Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Investig Clin Dent ; 10(1): e12378, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30474243

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy on the healing of mechanical decontamination of infected implant surfaces performed with a titanium brush. METHODS: Mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in six dogs. After 3 months, two unsubmerged implants were installed on both sides of the mandible. Three months later, peri-implantitis was induced with ligatures for 3 months and then removed. After 1 month, surgical mechanical decontamination of the surfaces was performed either with a rotatory titanium brush or gauzes soaked in saline. Five month later, biopsies were retrieved. Evaluations on X-rays taken of the mesiodistal plane and on histological slides prepared in a buccal-lingual plane were performed. RESULTS: After the induction of peri-implantitis, a mean marginal bone loss of 2.6 ± 0.6 mm and 1.9 ± 1.0 mm was observed in the brush and gauze groups by X-ray, respectively. Five months after treatment, a mean gain of marginal bone of 0.6 mm was obtained in both groups. The mean closures of the vertical and horizontal defects were 0.6 mm and 0.6 mm for the brush group, and 0.8 mm and 0.5 mm for the gauze group, respectively. Histologically, a loss of attachment at the buccal aspect of 2.2 ± 0.9 mm in the brush group and of 2.3 ± 0.5 mm in the gauze group was found. No statistically-significant differences were found after the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical implant surface decontamination performed with a rotatory titanium brush resulted in a marginal bone level gain, yielding a low content of inflammatory infiltrate close to the marginal bone.


Subject(s)
Decontamination/methods , Peri-Implantitis/diagnostic imaging , Peri-Implantitis/pathology , Peri-Implantitis/therapy , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Loss/pathology , Alveolar Bone Loss/therapy , Animals , Bicuspid/pathology , Decontamination/instrumentation , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/adverse effects , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Dental Plaque , Dental Prosthesis Design , Disease Models, Animal , Dogs , Implants, Experimental/adverse effects , Mandible/pathology , Mandible/surgery , Peri-Implantitis/surgery , Radiography, Dental/methods , Surface Properties , Titanium
2.
J Investig Clin Dent ; 9(4): e12362, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30144303

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate dimensional variations of augmented sinus volumes after sinus floor elevation using a lateral approach placing the antrostomy close to the sinus floor or more cranially to it. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers in need of sinus floor elevation were included in the study. The lateral approach was adopted placing the antrostomy randomly either close to the level of the sinus floor (group A) or approximately 3-4 mm cranially (group B). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was done before surgery (T0) and after 1 week (T1) and 9 months (T2), and analyses on dimensional variations were performed. RESULTS: CBCT of 10 patients per group were analyzed. At T1, the sinus floor was found to be elevated by 9.8 ± 2.1 mm in group A and 10.9 ± 1.9 mm in group B. At T2, shrinkage of 2.0 ± 1.7 mm in group A and 1.4 ± 2.5 mm in group B was observed. The area was reduced approximately 18-24% between T1 and T2. The sinus mucosa width increased by 4.3-5 mm between T0 and T1, and regained the original dimensions at T2. CONCLUSIONS: The more cranial the antrostomy, the greater the augmentation height after 9 months.


Subject(s)
Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/surgery , Maxillary Sinus/surgery , Sinus Floor Augmentation/methods , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Female , Humans , Male , Maxillary Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...