in the prone (rest) position while sitting with 35° trunk flexion (stretched) using shear wave ultrasound imaging equipment. The moduli were measured before, immediately after, and 30 minutes after the intervention. RESULTS: Repeated-measures 2-way analysis of variance and post hoc analysis showed that the moduli of the CRMF group were significantly lower than those of the sham group in the stretched position immediately after intervention (P = .045). This difference diminished 30 minutes after the intervention (P = .920). CONCLUSIONS: CRMF can be used to reduce the shear elastic modulus of the multifidus muscle in the short term. Further studies are warranted to determine how to provide longer effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: None.


Subject(s)
Athletes , Cross-Over Studies , Elastic Modulus , Low Back Pain , Humans , Female , Low Back Pain/therapy , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Young Adult , Lumbosacral Region , Adult , Paraspinal Muscles/physiopathology , Paraspinal Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Hyperthermia, Induced/methods
3.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 105: 105968, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37116229

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is the most prevalent musculoskeletal disorder affecting performance and sports participation among athletes and is more prevalent among female athletes. Evaluating the stiffness of the lumbar muscles is important for understanding the pathophysiology of low back pain. Therefore, this study examined the differences in stiffness of the lumbar multifidus and erector spinae muscles between female university athletes with and without low back pain. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. The study was conducted at a single centre, the university research laboratory. Twenty female university athletes with low back pain or a history of low back pain and 20 without low back pain participated in this study. The shear elastic moduli of the multifidus and erector spinae muscles were evaluated in the prone (to relax the muscles) and sitting with 35° of trunk flexion (to stretch the muscles) positions using shear wave ultrasound imaging equipment. FINDINGS: The low back pain group showed significantly greater shear elastic modulus in the multifidus in both prone and sitting positions than the non-low back pain group. There were no differences in the erector spinae muscle between the two groups at either position. INTERPRETATION: These results provide new insights into the microscopic characteristics of low back pain pathophysiology in young female athletes. Stiffness assessment using shear wave elastography will help provide a specific treatment strategy for female athletes with low back pain or a history of low back pain.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain , Humans , Female , Elastic Modulus , Cross-Sectional Studies , Paraspinal Muscles , Athletes
4.
J Man Manip Ther ; 30(6): 342-349, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35343399

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To develop a clinical algorithm for classifying acute lumbar spondylolysis from nonspecific low back pain in elementary school-aged patients using the classification and regression tree analysis. METHODS: Medical records of 73 school-aged patients diagnosed with acute lumbar spondylolysis or nonspecific low back pain were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-eight patients were examined for establishing an algorithm and 15 were employed for testing its performance. The following data were retrieved: age, gender, school grades, days after symptom onset, history of low back pain, days of past low back pain, height, weight, body mass index, passive straight leg raise test results, hours per week spent on sports activities, existence of spina bifida, lumbar lordosis angle, and lumbosacral joint angle. Classification and regression tree analyses were performed 150 times using the bootstrap and aggregating method. Then, the results were integrated by majority vote, establishing an algorithm. RESULTS: Lumbar lordosis angle, days after symptom onset, body mass index, and lumbosacral joint angle were the predictors for classifying those injuries. CONCLUSION: The algorithm can be used to identify elementary school-aged children with low back pain requiring advanced imaging investigation, although a future study with a larger sample population is necessary for validating the algorithm.


Subject(s)
Lordosis , Low Back Pain , Spondylolysis , Child , Humans , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Lumbar Vertebrae , Spondylolysis/diagnosis , Spondylolysis/epidemiology , Algorithms
5.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 46(15): 1026-1032, 2021 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33395023

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish an algorithm to distinguish acute lumbar spondylolysis (LS) from nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) among patients in junior high school by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rapid identification of acute LS is important because delayed diagnosis may result in pseudarthrosis in the pars interarticularis. To diagnose acute LS, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography is necessary. However, not all adolescent patients with low back pain (LBP) can access these technologies. Therefore, a clinical algorithm that can detect acute LS is needed. METHODS: The medical records of 223 junior high school-aged patients with diagnosed acute NSLBP or LS verified by MRI were reviewed. A total of 200 patients were examined for establishing the algorithm and 23 were employed for testing the performance of the algorithm. CART analysis was applied to establish the algorithm using the following data; age, sex, school grades, days after symptom onset, history of LBP, days of past LBP, height, passive straight leg raising test results, hours per week spent in sports activities, existence of spina bifida, lumbar lordosis angle, and lumbosacral joint angle. Sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm and the area under the ROC curve were calculated to assess algorithm performance. RESULTS: The algorithm revealed that sex, days after symptom onset, days of past LBP, hours per week spent in sports activities, and existence of spina bifida were key predictors for identifying acute LS versus NSLBP. Algorithm sensitivity was 0.64, specificity was 0.92, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.79. CONCLUSION: The algorithm can be used in clinical practice to distinguish acute LS from NSLBP in junior high school athletes, although referral to MRI may be necessary for definitive diagnosis considering the algorithm's sensitivity.Level of Evidence: 4.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Athletes , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Spondylolysis/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Spondylolysis/physiopathology
6.
J Bodyw Mov Ther ; 24(1): 109-114, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31987529

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hamstring injuries tend to be chronic in nature and thus require considerable recovery time in athletes. Although some rehabilitation protocols have been previously advocated, there is no consensus in terms of the treatment protocol for chronic hamstring injuries. METHODS: We present the case of a 15-year-old male sprinter who was successfully treated with a combination of manual therapy targeting the lumbosacral region and hamstring-specific exercises. The patient presented with hamstring pain which persisted for 7 weeks. RESULTS: Manual therapy immediately reduced pain and increased muscle strength. The patient was able to run satisfactorily without pain 30 days after the initial intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This case report suggests that the use of manual therapy targeting the lumbosacral region, along with hamstring exercises, may be beneficial in chronic hamstring pain management.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy/methods , Hamstring Muscles/injuries , Leg Injuries/rehabilitation , Musculoskeletal Manipulations/methods , Adolescent , Humans , Male
8.
Man Ther ; 20(4): 515-23, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25475950

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of spinal manipulation (SM) for upper limb pain has been advocated based on the concept of regional interdependence. However, its evidence has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of evidence for the effectiveness of SM in patients with upper limb pain as part of the concept of regional interdependence. METHODS: MeSH and Key words representing two broad subject areas: SM and upper limb disorders were used to conduct an electronic search in sixteen electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials and/or controlled clinical trials investigating the effects of SM in patients with upper limb pain were included. Studies including pain in the neck or scapular region and those using spinal mobilization were excluded. Meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effects of SM on upper limb pain. The overall quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. RESULTS: Out of 3307 studies, six trials met inclusion criteria for this review. Of these, three studies were included in meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results suggested there were no statistical differences between SM and other interventions in the effects on reducing upper limb pain. The overall quality of evidence was very low. CONCLUSION: The number of studies regarding the current topic is limited. There is very low quality evidence that SM is not better nor inferior than other interventions in the management of upper limb pain.


Subject(s)
Arm/physiology , Manipulation, Spinal/methods , Pain Management/methods , Pain/prevention & control , Disease Management , Humans , Physical Therapy Modalities , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...