Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pathol Res Pract ; 248: 154623, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37331184

ABSTRACT

Neuroendocrine neoplasms represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumors, more frequently arising from gastroenteropancreatic tract and lungs. At the time of diagnosis, 20% of cases are metastatic, and 10% of cases are considered as cancer of unknown primary origin. Several immunohistochemical markers are routinely used to confirm the neuroendocrine differentiation, first among all Synaptophysin and Chromogranin-A; on the other hand, different immunohistochemical markers are used to establish primary anatomical site, as TTF1, CDX2, Islet-1 and Calcitonin, but no marker is available in order to distinguish among different sites of the digestive tract. DOG1 (discovered on GIST-1) is a gene normally expressed in interstitial cells of Cajal and, in routine practice, DOG1 immunostaining is used in diagnosis of GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumor). DOG1 expression has been described in several neoplasms other than GIST, both in mesenchymal and epithelial neoplasms. In the present study, DOG1 immunostaining has been performed in a large cohort of neuroendocrine neoplasms, including neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas, in order to evaluate frequency, intensity and pattern of expression in different anatomical site and in different tumor grade. DOG1 expression was detected in a large percentage of neuroendocrine tumors, with statistically significant association between DOG1 expression and gastrointestinal tract neuroendocrine tumors. As a consequence, DOG1 could be included in marker panel for the identification of primary site in neuroendocrine metastases of unknown primary origin; moreover, these results recommend careful evaluation of DOG1 expression in gastrointestinal neoplasms, in particular in differential diagnosis between epithelioid GIST and neuroendocrine tumors.

2.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 34(1): 57-62, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34598843

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Currently, when nodal pelvic oligorecurrent disease is detected, no standard treatment option is recommended. One possible salvage option is nodal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Here we analysed recurrence patterns after nodal SBRT in patients affected by pelvic oligometastatic relapse after radical prostatectomy, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 93 patients consecutively treated in five different institutions for pelvic oligorecurrent disease were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and imaging showing three or fewer metachronous lymphoadenopathies under aortic bifurcation. Patients underwent SBRT on all sites of disease. Concomitant ADT was allowed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 20 months (interquartile range 11-41), 57 patients had post-SBRT radiological evidence of relapse, for a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 15 months (95% confidence interval 9-24). Concomitant ADT was administered in 20 patients (21.5%). Overall, eight (8.6%), 21 (22.6%) and 28 (30.1%) patients had prostate bed only, pelvic nodal or distant relapse, respectively. The median ADT-free survival was not reached. Concomitant ADT, International Society for Urologic Pathology pattern at diagnosis < or ≥3, time to relapse ≤ or >12 months, prostate-specific antigen at recurrence < or ≥1.10 ng/ml and prostate-specific membrane antigen staging were not significantly associated with DFS. After relapse, 42 patients (45.2%) received a second SBRT course. CONCLUSION: Nodal SBRT yielded encouraging DFS and ADT-free survival in this population. Only a minority of patients developed prostate bed recurrence, suggesting that local treatment may be safely avoided. A consistent percentage of patients could be managed with a second SBRT course.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Androgen Antagonists , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies
4.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 34(1): 50-56, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34810069

ABSTRACT

AIMS: In 2018, we published early results from a cohort of patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after previous radiotherapy with definitive or postoperative intent. We sought to provide extended follow-up of this cohort to confirm the safety and efficacy of this approach in a real-world scenario. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients affected by local relapse after previous definitive or postoperative radiotherapy were treated with SBRT. Treatment provided a total dose of 30 Gy in five fractions. Data about biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS), together with adverse events, were analysed. Toxicity was reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) score v.4.03. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 48.2 months, the median BRFS was 43 months. A Gleason score >7 and concomitant androgen deprivation therapy were shown to be predictors of the worst BRFS (hazard ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.09-5.41, P = 0.02; hazard ratio 2.83, 95% confidence interval 1.17-6.8, P = 0.02, respectively). The median MFS was not reached; concomitant androgen deprivation therapy was confirmed to be predictive of the worst MFS (hazard ratio 4.75, 95% confidence interval 1.52-14.8, P = 0.007). Late grade 1 and 2 rectal and bladder toxicity occurred in three (6%) and 13 (26%) patients, respectively. One patient experienced both grade 3 acute and chronic bladder toxicity. CONCLUSION: Salvage SBRT re-irradiation after previous postoperative or definitive radiotherapy for local prostate cancer recurrence confirmed promising results in terms of oncological outcomes and the safety of this approach.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Re-Irradiation , Androgen Antagonists , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Radiosurgery/adverse effects
5.
Clin Exp Metastasis ; 38(5): 451-458, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34410545

ABSTRACT

In our institution, a prospective observational trial testing micro-RNA (miRNA) and ARV7 mutational status in metastatic, castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), is currently recruiting (PRIMERA trial, NCT04188275). A pre-planned interim analysis was performed when 50% of the planned accrual was reached. In this report, we explored the predictive value of Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) detection in mCRPC patients undergoing 1st line therapy. Moreover, ARV7, ARFL, PSMA and PSA expression on CTC was reported to explore potential correlation with patient prognosis and response to therapy. PRIMERA is a prospective observational trial enrolling mCRPC patients undergoing standard treatment (ARTA + ADT) after I line ADT failure. Clinical and pathological features were collected. Outcomes selected for this preliminary analysis were time to castration resistance (TTCR), PSA at 8 weeks after ARTA therapy start, PSA drop at 8 weeks, Overall PSA drop, PSA nadir. Correlation between these outcomes and CTC detection was tested. Expression of ARV7, ARFL, PSA and PSMA was explored in CTC+ patients to assess their prevalence in this cohort and their impact on selected outcomes. Median TTCR was significantly shorter in CTC+ vs CTC- patients (32.3 vs 75 months, respectively, p = 0.03) and in ARFL+ vs ARFL- patients (30.2 vs 51.1 months, respectively, p = 0.02). ARV7, PSMA and PSA expression on CTC had no impact on median TTCR, nor on biochemical response to therapy. Patients in whom CTC and ARFL expression were detected had significant reduced TTCR. However, PSA response was not influenced by CTCs detection and specific biomarkers expression.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Antigens, Surface/analysis , Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II/analysis , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/chemistry , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Humans , Kallikreins/blood , Male , Prospective Studies , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/mortality
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(6): 2931-2937, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33006676

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In the last months, Italy faced a COVID-19 emergency and implemented preventive measures in order to protect patients and healthcare providers from a disease outbreak. The pandemic control strategies impacted patient experience directly. Questionnaires evaluating patients reported measures (PREMs) may assess critical issues and represent a helpful tool to measure the patient perception of healthcare service. Our aim was to prospectively assess patient satisfaction about doctor-patient interaction in a high-volume radiation therapy and oncology center during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Cancer patients receiving either systemic and/or radiation treatment underwent a survey. Two validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, FACIT-TS-G version 1) and 14 specific questions evaluating patients' perception of COVID-19 measures were administered. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five patients admitted to our department from 1-30 April 2020 completed the questionnaires. The majority (66.4%) of patients were women and the most common disease was breast cancer (40%). The average Global Health Status (GHS) of EORTC QLQ-C30 was 61.67. Emotional functioning, social, and cognitive domains obtained scores of 75.48, 80.13, and 84.67, respectively. FACIT-TS-G results revealed 120 patients rated the treatments effective and 108 patients thought the side effects were the same as expected or better. Most (89.6%) rated their treatment good, very good, or excellent. Concerning COVID-19-related questions, patients reported overall very good level of information. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the introduction of strict COVID-19 control measures, there was a high level of cancer outpatient satisfaction. The satisfaction levels may influence compliance, continuity of treatments, and patient-doctor communication, impacting the quality of clinical care in the next phases of the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Quality of Life/psychology , Radiotherapy/methods , Aged , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Physician-Patient Relations , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22255541

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to show the effectiveness of a (inter / multi)disciplinary team, based on the technology developers, elderly care organizations, and designers, in developing the ASTRO robotic system for domiciliary assistance to elderly people. The main issues presented in this work concern the improvement of robot's behavior by means of a smart sensor network able to share information with the robot for localization and navigation, and the design of the robot's appearance and functionalities by means of a substantial analysis of users' requirements and attitude to robotic technology to improve acceptability and usability.


Subject(s)
Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Robotics/instrumentation , Self Care/instrumentation , Therapy, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Female , Humans , Male
8.
AIDS Patient Care STDS ; 21(7): 447-51, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17651025

ABSTRACT

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a skin cancer of neuroendocrine origin that occurs most often in sun-exposed areas. In the general population, it is a disease of older adults, with only 5% of cases occurring below the age of 50 years. Immunosuppression is the significant risk factor for the development of MCC and recently it was suggested that individuals with HIV have a relative risk of 13.4 to developed MCC in comparison with the general population. We report a case of MCC in an HIV-infected patient and we review nine patients with HIV with MCC. Our patient was a 54-year-old man who came to our attention without a known HIV diagnosis. He was apparently in good health and had no risk factor for HIV, but by the atypical site of the lesion and by the relative young age of the patient we suspected a case of immunosuppression and for this reason we did HIV test that had a positive result. The patient was treated with surgery and chemotherapy but died as a result of liver metastases 25 months after his tumor was diagnosed.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/virology , HIV Infections/complications , Skin Neoplasms/virology , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/immunology , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/immunology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...