Genetic etiologies and diagnostic methods for congenital ventriculomegaly and hydrocephalus: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Congenital hydrocephalus (CH) is a life-threatening neurological condition that results from an imbalance in production, flow, or absorption of cerebrospinal fluid. Predicted outcomes from in utero diagnosis are frequently unclear. Moreover, conventional treatments consisting primarily of antenatal and postnatal surgeries are often unsuccessful, leading to high mortality rates. Causes of CH can range from secondary insults to germline pathogenic variants, complicating diagnostic processes and treatment outcomes. Currently, an updated summary of CH genetic etiologies in conjunction with clinical testing methodologies is lacking. This review addresses this need by generating a centralized survey of known genetic causes and available molecular tests for CH. METHODS: The scoping review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework and followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was utilized to define search guidelines and screening criteria. RESULTS: Our survey revealed a high number of genetic etiologies associated with CH, ranging from single gene variants to multifactorial birth defects, and additionally uncovered diagnostic challenges that are further complicated by changes in testing approaches over the years. Furthermore, we discovered that most of the existing literature consists of case reports, underscoring the need for studies that utilize CH patient research cohorts as well as more mechanistic studies. CONCLUSIONS: The pursuit of such studies will facilitate novel gene discovery while recognizing phenotypic complexity. Addressing these research gaps could ultimately inform evidence-based diagnostic guidelines to improve patient care.

Obstructive sleep apnea during REM sleep and daytime cerebral functioning: A regional cerebral blood flow study using high-resolution SPECT.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) predominantly during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep may have impacts on brain health, even in milder OSA cases. Here, we evaluated whether REM sleep OSA is associated with abnormal daytime cerebral functioning using high-resolution single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). We tested 96 subjects (25 F, age: 65.2 ± 6.4) with a wide range of OSA severity from no OSA to severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index: 0-97 events/h). More respiratory events during REM sleep were associated with reduced daytime regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in the bilateral ventromedial prefrontal cortex and in the right insula extending to the frontal cortex. More respiratory events during non-REM (NREM) sleep were associated with reduced daytime rCBF in the left sensorimotor and temporal cortex. In subjects with a lower overall OSA severity (apnea-hypopnea index<15), more respiratory events during REM sleep were also associated with reduced daytime rCBF in the insula and extending to the frontal cortex. Respiratory events that characterized OSA during NREM versus REM sleep are associated with distinct patterns of daytime cerebral perfusion. REM sleep OSA could be more detrimental to brain health, as evidenced by reduced daytime rCBF in milder forms of OSA.

Disconnection Between Self-Reported and Objective Cognitive Impairment in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Recent studies show that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a possible contributor to abnormal cognitive decline in older adults. These new observations create the need to identify older adults with OSA who are at risk of the developing dementia if not treated. This study's goal was to verify whether self-reported cognitive complaints could become a useful tool to screen for objective cognitive deficits in late middle-aged and older adults with OSA. METHODS: Fifty-seven participants with OSA with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15 events/h (3% or arousal) and aged between 55 and 85 years were compared to 54 participants in a mild/non-OSA group on their ability to evaluate their objective cognitive functioning. They underwent overnight polysomnography followed by a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. We recruited a similar proportion of participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in both groups (OSA: 36.8%; mild/non-OSA: 35.2%). They filled out questionnaires assessing mood, sleep, and cognition. Group (OSA versus mild/non-OSA) × cognitive status (MCI versus non-MCI) analyses of variance were performed on cognitive complaint questionnaires. RESULTS: We found that among participants without objective cognitive deficits, participants in the OSA group reported more cognitive complaints compared to those in the mild/non-OSA group. Among participants with objective cognitive deficits, those in the OSA group reported less cognitive complaints compared to those in the mild/non-OSA group. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with OSA and MCI were less aware of their deficits compared to those in the mild/non-OSA group, possibly reflecting a distinctive OSA-associated cognitive impairment. Our results underscore the importance of referring patients with OSA for a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment when an abnormal cognitive decline is suspected.