Dosing for Personalized Prophylaxis in Hemophilia A Highly Varies on the Underlying Population Pharmacokinetic Models.

BACKGROUND: Model-informed personalized prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy aimed at higher trough levels is becoming indispensable for patients with severe hemophilia A. This study aimed to identify the most suitable population pharmacokinetic (PK) models for personalized prophylaxis using various FVIII products and 2 clinical assays and to implement the most suitable one in open-access software. METHODS: Twelve published population PK models were systematically compared to predict the time above target (TaT) for a reference dosing occasion. External validation was performed using a 5-point PK data from 39 adult patients with hemophilia A with FVIII measured by chromogenic substrate (CSA) and 1-stage assays (OSAs) using NONMEM under 3 different conditions: a priori (with all FVIII samples blinded), a posteriori (with 1 trough sample), and general model fit (with all FVIII samples including the reference dosing occasion provided). RESULTS: On average, the baseline covariate models overpredicted TaT (a priori; bias -3.8 hours to 49.6 hours). When additionally including 1 previous trough FVIII sample before the reference dosing occasion (a posteriori), only 50% of the models improved in bias (-1.0 hours to 36.5 hours) and imprecision (22.4 hours and 60.7 hours). Using all the time points (general model fit), the models accurately predicted (individual TaT less than ±12 hours compared with the reference) 62%-90% and 33%-74% of the patients using CSA and OSA data, respectively. Across all scenarios, predictions using CSA data were more accurate than those using the OSA data. CONCLUSIONS: One model performed best across the population (bias: -3.8 hours a priori, -1.0 hours a posteriori , and 0.6 hours general model fit ) and acceptably predicted 44% (a priori) to 90% ( general model fit ) of the patients. To allow the community-based evaluation of patient-individual FVIII dosing, this model was implemented in the open-access model-informed precision dosing software "TDMx."

Challenges of antithrombotic therapy in the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with inherited bleeding disorders: A single-centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular events in patients with inherited bleeding disorders are challenging to manage. The risk of bleeding secondary to antithrombotic treatment must be balanced against the risk of thrombosis secondary to haemostatic therapy. METHODS: Patients with inherited bleeding disorders with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or atrial fibrillation (AF) from a single centre (2010-2018) are included. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients undergoing CABG (n = 3), PCI (n = 5) or with AF (n = 3) and a diagnosis of haemophilia A (n = 8), haemophilia B (n = 1), factor XI deficiency (n = 1) and von Willebrand disease (n = 1) managed by a multidisciplinary team are reported. In patients undergoing CABG, factor levels were normalized for 7-10 days with trough levels of 70-80% with severe patients continuing high-dose factor prophylaxis (trough 20-30%) three weeks post-operatively with daily aspirin. In a patient with mild haemophilia A and an inhibitor, recombinant factor VIIa dosing was monitored with thromboelastometry. For PCI, a 3rd-generation drug-eluting stent with one month of dual antiplatelet therapy in addition to high-dose prophylaxis as needed was preferred. Patients with AF and severe haemophilia did not receive antithrombotic treatment, and a thrombin generation assay was used to guide heparin dosing in mild haemophilia. CONCLUSION: Our experience demonstrates the importance of interdisciplinary communication to identify strategies that decrease the risk of bleeding and thrombosis. The use of extended, increased intensity prophylaxis facilitated antiplatelet therapy. Global assays may help balance the intensity of haemostatic and antithrombotic treatment.