Skin Antisepsis before Surgical Fixation of Extremity Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating surgical-site infection have had conflicting results with respect to the use of alcohol solutions containing iodine povacrylex or chlorhexidine gluconate as skin antisepsis before surgery to repair a fractured limb (i.e., an extremity fracture). METHODS: In a cluster-randomized, crossover trial at 25 hospitals in the United States and Canada, we randomly assigned hospitals to use a solution of 0.7% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol (iodine group) or 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine group) as preoperative antisepsis for surgical procedures to repair extremity fractures. Every 2 months, the hospitals alternated interventions. Separate populations of patients with either open or closed fractures were enrolled and included in the analysis. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection, which included superficial incisional infection within 30 days or deep incisional or organ-space infection within 90 days. The secondary outcome was unplanned reoperation for fracture-healing complications. RESULTS: A total of 6785 patients with a closed fracture and 1700 patients with an open fracture were included in the trial. In the closed-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 77 patients (2.4%) in the iodine group and in 108 patients (3.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 1.00; P = 0.049). In the open-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 54 patients (6.5%) in the iodine group and in 60 patients (7.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odd ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.27; P = 0.45). The frequencies of unplanned reoperation, 1-year outcomes, and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with closed extremity fractures, skin antisepsis with iodine povacrylex in alcohol resulted in fewer surgical-site infections than antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol. In patients with open fractures, the results were similar in the two groups. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; PREPARE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03523962.).

Immediate Unprotected Weightbearing vs 2 Weeks Nonweightbearing After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative care protocols for ankle fracture surgery remain controversial with variability among care providers. This prospective controlled trial compared 12-week postoperative outcomes for immediate unprotected weightbearing (IMWB) vs nonweightbearing (NWB) for 2 weeks in a splint followed by weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT) in a boot after surgical fixation of selected low-energy ankle fractures without superior articular involvement. METHODS: Eighty-seven patients undergoing surgical fixation of ankle fractures at a single level 1 trauma center were recruited according to specific criteria and enrolled by presentation date. The first 43 eligible patients were allocated to the control group, with NWB in a splint for 2 weeks followed by WBAT in a walker boot. The next 44 patients recruited were allocated to the IMWB group. The primary outcome was the Olerud-Molander score (OMAS). Secondary outcome measures included the Euroquol-5D (EQ5D) score and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) scores, ankle range of motion (ROM), wound complications, time to return to work, radiograph measurements, and fracture reduction loss. In this perioperative-focused study, we collected data on patients until 12 weeks postoperation. RESULTS: The IMWB group had 5 superficial wound complications vs 1 in the control group. At 12 weeks, we found no difference in OMAS, EQ5D, WPAI:SHP scores, ROM, time to return to work, or radiographic measurements. CONCLUSION: In this short-term and relatively small prospective trial, we found more wound complications among patients treated with immediate unprotected weightbearing compared with patients treated with 2 weeks of NWB followed by protected weightbearing. Given the low incidence and small sample size, we do not know if these observed findings are generalizable. However, we also found no difference in functional outcomes at 12 weeks postoperation between these 2 groups. In light of that, we do not recommend IMWB after open reduction internal fixation of low-energy ankle fractures with plate and/or screw fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective controlled trial.

Osteonecrosis of the distal tibia after pilon fractures.

BACKGROUND: Pilon fractures are devastating injuries with high complication rates. Osteonecrosis has been previously described after Weber C fracture-dislocations but has not been reported following fixation of pilon fractures. METHODS: All AO/OTA 43-C pilon fractures from 2007 to 2018 were reviewed. Injury factors and demographics were recorded. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the fracture pattern were analyzed to determine risk factors for ON. RESULTS: 71 pilon fractures in 69 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 21.6 months. 18 patients demonstrated ON at a mean 7.3 months' post-injury. Regression analysis demonstrated no differences between cohorts with respect to smoking status, open injury, or diabetic status. ON was associated with small anterolateral fragment less than 2.0cm2 (OR=19.47, p=0.012), higher comminution (OR=3.00, p=0.005), use of calcium phosphate bone substitute (OR=20.72, p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: ON of the distal tibia was not associated with patient factors but was associated with fracture characteristics.

Plate-Assisted Intramedullary Nailing of Proximal Third Tibia Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To report on the safety of unicortical plate stabilization in conjunction with intramedullary nailing (IMN) of proximal third tibia fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: A Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: All Orthopaedic Trauma Association 41A and 42A/B/C proximal tibia fractures treated with IMN from January 2011 to May 2018 were reviewed. Fifty-three proximal tibia fractures in 50 patients were included in the study. Twenty-four patients were treated with plate-assisted reduction and IMN, and 29 were treated with IMN alone. The plate-assisted IMN cohort was subdivided into patients with plate retention and those that had the plate removed. INTERVENTION: Plate-assisted IMN and IMN only. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patients were followed up for evidence of nonunion, reduction quality, postoperative infection, and rate of implant removal. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between plate-assisted IMN and IMN only for age, fracture type, mechanism of injury, quality of reduction, or implant removal rate. Open fractures were treated more often with plate-assisted IMN (88%) compared with the number of open fractures treated with IMN only (12%). There were no differences in nonunion rate or rate of postoperative infection between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Plate-assisted IMN of proximal third tibia fractures can safely be performed even in open tibia fractures with similar rates of nonunion, infection, and implant removal rates to patients treated with IMN only. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Subtalar joint axis in patients with symptomatic peritalar subluxation compared to normal controls.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of peritalar subluxation (PTS) is poorly understood and likely mutifactorial. An anatomic predisposition for posterolateral subluxation of the hindfoot has not been previously described or investigated. The aim of the current study was to describe the morphology of the subtalar joint axis (STJA) in patients with symptomatic PTS compared to normal controls. METHODS: We identified patients with symptomatic PTS who had undergone operative correction from hospital records. The angle of the axis of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint was made on simulated weight-bearing CT (SWBCT) scans. A control group of patients who had no foot deformity on standing films was used for comparison. The STJA was defined as the angle between the superior talar dome and the posterior facet of the talus on coronal CT scan. The mean, maximum, and minimum STJAs were calculated for each cut from anterior to posterior across the posterior facet. The trend in progression across the posterior facet was also examined. RESULTS: After exclusions, 22 feet in 20 patients were included in the study group and compared to 20 control subjects. It was seen that patients with PTS had an increased valgus orientation of the subtalar joint. In patients with PTS the STJA began in valgus and progressed to even greater valgus from anterior to posterior across the posterior facet. The STJA in control subjects was seen instead to begin in slight varus and transition to valgus at the junction of the anterior and middle third and then increase in valgus as the joint progressed posteriorly. CONCLUSIONS: The valgus orientation of the coronal plane of the subtalar joint may represent an anatomic contribution to the etiology of PTS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative series.

Anatomy of the varus foot and ankle.

In summary, varus deformity of the foot and ankle encompasses a spectrum of deformities from mild to severe. The cause of this deformity may be bone, muscle imbalance, or a combination of both. Surgical intervention should be planned only after the patient's anatomy is understood. Uncorrected symptomatic varus deformities may have significant consequences on gait kinematics and foot biomechanics.

Preference-based quality of life of end-stage ankle arthritis treated with arthroplasty or arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: Health state values, or "utilities,'' are an important preference-based measure of quality of life used by health economists. This study describes the utilities reported by a multicenter cohort of subjects with end-stage ankle arthritis treated with ankle arthrodesis or total ankle arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects with end-stage ankle arthritis were enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort study. All subjects received either ankle arthrodesis or total ankle arthroplasty. Participants completed baseline SF-36 outcome evaluations preoperatively and at 1-year followup. Preference-based quality of life was assessed using health state values (HSVs) derived from the SF-36 (SF-6D transformation). RESULTS: 107 subjects were included. The mean baseline SF-6D health state value for the TAA group was 0.67 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.69) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.68) for the arthrodesis group. At 1-year followup, the mean reported health state value was 0.73 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.76) for the total ankle arthroplasty group and 0.73 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.76) for the ankle arthrodesis group. The 1-year followup results approach age- and gender-matched US population norms. Health state values poorly correlated with age, however, significant differences between genders were detected. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate an improvement in preference-based quality of life following ankle arthroplasty or arthrodesis. The results also provide necessary data that can be used in future cost-effectiveness analyses.