Performance of EasyBreath Decathlon Snorkeling mask for delivering continuous positive airway pressure.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the need for noninvasive respiratory support devices has dramatically increased, sometimes exceeding hospital capacity. The full-face Decathlon snorkeling mask, EasyBreath (EB mask), has been adapted to deliver continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as an emergency respiratory interface. We aimed to assess the performance of this modified EB mask and to test its use during different gas mixture supplies. CPAP set at 5, 10, and 15 cmH2O was delivered to 10 healthy volunteers with a high-flow system generator set at 40, 80, and 120 L min-1 and with a turbine-driven ventilator during both spontaneous and loaded (resistor) breathing. Inspiratory CO2 partial pressure (PiCO2), pressure inside the mask, breathing pattern and electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) were measured at all combinations of CPAP/flows delivered, with and without the resistor. Using the high-flow generator set at 40 L min-1, the PiCO2 significantly increased and the system was unable to maintain the target CPAP of 10 and 15 cmH2O and a stable pressure within the respiratory cycle; conversely, the turbine-driven ventilator did. EAdi significantly increased with flow rates of 40 and 80 L min-1 but not at 120 L min-1 and with the turbine-driven ventilator. EB mask can be safely used to deliver CPAP only under strict constraints, using either a high-flow generator at a flow rate greater than 80 L min-1, or a high-performance turbine-driven ventilator.

Comparing airways clearance techniques in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis: positive expiratory pressure or temporary positive expiratory pressure? A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Airway clearance techniques include positive expiratory pressure, commonly used in our clinical practice, and a recently introduced temporary positive expiratory pressure device called UNIKO®. It is unclear which one provides the best benefit to patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this observational 4-year study was to retrospectively compare the efficacy of and specific indications for temporary positive expiratory pressure compared to positive expiratory pressure in a standard rehabilitation program. METHOD: We retrospectively collected data from 162 subjects (107 males, mean age 70±9 years, 97 with primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 65 with bronchiectasis), 51 treated with temporary positive expiratory pressure and 111 with positive expiratory pressure. RESULTS: Subjects showed significant improvement in ratio of partial pressure arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen (p<0.001), forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second, peak expiratory flow, arterial oxygen saturation, and partial pressure arterial oxygen with no significant difference between positive expiratory pressure and temporary positive expiratory pressure groups apart from forced expiratory flow, which increased only in the positive expiratory pressure group. Evaluating specific subgroups, temporary positive expiratory pressure was more effective than positive expiratory pressure in improving gas transfer in subjects with emphysema and in those on oxygen therapy, as the effective supplement oxygen flow decreased significantly (p=0.034 and 0.046 respectively for temporary positive expiratory pressure vs. positive expiratory pressure). In subjects on mechanical ventilation, positive expiratory pressure was superior to temporary positive expiratory pressure in increasing forced expiratory flow (p=0.018). CONCLUSION: The physiological parameters of both groups improved significantly and similarly. Subgroup analysis suggests that temporary positive expiratory pressure could provide some advantage to subjects with emphysema and those on oxygen therapy, while positive expiratory pressure would benefit patients on mechanical ventilation. Randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm our preliminary results indicating that different subgroups/phenotypes can benefit more from one type of treatment.

Endothelin inhibitors lower pulmonary vascular resistance and improve functional capacity in patients with Fontan circulation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of endothelin inhibitors (ERAs) on hemodynamic and functional parameters in patients post-Fontan procedure with high pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). METHODS: Among our cohort of patients with Fontan circulation, 8 children, 8 adolescents, and 8 adults had PVR ≥2 WU*m2. These patients were treated with ERAs (minors with bosentan, adults with macitentan) and reevaluated after 6 months. Pre- and posttreatment hemodynamic variables were assessed by cardiac catheterization. Functional capacity was evaluated by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Our primary endpoint was to obtain a reduction of PVR; the secondary endpoint was to obtain an improvement of functional capacity. RESULTS: Under treatment, New York Heart Association class improved for adolescents and adults. PVR decreased (P = .01) in all groups: in children from the median value 2.3 (interquartile range 2.0-3.1) to 1.9 (1.4-2.3) WU*m2, in adolescents from 2.3 (2.1-2.4) to 1.7 (1.4-1.8) WU*m2, and in adults from 2.8 (2.0-4.7) to 2.1 (1.8-2.8)WU*m2. In 71% of patients, PVR fell to less than 2 WU*m2. Cardiac index increased in adolescents from 2.6 (2.4-3.3) to 3.6 (3.4-4.3) L/min/m2, P = .04, and in adults from 2.1 (2.0-2.3) to 2.8 (2.3-4.7) L/min/m2, P = .03. CPET showed that only adolescents displayed a significant functional improvement. Anaerobic threshold improved from 17 (13-19) to 18 (13-20) mL/kg/min, P = .03; oxygen consumption and VO2 max increased from 1.3 (1.0-1.6) to 1.7 (1.1-1.9) L/min, P = .02 and from 25 (21-28) to 28 (26-31) L/min, P = .02, respectively. Oxygen pulse increased from 7.9 (5.7-10.4) to 11.2 (8.2-13.0) L/beat, P = .01. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that assesses by cardiac catheterization and CPET the effects of ERA in patients with Fontan circulation with increased PVR. These results suggest that ERAs might provide most pronounced hemodynamic and functional improvement in adults and adolescents.

High-resolution computed tomography quantitation of emphysema is correlated with selected lung function values in stable COPD.

BACKGROUND: The literature shows conflicting results when high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scores of emphysema were correlated with different indices of airflow obstruction. OBJECTIVES: We correlated HRCT scores of emphysema with different indices of airflow obstruction. METHODS: We performed HRCT of the chest in 59 patients, all smokers or ex-smokers, with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease of different severity [GOLD stages I-IV; mean age ± SD 67.8 ± 7.3 years; pack/years 51.0 ± 34.6; percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)% predicted) 52.3 ± 17.6; post-bronchodilator FEV(1)% predicted 56.5 ± 19.1; FEV(1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio 50.8 ± 10.2; post-bronchodilator FEV(1)/FVC ratio 51.6 ± 11.0; percent diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO%) 59.2 ± 21.1; DLCO/percent alveolar volume (VA%) 54.5 ± 18.2; percent residual volume 163.0 ± 35.6; percent total lung capacity (TLC%) 113.2 ± 15; residual volume/TLC 1.44 ± 0.2]. All patients were in stable phase. RESULTS: The mean ± SD visual emphysema score in all patients was 25.6 ± 25.4%. There was a weak but significant correlation between the percentage of pulmonary emphysema and numbers of pack/years (R = +0.31, p = 0.024). The percentage of emphysema was inversely correlated with the FEV(1)/FVC ratio before and after bronchodilator use (R = -0.44, p = 0.002, and R = -0.39, p = 0.005), DLCO% (R = -0.64, p = 0.0003) and DLCO/VA% (R = -0.68, p < 0.0001). A weak positive correlation was also found with TLC% (R = +0.28, p = 0.048). When patients with documented emphysema were considered separately, the best significant correlation observed was between DLCO/VA% and HRCT scan score (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease of varying severity, the presence of pulmonary emphysema is best represented by the impaired gas exchange capability of the respiratory system.

Mechanisms of gas exchange response to lung volume reduction surgery in severe emphysema.

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves lung function, respiratory symptoms, and exercise tolerance in selected patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, who have heterogeneous emphysema. However, the reported effects of LVRS on gas exchange are variable, even when lung function is improved. To clarify how LVRS affects gas exchange in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 23 patients were studied before LVRS, 14 of whom were again studied afterwards. We performed measurements of lung mechanics, pulmonary hemodynamics, and ventilation-perfusion (Va/Q) inequality using the multiple inert-gas elimination technique. LVRS improved arterial Po2 (Pa(O2)) by a mean of 6 Torr (P = 0.04), with no significant effect on arterial Pco2 (Pa(CO2)), but with great variability in both. Lung mechanical properties improved considerably more than did gas exchange. Post-LVRS Pa(O2) depended mostly on its pre-LVRS value, whereas improvement in Pa(O(2)) was explained mostly by improved Va/Q inequality, with lesser contributions from both increased ventilation and higher mixed venous Po(2). However, no index of lung mechanical properties correlated with Pa(O2). Conversely, post-LVRS Pa(CO2) bore no relationship to its pre-LVRS value, whereas changes in Pa(CO2) were tightly related (r² = 0.96) to variables, reflecting decrease in static lung hyperinflation (intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure and residual volume/total lung capacity) and increase in airflow potential (tidal volume and maximal inspiratory pressure), but not to Va/Q distribution changes. Individual gas exchange responses to LVRS vary greatly, but can be explained by changes in combinations of determining variables that are different for oxygen and carbon dioxide.

Noninvasive method for measuring respiratory system compliance during pressure support ventilation.

PURPOSE: To date, few methods have been accepted for assessing the respiratory system compliance (C(rs)) in patients under assisted ventilation at the bedside. The aim of this study was to evaluate our adaptive time slice method (ATSM) to continuously calculate the C(rs). METHODS: One breath is divided into several time periods (slices). For each slice, a compliance value C(i) is calculated. The slice width is adapted according to the confidence interval of C(i). After all C(i) values are obtained and the outliers are eliminated, the C(rs) of this breath is calculated as the mean value of the remainder of C(i)'s. Seven patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease were evaluated during pressure support ventilation. The results are compared with the values calculated with the transdiaphragmatic pressure (P(di)). RESULTS: 95 ± 4% of the recorded data could be analyzed with ATSM. In 6 patients out of 7, the results delivered with ATSM and with P(di) had similar variation (standard deviation) and accuracy (difference<20%). They were strongly correlated (weighted correlation coefficient = 0.86, p<10(-5)) with a mean difference of 3.22 ml/mbar. CONCLUSIONS: The ATSM is a robust method and able to provide accurate C(rs) in spontaneously breathing patients during pressure support ventilation noninvasively without extra instrumentation or complicated maneuvers.

On-line monitoring of lung mechanics during spontaneous breathing: a physiological study.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring the mechanics of breathing in patients with advanced chronic obstructive lung diseases prior to lung transplantation is useful to characterize changes in the mechanical properties of the lungs. On-line methods of monitoring immediately process the data for clinical decisions. However, the few available methods are so far limited to monitor respiratory mechanics in ventilator-dependent patients. We investigated whether on-line monitoring of the lung mechanics, including intrinsic PEEP, was feasible in spontaneously breathing patients. METHODS: In 9 stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 11 with cystic fibrosis (CF) undergoing the procedure for the lung transplantation waiting list, we applied 2 methods of on-line monitoring (modified recursive least squares, RLS and modified multiple linear regression methods, SLS) of intrinsic PEEP (P(0)), dynamic lung elastance (E(Ldyn)) and inspiratory resistance (R(Linsp)), and compared them with an off-line graphical analysis (GA), our reference technique. RESULTS: In CF patients, there was no difference between methods, while in COPD, the median values of E(Ldyn) and R(Linsp) were significantly different between GA/SLS and GA/RLS, respectively (Dunn's, p<0.05). However, the correlation was very high for all comparisons, particularly for E(Ldyn) (R>0.98) and R(Linsp) (R>0.93). Moreover, Bland-Altman plots showed that the mean differences were consistently low and the intervals of agreement reasonable. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that on-line methods are reliable for monitoring lung mechanics in spontaneous breathing patients with severe lung diseases and could help clinicians in their decision-making process.

Helmet ventilation for acute respiratory failure and nasal skin breakdown in neuromuscular disorders.

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been widely used to decrease the complications associated with tracheal intubation in mechanically ventilated patients with neuromuscular diseases in acute respiratory failure. However, nasal ulcerations might occur when masks are used as an interface. Helmet ventilation is a possible option in this case. We describe two patients with acute respiratory failure due to Duchenne muscular dystrophy who developed nasal bridge skin necrosis during NIV. Helmet pressure support ventilation caused significant patient-ventilator asynchrony, leading to NIV intolerance. Thus, biphasic positive airway pressure delivered by helmet was applied, which improved gas exchange and patient-ventilator interaction, allowing successful NIV.

Mechanical determinants of early acute ventilatory failure in COPD patients: a physiologic study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the respiratory mechanics, breathing pattern, and pressure-generating capacity of respiratory muscles during the early phases of an acute exacerbation of COPD. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Division of Emergency Critical Care and Chronic Ventilator Unit. PATIENTS: A total of 24 COPD patients: nine patients requiring ventilatory support because of acute respiratory acidosis due to COPD exacerbation (NPPV group, pH 7.28 +/- 0.02); seven patients successfully managed with medical therapy only (SB group, pH 7.39 +/- 0.04); eight clinically stable, long term mechanically ventilated, COPD patients (IPPV group). MEASUREMENTS: Respiratory mechanics during a period of unsupported breathing. RESULTS: A rapid shallow breathing, in the presence of a high drive to breath and a high diaphragmatic tension-time index (TT(di)), was found in NPPV and IPPV groups compared to the SB group (f/V (T) ratio: 118 +/- 43 and 137 +/- 65, respectively, versus 37 +/- 12 breaths/min/L; P (0.1): 5.0 +/- 1.0 and 5.4 +/- 1.4, respectively, versus 2.2 +/- 0.2 cmH(2)O, TT(di): 0.168 +/- 0.035 and 0.161 +/- 0.039, respectively, versus 0.057 +/- 0.033); at variance, PEEPi(dyn) was greater in IPPV compared to the other two groups. A significant relationship was observed between TT(di) ratio and f/V (T) (Rho 0.756). CONCLUSION: During the early phases of an acute exacerbation, patients with COPD and acute respiratory failure had an imbalance between the decreased capacity of the respiratory muscles to generate pressure and the increased respiratory load. This imbalance was similar to that recorded in patients with COPD and chronic ventilatory failure. In both groups, the imbalance was associated with rapid shallow breathing. Among the mechanical constraints to ventilation, only PEEPi,dyn was different between acute and chronic patients with ventilatory failure.

Helmet ventilation and carbon dioxide rebreathing: effects of adding a leak at the helmet ports.

OBJECTIVE: We examined whether additional helmet flow obtained by a single-circuit and a modified plateau valve applied at the helmet expiratory port (open-circuit ventilators) improves CO(2) wash-out by increasing helmet airflow. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized physiological study in a university research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Ten healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Helmet continuous positive airway pressure and pressure support ventilation delivered by an ICU ventilator (closed-circuit ventilator) and two open-circuit ventilators equipped with a plateau valve placed either at the inspiratory or at the helmet expiratory port. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We measured helmet air leaks, breathing pattern, helmet minute ventilation (Eh)), minute ventilation washing the helmet (Ewh)), CO(2) wash-out, and ventilator inspiratory assistance. Air leaks were small and similar in all conditions. Breathing pattern was similar among the different ventilators. Inspiratory and end-tidal CO(2) were lower, while (Eh) and (Ewh) were higher only using open-circuit ventilators with the plateau valve placed at the helmet expiratory port. This occurred notwithstanding these ventilators delivered a lower inspiratory assistance. CONCLUSIONS: Additional helmet flow provided by open-circuit ventilators can lower helmet CO(2) rebreathing. However, inspiratory pressure assistance significantly decreases using open-circuit ventilators, still casting doubts on the choice of the optimal helmet ventilation setup.

Patient-ventilator interaction and sleep in mechanically ventilated patients: pressure support versus proportional assist ventilation.

OBJECTIVES: To understand the role of patient-ventilator asynchrony in the etiology of sleep disruption and determine whether optimizing patient-ventilator interactions by using proportional assist ventilation improves sleep. DESIGN: Randomized crossover clinical trial. SETTING: A tertiary university medical-surgical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients during weaning from mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive pressure support ventilation or proportional assist ventilation on the first night and then crossed over to the alternative mode for the second night. Polysomnography and measurement of light, noise, esophageal pressure, airway pressure, and flow were performed from 10 pm to 8 am. Ventilator settings (pressure level during pressure support ventilation and resistive and elastic proportionality factors during proportional assist ventilation) were set to obtain a 50% reduction of the inspiratory work (pressure time product per minute) performed during a spontaneous breathing trial. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Arousals per hour of sleep time during pressure support ventilation were 16 (range 2-74) and 9 (range 1-41) during proportional assist ventilation (p = .02). Overall sleep quality was significantly improved on proportional assist ventilation (p < .05) due to the combined effect of fewer arousals per hour, fewer awakenings per hour (3.5 [0-24] vs. 5.5 [1-24]), and greater rapid eye movement (9% [0-31] vs. 4% [0-23]), and slow wave (3% [0-16] vs. 1% [0-10]) sleep. Tidal volume and minute ventilation were lower on proportional assist ventilation, allowing for a greater increase in Paco2 during the night. Patient-ventilator asynchronies per hour were lower with proportional assist ventilation than with pressure support ventilation (24 +/- 15 vs. 53 +/- 59; p = .02) and correlated with the number of arousals per hour (R = .65, p = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient ventilator discordance causes sleep disruption. Proportional assist ventilation seems more efficacious than pressure support ventilation in matching ventilatory requirements with ventilator assistance, therefore resulting in fewer patient-ventilator asynchronies and better quality of sleep.

Noninvasive proportional assist ventilation and pressure support ventilation during arm elevation in patients with chronic respiratory failure. A preliminary, physiologic study.

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that upper limbs activity increases the respiratory workload in patients with chronic respiratory failure (CRF). The object of the present study was to investigate whether, in these patients: (i) noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) could sustain the inspiratory muscles to meet the greater ventilatory demand during upper limbs activity with the arm elevation test (AE); (ii) proportional assist ventilation (PAV) might be superior to pressure support ventilation (PSV) during AE, because of its potential more adaptable response to sudden changes in the ventilatory pattern. METHODS: The study was performed in the pulmonary function laboratory of the Pulmonary Division in Verona General Hospital, Verona, Italy. We studied 8 male patients with CRF due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Each patient received 2 treatment in random order with a crossover design: spontaneous breathing (SB), SB with AE, either PSV or PAV without and with AE, SB without and with AE, either PSV or PAV without and with AE. We measured: lung function tests, lung mechanics, ventilatory pattern and diaphragmatic effort (pressure time product, PTP(di)). RESULTS: (i) AE increases minute ventilation (+14%) and PTP(di) (+64%); (ii) ventilatory support, both with PSV and PAV unloads the diaphragm both at rest (PTP(di) -77% and -54%, respectively) and during arm elevation (PTP(di) -54% and -44%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PAV and PSV unloads the diaphragm in patients with CRF due to COPD both during SB and AE; PAV can be more efficient than PSV in assisting the diaphragm during AE in producing a greater level of minute ventilation for a similar rise in PTP(di) compared to PSV. Noninvasive ventilatory support should be considered in rehabilitation programs for training of upper limbs activity.

Effectiveness of mask and helmet interfaces to deliver noninvasive ventilation in a human model of resistive breathing.

The helmet, a transparent latex-free polyvinyl chloride cylinder linked by a metallic ring to a soft collar that seals the helmet around the neck, has been recently proposed as an effective alternative to conventional face mask to deliver pressure support ventilation (PSV) during noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. We tested the hypothesis that mechanical characteristics of the helmet (large internal volume and high compliance) might impair patient-ventilator interactions compared with standard face mask. Breathing pattern, CO(2) clearance, indexes of inspiratory muscle effort and patient-ventilator asynchrony, and dyspnea were measured at different levels of PSV delivered by face mask and helmet in six healthy volunteers before (load-off) and after (load-on) application of a linear resistor. During load-off, no differences in breathing pattern and inspiratory muscle effort were found. During load-on, the use of helmet to deliver pressure support increased inspiratory muscle effort and patient-ventilator asynchrony, worsened CO(2) clearance, and increased dyspnea compared with standard face mask. Autocycled breaths accounted for 12 and 25% of the total minute ventilation and for 10 and 23% of the total inspiratory muscle effort during mask and helmet PSV, respectively. We conclude that PSV delivered by helmet interface is less effective in unloading inspiratory muscles compared with PSV delivered by standard face mask. Other ventilatory assist modes should be tested to exploit to the most the potential benefits offered by the helmet.

Mask proportional assist vs pressure support ventilation in patients in clinically stable condition with chronic ventilatory failure.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term physiologic effects of mask pressure support ventilation (PSV) and proportional assist ventilation (PAV) in patients in clinically stable condition with chronic ventilatory failure (CVF). DESIGN: Randomized, controlled physiologic study. SETTING: Lung function units of two pulmonary rehabilitation centers. PATIENTS: Eighteen patients with CVF caused by COPD (11 patients) and restrictive chest wall diseases (RCWDs) [7 patients]. METHODS: Assessment of breathing pattern and minute ventilation (E), respiratory muscles and lung mechanics, and patient/ventilator interaction during both unassisted and assisted ventilation. After baseline assessment during spontaneous breathing (SB), mask PSV and PAV were randomly applied at the patient's comfort, with the addition of the same level of continuous positive airway pressure (2 cm H2O or 4 cm H2O in all patients), for 30 min each, with a 20-min interval of SB between periods of assisted ventilation. RESULTS: A longer time was spent to set PAV than PSV (663 +/- 179 s and 246 +/- 58 s, respectively; p < 0.001). Mean airway opening pressure (Pao) computed over a period of 1 min, but not peak Pao, was significantly lower with PAV than with PSV (151 +/- 45 cm H2O/s/min and 207 +/- 73 cm H2O/s/min, respectively; p < 0.002). Tidal volume (VT) exhibited a greater variability with PAV than with PSV (variation coefficient, 16.3% +/- 10.5% vs 11.6% +/- 7.7%, respectively; p < 0.05). Compared with SB, both modalities resulted in a significant increase in VT (by 40% and 36% with PAV and PSV, respectively, on average) and E (by 37% and 35%) with unchanged breathing frequency and duty cycle. Both modalities significantly reduced esophageal (by 39% and 51%) and diaphragmatic (by 42% and 63%) pressure-time products, respectively. Ineffective efforts were observed with neither modes of assistance in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: In resting, awake patients in clinically stable condition with CVF caused by either COPD or RCWD, noninvasive application of PAV, set at the patient's comfort, was not superior to PSV either in increasing VT and E or in unloading the inspiratory muscles. We failed to find any difference in patient/ventilator interaction between ventilatory modes.