Cardiac pacing in severe recurrent reflex syncope and tilt-induced asystole.

AIM: The benefit of cardiac pacing in patients with severe recurrent reflex syncope and asystole induced by tilt testing has not been established. The usefulness of tilt-table test to select candidates for cardiac pacing is controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned patients aged 40 years or older who had at least two episodes of unpredictable severe reflex syncope during the last year and a tilt-induced syncope with an asystolic pause longer than 3 s, to receive either an active (pacing ON; 63 patients) or an inactive (pacing OFF; 64 patients) dual-chamber pacemaker with closed loop stimulation (CLS). The primary endpoint was the time to first recurrence of syncope. Patients and independent outcome assessors were blinded to the assigned treatment. After a median follow-up of 11.2 months, syncope occurred in significantly fewer patients in the pacing group than in the control group [10 (16%) vs. 34 (53%); hazard ratio, 0.23; P = 0.00005]. The estimated syncope recurrence rate at 1 year was 19% (pacing) and 53% (control) and at 2 years, 22% (pacing) and 68% (control). A combined endpoint of syncope or presyncope occurred in significantly fewer patients in the pacing group [23 (37%) vs. 40 (63%); hazard ratio, 0.44; P = 0.002]. Minor device-related adverse events were reported in five patients (4%). CONCLUSION: In patients aged 40 years or older, affected by severe recurrent reflex syncope and tilt-induced asystole, dual-chamber pacemaker with CLS is highly effective in reducing the recurrences of syncope. Our findings support the inclusion of tilt testing as a useful method to select candidates for cardiac pacing. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02324920, Eudamed number CIV-05-013546.

Standardized algorithm for cardiac pacing in older patients affected by severe unpredictable reflex syncope: 3-year insights from the Syncope Unit Project 2 (SUP 2) study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the long-term effects and determinants of success of cardiac pacing in patients affected by reflex syncope enrolled in the Syncope Unit Project 2 (SUP 2) study. Initial results have validated the effectiveness of a standardized guideline-based algorithm which can be used in clinical practice in order to select suitable candidates for cardiac pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective, multicentre, observational study, patients aged >40 years, affected by severe unpredictable recurrent reflex syncope, underwent carotid sinus massage (CSM), followed by tilt testing (TT) if CSM was negative, followed by implantation of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) if TT was negative. Those who had an asystolic response to one of these tests received a dual-chamber pacemaker. Of 281 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 137 (49%) received a pacemaker and were followed up for a mean of 26 ± 11 months: syncope recurred in 25 (18%) of them. At 3 years, the actuarial syncope recurrence rate was 20% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12-30] and was significantly lower than in 142 patients who did not receive a pacemaker and were observed by means of an ILR [43% (95% CI 29-57), P = 0.01]. The 3-year recurrence rate was not different among 78 CSM+, 38 TT+, and 21 ILR+ patients, whereas it was lower in 20 patients with negative TT [5% (95% CI 0-15)] than in 61 patients with positive TT [24% (95% CI 10-38)]. CONCLUSION: The benefit of cardiac pacing is maintained at 3 years, irrespective of the index diagnostic test, and is maximum in patients with negative TT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01509534.

Assessment of a standardized algorithm for cardiac pacing in older patients affected by severe unpredictable reflex syncopes.

AIMS: Opinions differ regarding the effectiveness of cardiac pacing in patients affected by reflex syncope. We assessed a standardized guideline-based algorithm in different forms of reflex syncope. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective, multi-centre, observational study, patients aged >40 years, affected by severe unpredictable recurrent reflex syncopes, underwent carotid sinus massage (CSM), followed by tilt testing (TT) if CSM was negative, followed by implantation of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) if TT was negative. Those who had an asystolic response to one of these tests received a dual-chamber pacemaker. POPULATION: 253 patients, mean age 70 ± 12 years, median 4 (3-6) syncopes, 89% without or with short prodromes. Of these patients, 120 (47%) received a pacemaker and 106 were followed up for a mean of 13 ± 7 months: syncope recurred in 10 (9%). The recurrence rate was similar in 61 CSM+ (11%), 30 TT+ (7%), and 15 ILR+ (7%) patients. The actuarial total syncope recurrence rate was 9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 6-12) at 1 year and 15% (95% CI, 10-20) at 2 years and was significantly lower than that observed in the group of 124 patients with non-diagnostic tests who had received an ILR: i.e. 22% (95% CI, 18-26) at 1 year and 37% (95% CI, 30-43) at 2 years (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: About half of older patients with severe recurrent syncopes without prodromes have an asystolic reflex for which cardiac pacing goes along with a low recurrence rate. The study supports the clinical utility of the algorithm for the selection of candidates to cardiac pacing in everyday clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01509534.