ABSTRACT
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used to screen for changes in the number of DNA sequence copies in 30 primary colorectal cancers and 16 liver metastases, to identify regions that contain genes important for the development and progression of colorectal cancer. In primary colorectal cancer, we found frequent gains at 7p21 (36.7%), 7q31-36 (30%), 8q23-24 (43.0%), 12p (30%), 14q24-32 (33.3%), 16p (40.0%), 20p (33.3%), 20q (63.3%) and 21q (36.3%), while loss was often noted at 18q12-23 (36.7%). In metastatic tumors, there were significantly more gains and losses of DNA sequences than in primary tumors, with gains at 8q23-24 (found in 62.5% of recurrences vs. 43.0% of primary tumors), 15q21-26 (37.5% vs. 20.0%), 19p (43.8% vs. 20.0%) and 20q (81.3% vs. 63.3%) and losses at 18q12-23 (50.0% vs. 36.7%). The pattern of genetic changes seen in metastatic tumors, with frequent gains at 8q23-24 and 20q and loss at 18q12-23, suggests the progression of colorectal cancer. We investigated a clinical follow-up study for all patients examined by CGH and directed our attention to the genetic changes consisting of gains at 8q and 20q. The incidence of liver metastases was higher in patients with primary colorectal cancer with these genetic changes. Gains at 8q and 20q might be useful to identify patients at high risk for developing liver metastases.
Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 20 , Female , Gene Amplification , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Our recent studies indicate that omental milky spots are frequently involved in the early stage of peritoneal cancer dissemination. We have used carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-specific RT-PCR for omental milky spots to predict peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer patients. CEA mRNA was found to be positive in both 10 peritoneal washes and 16 greater omenta of 30 gastric cancer patients, including all 6 patients who showed positive results for both cytology and RT-PCR of peritoneal wash and omentum. Three of the 6 cases with positive RT-PCR in the greater omentum but not in the peritoneal wash showed recurrence of peritoneal carcinomatosa within 2 years after operation. Micrometastasis on omental milky spots was histologically confirmed in 6 of 30 gastric cancer cases. Non-specific band was detected only in the omentum of 1 case of 15 benign disease (7%), but not in peritoneal washes (0%), probably due to weak expression of CEA in mesothelial cells. Our results show that CEA-specific RT-PCR targeting micro-metastases on omental milky spots is more sensitive than targeting the peritoneal wash or conventional cytology, and suggest that this method is useful for the prediction of peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer patients.
Subject(s)
Carcinoembryonic Antigen/biosynthesis , Omentum/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ascitic Fluid/pathology , Carcinoembryonic Antigen/genetics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/immunology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/immunology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Pilot Projects , RNA, Messenger/biosynthesis , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Tumor Cells, CulturedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Genetic changes during the oncogenesis and progression of gastric cancer remain unclear. The aim of our study was to analyze chromosomal aberrations in primary gastric cancers. METHODOLOGY: Using comparative genomic hybridization, we screened 47 primary gastric cancers for changes in the number of copies of DNA sequences. RESULTS: Gains of chromosome arms 20q (55%), 20p (36%), 17q (32%), 19q (30%) and 16p (30%), and losses of chromosome arms 4q (40%), 17p (40%), 5q (38%), 18q (30%) and 4p (28%) were detected most frequently. In addition, a high level of amplification was observed at 3q21 (2%), 6p21 (4%), 7q31 (6%), 8q23-24 (2%), 19q12-13 (2%), and 20q13 (2%). Among these alterations, the gain of 20q was the most frequent change. We then compared these changes with clinicopathological factors and identified signet ring cell carcinomas in 6 cases. Our study demonstrated no amplification of chromosome 20q in signet ring cell carcinoma in contrast to that in the other histologic types of gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings may be related to the morphologic and clinical features of signet ring cell carcinoma, and several oncogenes mapped on 20q may play an important role as determinants of the clinical and histologic features of gastric cancer.
