Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 60(3): 313-318, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35130100

ABSTRACT

To evaluate orthodontic care for patients with craniofacial anomalies (CFA) by identifying orthodontic residents' preparedness to treat certain conditions and willingness to receive more training in CFA.A 12-question survey was sent through the American Association of Orthodontics (AAO) organization to orthodontic residents. Questions were primarily designed to obtain information on the frequency with which they dealt with patients with CFA in their training, specific craniofacial conditions that orthodontic residents feel comfortable treating.A total of 150 participants out of 1066 responded. Of the 150 responses, 35% were first-year residents, 43% second year, and 22% were third-year residents. Thirty nine percent of residents saw 3 or more CFA patients during their residency followed by 24% that saw no patients with CFA. Forty five percent reported that 1 to 3 hours of lecture time was devoted to CFA per month. Sixty percent felt their training in CFA was not sufficient to feel comfortable treating these patients in practice. Specifically, 62% felt comfortable treating Down syndrome, 84% unilateral cleft lip and/or palate, and 64% bilateral cleft lip and/or palate, while the majority did not feel comfortable treating Pierre Robin sequence (68%), Cleidocranial dysplasia (65%), Crouzon syndrome (75%), Pfeiffer syndrome (80%), Treacher Collins syndrome (76%), Apert syndrome (76%), CHARGE syndrome (84%), and DiGeorge sequence (84%). Seventy eight percent of residents reported that they would like more training in treating craniofacial.Orthodontic residents did not feel comfortable treating patients with CFA. Majority of the residents felt that they would like to learn more about CFA.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Craniofacial Abnormalities , Internship and Residency , Orthodontics , Humans , United States , Cleft Lip/therapy , Cleft Palate/therapy , Craniofacial Abnormalities/therapy
2.
Dent J (Basel) ; 10(6)2022 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35735647

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to investigate the accuracy of mini-implant placement with the use of a computer designed surgical guide derived by intraoral scanning alongside Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) or the use of a 2D radiograph. METHODS: Thirty-five mini-implants (Aarhus® System: n = 20, Ø: 1.5 mm and AbsoAnchor®: n = 15, Ø: 1.3-1.4 mm) were placed in the maxilla and mandible of 15 orthodontic patients for anchorage purposes in cases where a CBCT was needed due to impacted teeth or for safety reasons. All were placed with the help of a computer designed surgical guide. One implant became loose and was excluded from the study. For 18 mini-implants (study group), CBCT and intraoral scanning were used for guide design, while for 16 (control group) only intraoral scanning and panoramic imaging information were used. Mini-implant position was recorded by angular and linear measurements on digital models created by combining Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) and stereolithography (.stl) files. Accuracy in positioning was determined by comparing corresponding measurements for virtual and real positioned mini-implants on digital models before and after operation. The results were statistically analyzed with t-tests and the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: No significant statistical differences were found for pre- and post-operational angular measurements in the study group, while significant statistical differences occurred on the same measurements for the control group (coronal angle 13.6° pre-op and 22.7° post-op, p-value = 0.002, axial angle 13.4° pre-op and 15.9° post-op, p-value = 0.034). Linear measurements pre- and post-operational for either group presented no significant statistical differences. CONCLUSIONS: A 3D designed and manufactured surgical guide with information concerning CBCT and intraoral scanning ensures accuracy on mini-implant placement while design of the guide without the use of a CBCT is less accurate, especially on inclination of the implant.

3.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 25(3): 429-436, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34863033

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients with Class II subdivision malocclusion present skeletal and dental asymmetries. The purpose of this study is to assess those asymmetries by 3D mirroring and colormap quantification. METHODS: This study analyzed 50 initial CBCTs divided into two groups: Class I (control group) and Class II subdivision (study group) malocclusion patients. CBCTs were oriented and full skull was segmented generating a 3D model. The right side of the 3D models was mirrored, using a midsagittal plane as reference, resulting in a perfectly symmetric skull based on two right sides. Original and mirrored models were superimposed on the unchanged right half, and differences were quantified using a colormap. Eight regions of interest were assessed: gonion, mandibular front, maxillary front, zygomatic process, maxillary and mandibular canine and molar areas. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences using the Mann-Whitney test were found in six of the eight evaluated areas when comparing the control to the study group. The maxillary skeletal areas did not show any difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Class II subdivision malocclusion show true skeletal and dental asymmetries when comparing right and left sides. The maxilla showed no significant skeletal asymmetry, but the maxillary teeth were positioned more mesially on the Class II side. The maxillary canine on the Class II side was also more bucally positioned. The mandible showed significant asymmetries with both skeletal and dental areas in the Class II side more distally and bucally positioned.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class II , Malocclusion , Cephalometry/methods , Cuspid , Facial Asymmetry , Humans , Mandible , Maxilla
4.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 159(5): e411-e422, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33648802

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since the introduction of direct to consumer orthodontic (DTCO) products in the last decade, these products have been increasing in popularity among orthodontic patients. The purpose of the current article was to assess the populations' perception of DTCOs and to examine various factors that may influence their decision in choosing treatment with DTCO products. METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based survey was conducted in the United States. The 35-question survey was disseminated through Amazon Mechanical Turk (Amazon.com, Inc, Seattle, Wash), and participants were asked questions about their demographics, their perceptions of DTCOs, orthodontists, and factors that may influence their decision should they decide to pursue orthodontic treatment. Pearson's correlations were conducted to assess the association between various factors and the participants' likelihood to choose DTCO products. RESULTS: A total of 1441 subjects participated in the study. More than 83% of the participants have considered pursuing orthodontic treatment to some extent. Twenty-three percent reported that they would highly likely choose DTCO products. The majority of participants reported convenience to be the greatest benefit of DTCOs, followed by cost. The majority of responses seemed to favor DTCOs. Forty-seven percent reported that the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic did not affect their preference, whereas 26.6% reported to be more likely to pursue DTCOs because of the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants seemed to perceive DTCOs as a viable alternative for seeking orthodontic care. Although participants had concerns about the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, results showed that the pandemic might not significantly affect the preferences. Orthodontists and their constituent organizations may consider more robust awareness and advocacy campaigns to educate the population about orthodontic treatment and the benefits of pursuing treatment with a trained orthodontist.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Orthodontics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Orthodontists , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
5.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 49(5): 352-357, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33612409

ABSTRACT

AIM OF THE STUDY: Patients with Hemifacial Microsomia (HFM) exhibit highly variable skeletal and soft tissue asymmetries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate soft tissue discrepancies in patients with HFM and correlate them to the skeletal discrepancy. Eight patients were selected and studied retrospectively using 3-dimensional (3D) superimposition and color mapping of the soft and hard tissues. The skeletal and soft tissue facial structures were segmented and mirrored, resulting in a perfectly symmetric skull and face. Original and mirrored 3D models were superimposed. Differences between the affected and normal side were assessed in seven areas: frontal, endocanthion, exocanthion, malar, maxillary frontal, mandibular frontal and gonion area. The correlations between the skeletal and soft tissue asymmetry were evaluated by Pearson correlations. Hard tissue asymmetry ranged from 1.4 mm (Endocanthion) to 5.5 mm (Gonion), while soft tissue asymmetry ranged from 1.5 mm (Endocanthion) to 5.6 mm (Malar). Correlation between skeletal and soft tissue deficiency were highly variable, with the highest correlation at gonion and the lowest at exocanthion. Bone and soft tissue hypoplasia were highly correlated at the gonion and the malar area, while the remaining evaluated areas demonstrated poor correlation between skeletal and soft tissue asymmetries. Future studies will determine if target treatment can reliably improve bone and soft tissue hypoplasia in this area.


Subject(s)
Goldenhar Syndrome , Face , Facial Asymmetry/diagnostic imaging , Goldenhar Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies
6.
J Nutr Educ Behav ; 46(3): 164-170, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24433816

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore possible links between adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MeD), excess body weight, energy balance behaviors, and academic performance in Greek primary schoolchildren. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary schools in Athens, Greece. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 528 students (256 boys and 272 girls), 10-12 years of age, were recruited from 21 primary schools in the area of Athens, Greece. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Students completed a specifically designed energy balance behaviors questionnaire together with the KIDMED index, which evaluates the degree of adherence to the MeD. The teacher assessed academic performance through a specifically designed, 5-scale questionnaire. Standard anthropometric measurements were also taken. ANALYSIS: Block stepwise regression analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Adherence to the MeD (ß = .140; P = .001), obesity (ß = -.095; P = .001), physical activity levels (ß = .206; P = .001), hours of sleep (ß = .100; P = .003), television viewing (ß = -.068; P = .05), and global self-esteem levels (ß = .122; P = .001) are significant factors in predicting academic performance in primary schoolchildren. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Poor adherence to the MeD, obesity, and low physical activity levels seem to negatively affect academic performance in children. Understanding these interrelationships could facilitate the formation of policies focused on improving children's academic achievement.


Subject(s)
Diet, Mediterranean , Educational Status , Motor Activity , Body Mass Index , Body Weight , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Greece/epidemiology , Health Behavior , Humans , Male , Obesity , Students/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...