Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Blood ; 143(21): 2152-2165, 2024 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38437725

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Effective T-cell responses not only require the engagement of T-cell receptors (TCRs; "signal 1"), but also the availability of costimulatory signals ("signal 2"). T-cell bispecific antibodies (TCBs) deliver a robust signal 1 by engaging the TCR signaling component CD3ε, while simultaneously binding to tumor antigens. The CD20-TCB glofitamab redirects T cells to CD20-expressing malignant B cells. Although glofitamab exhibits strong single-agent efficacy, adding costimulatory signaling may enhance the depth and durability of T-cell-mediated tumor cell killing. We developed a bispecific CD19-targeted CD28 agonist (CD19-CD28), RG6333, to enhance the efficacy of glofitamab and similar TCBs by delivering signal 2 to tumor-infiltrating T cells. CD19-CD28 distinguishes itself from the superagonistic antibody TGN1412, because its activity requires the simultaneous presence of a TCR signal and CD19 target binding. This is achieved through its engineered format incorporating a mutated Fc region with abolished FcγR and C1q binding, CD28 monovalency, and a moderate CD28 binding affinity. In combination with glofitamab, CD19-CD28 strongly increased T-cell effector functions in ex vivo assays using peripheral blood mononuclear cells and spleen samples derived from patients with lymphoma and enhanced glofitamab-mediated regression of aggressive lymphomas in humanized mice. Notably, the triple combination of glofitamab with CD19-CD28 with the costimulatory 4-1BB agonist, CD19-4-1BBL, offered substantially improved long-term tumor control over glofitamab monotherapy and respective duplet combinations. Our findings highlight CD19-CD28 as a safe and highly efficacious off-the-shelf combination partner for glofitamab, similar TCBs, and other costimulatory agonists. CD19-CD28 is currently in a phase 1 clinical trial in combination with glofitamab. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05219513.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific , Antigens, CD19 , Antigens, CD20 , CD28 Antigens , Immunotherapy , Humans , CD28 Antigens/immunology , CD28 Antigens/agonists , Animals , Mice , Antibodies, Bispecific/pharmacology , Antigens, CD19/immunology , Antigens, CD20/immunology , Immunotherapy/methods , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Mice, Inbred NOD
2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 27(14): 4036-4053, 2021 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33771854

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: CD40 agonists hold great promise for cancer immunotherapy (CIT) as they enhance dendritic cell (DC) activation and concomitant tumor-specific T-cell priming. However, the broad expression of CD40 accounts for sink and side effects, hampering the efficacy of anti-CD40 antibodies. We hypothesized that these limitations can be overcome by selectively targeting CD40 agonism to the tumor. Therefore, we developed a bispecific FAP-CD40 antibody, which induces CD40 stimulation solely in presence of fibroblast activation protein α (FAP), a protease specifically expressed in the tumor stroma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: FAP-CD40's in vitro activity and FAP specificity were validated by antigen-presenting cell (APC) activation and T-cell priming assays. In addition, FAP-CD40 was tested in subcutaneous MC38-FAP and KPC-4662-huCEA murine tumor models. RESULTS: FAP-CD40 triggered a potent, strictly FAP-dependent CD40 stimulation in vitro. In vivo, FAP-CD40 strongly enhanced T-cell inflammation and growth inhibition of KPC-4662-huCEA tumors. Unlike nontargeted CD40 agonists, FAP-CD40 mediated complete regression of MC38-FAP tumors, entailing long-term protection. A high dose of FAP-CD40 was indispensable for these effects. While nontargeted CD40 agonists induced substantial side effects, highly dosed FAP-CD40 was well tolerated. FAP-CD40 preferentially accumulated in the tumor, inducing predominantly intratumoral immune activation, whereas nontargeted CD40 agonists displayed strong systemic but limited intratumoral effects. CONCLUSIONS: FAP-CD40 abrogates the systemic toxicity associated with nontargeted CD40 agonists. This enables administration of high doses, essential for overcoming CD40 sink effects and inducing antitumor immunity. Consequently, FAP-targeted CD40 agonism represents a promising strategy to exploit the full potential of CD40 signaling for CIT.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , CD40 Antigens/agonists , Endopeptidases/drug effects , Immunotherapy/methods , Membrane Proteins/drug effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Animals , Mice , Tumor Cells, Cultured
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...