Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Med ; 83(4B): 44-9, 1987 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3318428

ABSTRACT

This report summarizes the results of a 17-investigator multicenter six-month randomized double-blind parallel group study. The safety and efficacy of nabumetone 1,000 mg taken at bedtime was compared with that of aspirin 900 mg four times daily in the treatment of adult patients with active class II or III classical or definite rheumatoid arthritis. Two hundred sixty-four patients were entered into the study. Two hundred fifty-seven (126 nabumetone and 131 aspirin) patients were evaluable for safety. Two hundred thirty-four (113 nabumetone and 121 aspirin) patients were evaluable for efficacy. There was significant improvement in each of six clinical measurements of efficacy in both treatment groups and little difference between groups. The somewhat greater improvement in articular index and duration of morning stiffness in the nabumetone-treated group did not reach statistical significance. There was an equal percentage of patient withdrawal for lack of efficacy in each group. Overall, the rate of patient withdrawal due to adverse experiences was greater (p = 0.01) for aspirin-treated patients. These experiences were usually dispepsia, abdominal pain, and tinnitus. It was concluded that nabumetone was an effective anti-inflammatory drug in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with less toxicity than aspirin.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Butanones/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Aspirin/adverse effects , Butanones/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nabumetone , Random Allocation
2.
Am J Med ; 83(4B): 78-81, 1987 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3318434

ABSTRACT

A six-month, multicenter, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of two therapeutic regimens in 332 patients with osteoarthritis. The patients received either 1,000 mg of nabumetone as a single bedtime dose or 900 mg of aspirin in four divided doses. At the end of the study, patients in both treatment groups showed significant improvement from baseline for all five parameters; no statistically or clinically significant differences were observed between the groups. The safety data did reveal clinically and statistically significant differences between the groups. Aspirin-treated patients experienced a greater frequency of withdrawal from the study because of adverse experiences (34 percent versus 13 percent), a greater incidence of having at least one treatment-related adverse experience (73 percent versus 52 percent), a greater percentage of patients with at least one moderate or severe treatment-related adverse experience (47 percent versus 22 percent), and a greater percentage of patients with treatment-related adverse experiences affecting the gastrointestinal system (43 percent versus 32 percent) or the inner ear (32 percent versus 10 percent). The results of this study demonstrated that nabumetone, 1,000 mg at bedtime, is as efficacious as aspirin, 900 mg four times daily, produces fewer adverse effects, and is indicated in the treatment of osteoarthritis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Butanones/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Aspirin/adverse effects , Butanones/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nabumetone , Patient Dropouts , Random Allocation
3.
J Rheumatol ; 6(3): 316-23, 1979.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-490526

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of tonsillectomy and appendectomy was higher in 196 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), prior to the onset of articular disease, than in their spouses and siblings. The estimated increased risk of developing RA with tonsillectomy was 1.5 and 3.5 times, with appendectomy 1.7 and 6.6 times, and with both surgical procedures 2.3 and 6.7 times, using patient-spouse and patient-sibling matched-pair data, respectively. However, only with patient-sibling data did the lower limits of the 95% confidence interval for the risk ratio exceed 1.0. Several hypotheses are offered to explain the possible association between these surgical procedures and RA.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/etiology , Tonsillectomy/adverse effects , Adult , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/genetics , Female , Humans , Male , Risk , Time Factors
4.
Ann Intern Med ; 73(5): 857-8, 1970 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5476221
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...