A cost analysis of the treatment of patients with post-thrombotic syndrome in Brazil.

INTRODUCTION: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) occurs in 15-50% of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and is associated with substantial medical costs. This prospective observational study investigated the costs associated with the treatment of PTS in Brazil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 157 patients diagnosed with PTS and with a history of DVT were recruited from nine centers in Brazil. The costs of investigations and treatment for PTS over a 1-year follow-up period were analyzed. Ninety patients were available for this analysis. RESULTS: Of the 90 patients, 17 had mild-to-moderate PTS, and 73 had severe PTS. The patients with severe PTS tended to undergo more investigations and hospitalizations for PTS than those with mild-to-moderate PTS, although the differences between the two groups did not reach statistical significance. The mean annual cost of treating PTS in Brazilian Reais was 1214 R dollars (426 US dollars) for mild-to-moderate PTS and 3386 R dollars (1188 US dollars) for severe PTS. The difference was mainly due to significantly higher hospitalization costs in patients with severe PTS (704 R dollars/247 US dollars vs. 0 R dollars; p=0.044). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that PTS imposes substantial demands on health care resources in Brazil. The implementation of effective thromboprophylactic strategies could significantly reduce the incidence of DVT, and hence of PTS, potentially resulting in significant cost savings.

An open-label, comparative study of the efficacy and safety of once-daily dose of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal lower limb deep-vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) with a once-daily regimen of enoxaparin, rather than a continuous infusion of unfractionated heparin (UFH) is more convenient and allows for home care in some patients. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of these two regimens for the treatment of patients with proximal lower limb DVT. METHODS: 201 patients with proximal lower limb DVT from 13 centers in Brazil were randomized in an open manner to receive either enoxaparin [1.5 mg/kg subcutaneous (s.c.) OD] or intravenous (i.v.) UFH (adjusted to aPTT 1.5-2.5 times control) for 5-10 days. All patients also received warfarin (INR 2-3) for at least 3 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was recurrent DVT (confirmed by venography or ultrasonography), and safety endpoints included bleeding and serious adverse events. The rate of pulmonary embolism (PE) was also collected. Hospitalization was at the physician's discretion. RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics were comparable between groups. The duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter with enoxaparin than with UFH (3 versus 7 days). In addition, 36% of patients receiving enoxaparin did not need to be hospitalized, whereas all of the patients receiving UFH were hospitalized. The treatment duration was slightly longer with enoxaparin (8 versus 7 days). There was a nonsignificant trend toward a reduction in the rate of recurrent DVT with enoxaparin versus UFH, and similar safety. CONCLUSIONS: A once-daily regimen of enoxaparin 1.5 mg/kg subcutaneous is at least as effective and safe as conventional treatment with a continuous intravenous infusion of UFH. However, the once daily enoxaparin regimen is easier to administer (subcutaneous versus intravenous), does not require aPTT monitoring, and leads to both a reduced number of hospital admissions and an average 4-day-shorter hospital stay.