Developing and planning country-specific integrated knowledge translation strategies: experiences from the GELA project in Malawi, Nigeria, and South Africa.

BACKGROUND: The Global Evidence, Local Adaptation (GELA) project aims to maximise the impact of research on poverty-related diseases by increasing researchers' and decision-makers' capacity to use global research to develop locally relevant guidelines for newborn and child health in Malawi, Nigeria and South Africa. To facilitate ongoing collaboration with stakeholders, we adopted an Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) approach within GELA. Given limited research on IKT in African settings, we documented our team's IKT capacity and skills, and process and experiences with developing and implementing IKT in these countries. METHODS: Six IKT champions and a coordinator formed the GELA IKT Working Group. We gathered data on our baseline IKT competencies and processes within GELA, and opportunities, challenges and lessons learned, from April 2022 to March 2023 (Year 1). Data was collected from five two-hour Working Group meetings (notes, presentation slides and video recordings); [2] process documents (flowcharts and templates); and [3] an open-ended questionnaire. Data was analysed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Three overarching themes were identified: [1] IKT approach applied within GELA [2], the capacity and motivations of IKT champions, and [3] the experiences with applying the GELA IKT approach in the three countries. IKT champions and country teams adopted an iterative approach to carry out a comprehensive mapping of stakeholders, determine stakeholders' level of interest in and influence on GELA using the Power-Interest Matrix, and identify realistic indicators for monitoring the country-specific strategies. IKT champions displayed varying capacities, strong motivation, and they engaged in skills development activities. Country teams leveraged existing relationships with their National Ministries of Health to drive responses and participation by other stakeholders, and adopted variable communication modes (e.g. email, phone calls, social media) for optimal engagement. Flexibility in managing competing interests and priorities ensured optimal participation by stakeholders, although the time and resources required by IKT champions were frequently underestimated. CONCLUSIONS: The intentional, systematic, and contextualized IKT approach carried out in the three African countries within GELA, provides important insights for enhancing the implementation, feasibility and effectiveness of other IKT initiatives in Africa and similar low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings.

Interventions for improving attraction and retention of health workers in rural and underserved areas: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Global health workforce shortages exist with disparities in the skill mix and distribution of health workers. Rural and underserved populations are often disadvantaged in terms of access to health care. METHODS: This systematic review summarized all systematic reviews that assessed interventions for improving attraction and retention of health workers in rural and underserved areas. We systematically searched selected electronic databases up to 31 March 2020. The authors independently screened the reviews, extracted data and assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. Review quality was assessed using the ROBIS tool. RESULTS: There was a paucity of evidence for the effectiveness of the various interventions. Regulatory measures were able to attract health workers to rural and underserved areas, particularly when obligations were attached to incentives. However, health workers were likely to relocate from these areas once their obligations were completed. Recruiting rural students and rural placements improved attraction and retention although most studies were without control groups, which made conclusions on effectiveness difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Cost-effective utilization of limited resources and the adoption and implementation of evidence-based health workforce policies and interventions that are tailored to meet national health system contexts and needs are essential.

Implementation of health workforce information systems: a review of eight sub-Saharan country experiences.

BACKGROUND: Globally, one of the major problems facing health systems is an acute deficit of health workforce. To ensure equitable distribution and deployment of health workers, up-to-date and timely information on the health workforce is vital. Health workforce registries (HWRs) have the potential to generate data for evidence-based human resource planning and policies. There is a lack of evaluative research on the capacity of HWRs to improve health systems. This review aims to assess the effectiveness of HWRs for improving health systems in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: We searched selected electronic databases from inception to 14 April 2020. Two authors independently screened studies and extracted data from included studies. We presented results as a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: We included eight studies of moderate-high quality in this review. The results suggest that HWRs can improve the distribution and skill-mix of the health workforce, quality of health workforce data, availability and use of data for policy and planning, and user satisfaction. The evidence was derived from case studies, which limited our ability to infer a causal relationship. CONCLUSION: More rigorous research from controlled experimental studies is needed to consolidate the available evidence from observational studies.