Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 119(1): 60-4, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20638109

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence rate of lower-extremity lymphedema after systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with uterine corpus malignancies and to elucidate risk factors for this type of lymphedema. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was carried out for all patients with uterine corpus malignant tumor managed at Hokkaido Cancer Center between 1991 and 2007. Patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy as a treatment or died of cancer/intercurrent disease were excluded from this study. All living patients included in this study had hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and lymphadenectomy and their medical records were reviewed. We identified patients with postoperative lower-extremity lymphedema (POLEL). Logistic regression analysis was used to select the risk factors for POLEL. RESULTS: Of 286 patients evaluated, 103 (37.8%) had POLEL. Multivariate analysis confirmed that adjuvant radiation therapy (OR=5.2, 95% CI=2.1-12.7), resection of more than 31 lymph nodes (OR=2.6, 95% CI=1.4-4.9), and removal of circumflex iliac nodes to the distal external iliac nodes (CINDEIN) (OR=6.1, 95% CI=1.3-28.2) were independent risk factors for POLEL. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant radiation therapy should be avoided in patients who undergo systematic lymphadenectomy if an alternative postoperative strategy is possible. Although reducing the number of resected lymph nodes is not appropriate from a therapeutical point of view, elimination of CINDEIN dissection may be helpful in reducing the incidence of POLEL. The clinical significance of CINDEIN dissection needs to be investigated by a randomized controlled trial.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Hysterectomy/adverse effects , Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects , Lymphedema/etiology , Ovariectomy/adverse effects , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Leg , Logistic Models , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
3.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 35(2): 335-7, 2008 Feb.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18281778

ABSTRACT

Case 1: A-35-year-old woman was diagnosed as cervical cancer Stage IIIb. When admitted to the hospital, her tumor marker SCC level was 50 ng/mL. Concurrent chemoradiation therapy was started on November, 2005. The SCC level was reduced by 0.9 ng/mL in February, 2006. In April, tumor recurrence was found by PET, and chemotherapy was restarted, but the SCC level was increased. In September, paclitaxel/S-1 therapy was performed, and the tumor markers were again reduced remarkably (SCC 9.8--> 1.3 ng/mL). Case 2: A-78-year-old woman was diagnosed as cervical cancer Stage IIIb. In August, 2004, concurrent chemoradiation therapy was started, and tumor markers were reduced (SCC 25.4--> 1.8 ng/mL). However, tumor markers were increased soon after the therapy. Chemotherapy was started, but it could not be maintained because of the side effects. In April, 2006, paclitaxel/S-1 therapy was performed, and the tumor markers were reduced remarkably (SCC 120--> 10 ng/mL). However, that therapy could also not be maintained because of the side effect. In July, she died of the cancer.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Neoplasm/blood , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Oxonic Acid/therapeutic use , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Serpins/blood , Tegafur/therapeutic use , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/blood , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neoplasm Staging , Treatment Failure , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...