Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
2.
J Invertebr Pathol ; 169: 107301, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31794707

ABSTRACT

Perkinsus olseni is a protozoan parasite that infects a wide variety of molluscs worldwide, causing economic losses in the aquaculture sector. In the present study, a quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay was developed for the detection and quantification of P. olseni in clam gill tissue and hemolymph (Ruditapes philippinarum and R. decussatus), and the results were compared with those of the standard diagnostic methods recommended by the O.I.E. (World Organisation for Animal Health): Ray's fluid thioglycollate culture method (RFTM), a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay and histopathology. The efficiency, sensitivity and reproducibility of the newly described qPCR assay were also determined. The highest prevalence was detected using the qPCR assay, and the strongest linear correlation was obtained between the RFTM infection levels and the threshold cycle (Ct) number from the gill tissue. Although better results were obtained from gill than from the hemolymph in the qPCR assays, especially with lower infection levels of the parasite, a significant linear correlation was observed between Ct values from the gill and hemolymph. The qPCR assay that was developed in this study showed high sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility for the detection and quantification of P. olseni.


Subject(s)
Alveolata/isolation & purification , Bivalvia/parasitology , Host-Parasite Interactions , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Animals , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reproducibility of Results
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29461206

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a new approach in patients with food allergy. Various immunological mechanisms underlie the reversal of food allergy. In this paper, we study possible changes in peripheral cytokine patterns during OIT. METHODS: Determinations of cytokines in peripheral blood were made in children who had milk or egg allergy and who received OIT. The determinations were made before and after OIT, and again following a final repeat oral challenge a month after a diet excluding the culprit food. RESULTS: No significant changes were registered in the cytokines studied (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, IFNγ, and TNF) at any of the 3 time points. Similarly, no differences in cytokine pattern were observed between children who had presented anaphylaxis during OIT and those who overcame or did not overcome the final oral challenge. DISCUSSION: Peripheral cytokines do not undergo significant changes during the OIT process. They are not predictors of serious adverse reactions or the final result of the OIT.


Subject(s)
Cytokines/blood , Egg Hypersensitivity/immunology , Egg Hypersensitivity/therapy , Eggs/adverse effects , Milk Hypersensitivity/immunology , Milk Hypersensitivity/therapy , Milk/immunology , Administration, Oral , Allergens/immunology , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Animals , Child , Cytokines/immunology , Egg Hypersensitivity/blood , Female , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Male , Milk Hypersensitivity/blood
5.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 28(1): 24-28, 2018. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-171202

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a new approach in patients with food allergy. Various immunological mechanisms underlie the reversal of food allergy. In this paper, we study possible changes in peripheral cytokine patterns during OIT. Methods: Determinations of cytokines in peripheral blood were made in children who had milk or egg allergy and who received OIT. The determinations were made before and after OIT, and again following a final repeat oral challenge a month after a diet excluding the culprit food. Results: No significant changes were registered in the cytokines studied (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, IFNγ, and TNF) at any of the 3 time points. Similarly, no differences in cytokine pattern were observed between children who had presented anaphylaxis during OIT and those who overcame or did not overcome the final oral challenge. Discussion: Peripheral cytokines do not undergo significant changes during the OIT process. They are not predictors of serious adverse reactions or the final result of the OIT (AU)


Introducción: Se ha introducido la inmunoterapia oral frente a alimentos como una nueva terapia en pacientes con alergia alimentaria. Diferentes mecanismos inmunológicos han sido descritos en un intento de explicar la reversibilidad de esta situación de alergia alimentaria. En este artículo, estudiamos los posibles cambios en el patrón de citoquinas en sangre periférica a lo largo del proceso de la inmunoterapia oral. Métodos: Se realizó determinación de citokinas en sangre periférica en tantos niños con alergia a leche o huevo que realizaron inmunoterapia oral. Las determinaciones se realizaron tanto de forma previa como tras la finalización de la OIT, así como tras una reprovocación final, un mes después de seguir una dieta exenta del alimento implicado. Resultados: No se registraron cambios significativos en las citokinas estudiadas (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, IFNγ y TNF) entre ninguna de las tres determinaciones temporales. Tampoco existieron diferencias en el patrón de citokinas entre los niños que habían presentado anafilaxias durante la OIT ni entre los que superaron o no superaron la provocación final. Discusión: Las citokinas periféricas no sufren cambios significativos a lo largo del proceso de OIT. No son factores predictivos de reacciones adversas graves ni del resultado final de la OIT (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Cytokines/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Milk Hypersensitivity/therapy , Egg Hypersensitivity/therapy , Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome
8.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27164624

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple sensitization is frequent among pollen-allergic patients. The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the ImmunoCAP ISAC 112 (ISAC112) microarray in allergy to pollen from several taxa and its clinical utility in a Spanish population. METHODS: Specific IgE was determined in 390 pollen-allergic patients using the ISAC112 microarray. Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and area under the ROC curve) was calculated for the diagnosis of allergy to pollen from grass (n=49), cypress (n=75), olive tree (n=33), plane tree (n=63), and pellitory of the wall (n=17) and compared with that of the singleplex ImmunoCAP immunoassay. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the ISAC112 microarray ranged from 68.2% for allergy to plane tree pollen to 93.9% for allergy to grass pollen. The specificity was >90%. The AUC for the diagnosis of allergy to plane tree pollen was 0.798, whereas the AUC for the remaining cases was ≥0.876. The accuracy of ISAC112 was higher than that of ImmunoCAP for plane tree pollen and similar for the remaining pollens. The frequency of sensitization to most species-specific allergenic components and profilins varied between the different geographical regions studied. A total of 73% of pollen-allergic patients were sensitized to species-specific components of more than 1 pollen type. CONCLUSIONS: The ISAC112 microarray is an accurate tool for the diagnosis of allergy to pollen from grass, cypress, olive tree, plane tree, and pellitory of the wall. The features of the ISAC112 microarray are similar or superior (in the case of plane tree pollen) to those of ImmunoCAP. This microarray is particularly useful for the etiologic diagnosis of pollinosis in patients sensitized to multiple pollen species whose pollination periods overlap.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Microarray Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Pollen/immunology , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/immunology , Adult , Allergens/classification , Area Under Curve , Female , Gene Expression , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Poaceae/immunology , Pollen/classification , Predictive Value of Tests , Profilins/blood , Profilins/genetics , ROC Curve , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/blood , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/pathology , Spain , Species Specificity , Trees/immunology
9.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27012014

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Component-based diagnosis on multiplex platforms is widely used in food allergy but its clinical performance has not been evaluated in nut allergy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of a commercial protein microarray in the determination of specific IgE (sIgE) in peanut, hazelnut, and walnut allergy. METHODS: sIgE was measured in 36 peanut-allergic, 36 hazelnut-allergic, and 44 walnut-allergic patients by ISAC 112, and subsequently, sIgE against available components was determined by ImmunoCAP in patients with negative ISAC results. ImmunoCAP was also used to measure sIgE to Ara h 9, Cora 8, and Jug r 3 in a subgroup of lipid transfer protein (LTP)-sensitized nut-allergic patients (positive skin prick test to LTP-enriched extract). sIgE levels by ImmunoCAP were compared with ISAC ranges. RESULTS: Most peanut-, hazelnut-, and walnut-allergic patients were sensitized to the corresponding nut LTP (Ara h 9, 66.7%; Cor a 8, 80.5%; Jug r 3, 84% respectively). However, ISAC did not detect sIgE in 33.3% of peanut-allergic patients, 13.9% of hazelnut-allergic patients, or 13.6% of walnut-allergic patients. sIgE determination by ImmunoCAP detected sensitization to Ara h 9, Cor a 8, and Jug r 3 in, respectively, 61.5% of peanut-allergic patients, 60% of hazelnut-allergic patients, and 88.3% of walnut-allergic patients with negative ISAC results. In the subgroup of peach LTP-sensitized patients, Ara h 9 sIgE was detected in more cases by ImmunoCAP than by ISAC (94.4% vs 72.2%, P < .05). Similar rates of Cora 8 and Jug r 3 sensitization were detected by both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of ISAC was adequate for hazelnut and walnut allergy but not for peanut allergy. sIgE sensitivity against Ara h 9 in ISAC needs to be improved.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Corylus/immunology , Juglans/immunology , Nut Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Nuts/immunology , Peanut Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Plant Proteins/immunology , Protein Array Analysis , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Intradermal Tests , Male , Mediterranean Region , Middle Aged , Nut Hypersensitivity/blood , Nut Hypersensitivity/immunology , Peanut Hypersensitivity/blood , Peanut Hypersensitivity/immunology , Predictive Value of Tests , Spain , Young Adult
10.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 46(1): 92-102, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26509363

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab (OmAb) has recently been approved for the treatment of diseases other than allergic asthma, including chronic urticaria. The exploration of the use of OmAb in chronic urticaria was based on the presence of IgE autoantibodies against autoantigens such as anti-IgE, anti-FcεRI, and IgE antibodies against thyroid peroxidase in certain patients with chronic urticaria. OmAb recognizes and sequesters free IgE to prevent its interaction with FcεRI. However, OmAb is equally and rapidly effective against autoimmune and non-autoimmune urticaria, suggesting the possible involvement of additional mechanisms of IgE. OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the in vitro mechanism of action of OmAb in mast cells and basophils. METHODS: Both LAD2 human mast cell line, previously sensitized with IgE, and ex vivo basophils were incubated with OmAb at different doses, analysing its effect on IgE-dependent events (e.g., degranulation, phosphorylation-mediated signalling, and eicosanoid release). RESULTS: We found that OmAb dissociates pre-bound IgE from mast cells and basophils, resulting in a reduction of proximal phosphorylation-mediated signalling events (Syk, PLCγ, and LAT) and in a decrease in degranulation and leukotriene synthesis. CONCLUSION: Our data prove the existence of common mechanisms of action of OmAb in mast cells and basophils that would explain its effectiveness and rapid effect in chronic urticaria and provide a basis for its use in other diseases mediated by these cells.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents/pharmacology , Basophils/drug effects , Mast Cells/drug effects , Omalizumab/pharmacology , Basophils/immunology , Basophils/metabolism , Cell Line , Cells, Cultured , Endocytosis/drug effects , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/metabolism , Immunophenotyping , Mast Cells/immunology , Mast Cells/metabolism , Phenotype , Receptors, Antigen, B-Cell/metabolism , Receptors, IgE/metabolism
11.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 26(2): 92-99, 2016. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-152598

ABSTRACT

Background: Multiple sensitization is frequent among pollen-allergic patients. The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the ImmunoCAP ISAC 112 (ISAC112) microarray in allergy to pollen from several taxa and its clinical utility in a Spanish population. Methods: Specific IgE was determined in 390 pollen-allergic patients using the ISAC112 microarray. Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and area under the ROC curve) was calculated for the diagnosis of allergy to pollen from grass (n=49), cypress (n=75), olive tree (n=33), plane tree (n=63), and pellitory of the wall (n=17) and compared with that of the singleplex ImmunoCAP immunoassay. Results: The sensitivity of the ISAC112 microarray ranged from 68.2% for allergy to plane tree pollen to 93.9% for allergy to grass pollen. The specificity was >90%. The AUC for the diagnosis of allergy to plane tree pollen was 0.798, whereas the AUC for the remaining cases was ≥0.876. The accuracy of ISAC112 was higher than that of ImmunoCAP for plane tree pollen and similar for the remaining pollens. The frequency of sensitization to most species-specific allergenic components and profilins varied between the different geographical regions studied. A total of 73% of pollen-allergic patients were sensitized to species-specific components of more than 1 pollen type. Conclusions: The ISAC112 microarray is an accurate tool for the diagnosis of allergy to pollen from grass, cypress, olive tree, plane tree, and pellitory of the wall. The features of the ISAC112 microarray are similar or superior (in the case of plane tree pollen) to those of ImmunoCAP. This microarray is particularly useful for the etiologic diagnosis of pollinosis in patients sensitized to multiple pollen species whose pollination periods overlap (AU)


Introducción: La sensibilización a múltiples pólenes es frecuente entre los pacientes alérgicos a polen. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la exactitud diagnóstica de la micromatriz ImmunoCAP ISAC 112 (ISAC112) en alergia a polen de diversos taxones y su utilidad clínica en una población española. Métodos: Se determinó IgE específica mediante ISAC112 en 390 pacientes polínicos. Se calculó su exactitud diagnóstica (sensibilidad, especificidad, valores predictivos y área bajo la curva ROC) para el diagnóstico de alergia a polen de gramíneas (n=49), ciprés (n=75), olivo (n=33), plátano de sombra (n=63) y parietaria (n=17) y se comparó con la de ImmunoCAP monocomponente (CAP). Resultados: La sensibilidad de ISAC112 osciló entre 68,2% para alergia a polen de plátano de sombra y 93,9% a polen de gramíneas. La especificidad se situó por encima del 90% en todos los casos. El área bajo la curva (AUC) de la curva ROC para diagnóstico de alergia a polen de plátano fue de 0,798. El resto de AUC fueron ≥ 0,876. La exactitud diagnóstica de ISAC112 fue superior a la de CAP para la alergia a polen de plátano de sombra y similar para el resto de pólenes estudiados. La frecuencia de sensibilización a la mayoría de componentes alergénicos genuinos y a profilinas varió entre las diferentes zonas. El 73 % de los pacientes polínicos estaban sensibilizados a componentes genuinos de más de un tipo polínico. Conclusiones: ISAC112 es una herramienta exacta para el diagnóstico de alergia al polen de gramíneas, ciprés, olivo, plátano de sombra y parietaria, con prestaciones similares o superiores, en el caso de alergia a polen de plátano de sombra, a las de CAP. Es especialmente útil para el diagnóstico etiológico de la polinosis en pacientes con sensibilizaciones a múltiples pólenes con periodos de polinización solapados (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/complications , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal , Pollen/adverse effects , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/epidemiology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/physiopathology , Immunization/methods , Allergens/analysis , Allergens/immunology , ROC Curve , Molecular Biology/methods , Molecular Biology/standards , Spain/epidemiology
12.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 26(1): 31-39, 2016. tab, ilus, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-150187

ABSTRACT

Background: Component-based diagnosis on multiplex platforms is widely used in food allergy but its clinical performance has not been evaluated in nut allergy. Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of a commercial protein microarray in the determination of specific IgE (sIgE) in peanut, hazelnut, and walnut allergy. Methods: sIgE was measured in 36 peanut-allergic, 36 hazelnut-allergic, and 44 walnut-allergic patients by ISAC 112, and subsequently, sIgE against available components was determined by ImmunoCAP in patients with negative ISAC results. ImmunoCAP was also used to measure sIgE to Ara h 9, Cor a 8, and Jug r 3 in a subgroup of lipid transfer protein (LTP)-sensitized nut-allergic patients (positive skin prick test to LTP-enriched extract). sIgE levels by ImmunoCAP were compared with ISAC ranges. Results: Most peanut-, hazelnut-, and walnut-allergic patients were sensitized to the corresponding nut LTP (Ara h 9, 66.7%; Cor a 8, 80.5%; Jug r 3, 84% respectively). However, ISAC did not detect sIgE in 33.3% of peanut-allergic patients, 13.9% of hazelnut-allergic patients, or 13.6% of walnut-allergic patients. sIgE determination by ImmunoCAP detected sensitization to Ara h 9, Cor a 8, and Jug r 3 in, respectively, 61.5% of peanut-allergic patients, 60% of hazelnut-allergic patients, and 88.3% of walnut-allergic patients with negative ISAC results. In the subgroup of peach LTP-sensitized patients, Ara h 9 sIgE was detected in more cases by ImmunoCAP than by ISAC (94.4% vs 72.2%, P<.05). Similar rates of Cor a 8 and Jug r 3 sensitization were detected by both techniques. Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of ISAC was adequate for hazelnut and walnut allergy but not for peanut allergy. sIgE sensitivity against Ara h 9 in ISAC needs to be improved (AU)


Introducción: La utilidad clínica del diagnóstico por componentes no ha sido evaluada en el estudio de la alergia a frutos secos (FS). Objetivo: Evaluar la capacidad diagnóstica de una micromatriz comercial de proteínas alergénicas en la alergia a cacahuete, avellana y nuez. Métodos: Se determinó la sIgE en pacientes alérgicos a FS mediante la micromatriz ISAC 112, e ImmunoCAP en los pacientes con sIgE negativa frente a los componentes de ISAC. Además, se realizó ImmunoCAP frente a Ara h 9, Cor a 8 y Jug r 3 en un subgrupo de pacientes sensibilizados a LTP. La sIgE detectada por ImmunoCAP fue comparada con los rangos de ISAC. Resultados: La mayoría de los alérgicos a cacahuete (66,7%), avellana (80,5%) y nuez (84%) estaba sensibilizados a su LTP. Sin embargo, no se detectó sIgE frente a los componentes de ISAC en el 33,3% de alérgicos a cacahuete, 13,9% de alérgicos a avellana y 13,6% de los alérgicos a nuez. El ImmunoCAP permitió detectar sIgE a Ara h 9 en 61,5%, Cor a 8 en 60% y Jug r 3 en 83,3% de los ISAC negativo. En el subgrupo LTP, ImmunoCAP (94,4%) fue superior a ISAC (72,2%) en la detección de sIgE a Ara h 9 (p<0,05). La sIgE frente a Cor a 8 y Jug r 3 fue detectada de forma similar por ambas técnicas. Conclusiones: La micromatriz ISAC es adecuada para el diagnóstico de alergia a avellana y nuez. La sensibilidad del componente Ara h 9 de ISAC debe ser mejorada (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Nut Hypersensitivity/immunology , Arachis/immunology , Peanut Hypersensitivity/immunology , Corylus/immunology , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunologic Tests/instrumentation , Immunologic Tests/methods , Immunologic Tests , Immunologic Techniques/methods , Immunologic Tests/classification , Immunologic Tests/statistics & numerical data , Immunologic Tests/standards , Immunologic Techniques/instrumentation , Immunologic Techniques/standards , Immunologic Techniques
13.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 24(6): 431-438, sept.-oct. 2014. tab, ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-130593

ABSTRACT

Background: Traditional diagnostic tests such as skin prick tests (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) against whole Anisakis simplex extract have low specificity. Consequently, allergy to A simplex is overdiagnosed. Objective: Our aim was to compare tests used in component-resolved diagnosis. Methods: We evaluated 34 patients with allergy to A simplex, 15 patients with acute urticaria who were sensitized to A simplex but had no clinical history of allergy to A simplex, and 10 patients allergic to seafood. SPT, sIgE (ELISA and ISAC-112), and the basophil activation test (BAT) were performed with A simplex whole extract and the molecular components rAni s 1, rAni s 3, and nPen m 1. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared with different cutoffs. Results: With the A simplex whole extract, SPT, sIgE, and BAT yielded specificity values of 72%, 68%, and 70%, respectively, with a cutoff (wheal size) of 11.2 mm, an sIgE value of 7.9 kUA/L, and a stimulation index of 1.9. Specificity increased to 100% using the molecular component rAni s 1 with SPT, sIgE by ELISA, and ISAC-112. Neither rAni s 3 sensitization nor cross-reactivity with Pen m 1 was observed in patients sensitized to A simplex. Conclusion: rAni s 1 is recognized by 100% of our patients and is able to distinguish between patients allergic to A simplex and patients with acute urticaria who are sensitized to A simplex but have no clinical history of allergy to this parasite (AU)


Introducción: Las pruebas diagnósticas tradicionales como pruebas cutáneas (PC) e IgE específica (sIgE) con el extracto completo de Anisakis simplex tienen una baja especificidad. Esto conlleva a un sobrediagnóstico de alergia a A simplex. Objetivo: Nuestro objetivo fue comparar diferentes pruebas de diagnóstico basado en componentes moleculares. Métodos: Se estudiaron 34 pacientes con alergia a A simplex, 15 con urticaria aguda sensibilizados a A simplex pero sin historia clínica compatible con alergia a A simplex y 10 alérgicos a mariscos. A todos ellos se les realizaron PC, sIgE mediante ELISA e ISAC-112 y TAB con el extracto completo de A simplex y los componentes moleculares rAni s 1, rAni s 3 y nPen m 1. Se calculó y se comparó la sensibilidad y especificidad de cada prueba con diferentes puntos de corte. Resultados: Las PC, la sIgE y el TAB con el extracto completo de A simplex mostraron una especificidad del 72%, 68% y 70% con un punto de corte de 11,2 mm de tamaño de pápula, 7,9 kUA/L de sIgE y un índice de estimulación de 1,9, respectivamente. La especificidad incrementó al 100% utilizando el componente rAni s 1en PC e sIgE mediante ELISA e ISAC-112. No se observó sensibilización a rAni s 3 ni reactividad cruzada con nPen m 1 en los pacientes sensibilizados a A simplex. Conclusión: el alérgeno rAni s 1 es reconocido por el 100% de nuestros pacientes y nos permite distinguir entre pacientes alérgicos a A simplex y pacientes con urticaria aguda sensibilizados a A simplex sin historia clínica de alergia a éste parásito (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Anisakis/immunology , Molecular Biology/methods , Urticaria/diagnosis , Urticaria/etiology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Allergens , Desensitization, Immunologic , Skin Tests , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin E/isolation & purification , ROC Curve
14.
Euro Surveill ; 19(20)2014 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24871758

ABSTRACT

A second-generation surveillance system of people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has been implemented in Spain. Behavioural and clinical data were collected between 2002 and 2011 through an annual one-day, cross-sectional survey in public hospitals, including all in- and outpatients receiving HIVrelated care on the survey day. Mean age increased over time (from 38.7 years in 2002 to 43.8 years in 2011) and 68.4% of the 7,205 subjects were male. The proportion of migrants increased from 6.1% to 15.9%, while people who inject or used to inject drugs (PWID and Ex-PWID) decreased and men who have sex with men (MSM) and heterosexuals increased. Unprotected intercourse at last sex increased among MSM and PWID/Ex-PWID. Patients receiving antiretroviral treatment increased significantly from 76.0% to 88.2% as did those with CD4 T-cell counts ≥350 (from 48.2% to 66.9%) and viral copies <200 (from 47.0% to 85.2%). HIV-infected people with hepatitis C virus RNA decreased from 36.0% in 2004 to 29.9% in 2011, while those with HBsAg remained stable at around 4.4%. Implementation of a low-cost, sustainable system for second-generation surveillance in people living with HIV is feasible. In Spain, the information obtained has helped to define and refine public health policy and document treatment effectiveness.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/epidemiology , Health Behavior , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Population Surveillance/methods , Sexual Behavior , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Adult , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/transmission , Health Surveys , Hepatitis C/transmission , Heterosexuality/statistics & numerical data , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , Spain/epidemiology
15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25668895

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traditional diagnostic tests such as skin prick tests (SPT) and specific IgE (slgE) against whole Anisakis simplex extract have low specificity. Consequently, allergy to A simplex is overdiagnosed. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare tests used in component-resolved diagnosis. METHODS: We evaluated 34 patients with allergy to A simplex, 15 patients with acute urticaria who were sensitized to A simplex but had no clinical history of allergy to A simplex, and 10 patients allergic to seafood. SPT, slgE (ELISA and ISAC-I 12), and the basophil activation test (BAT) were performed with A simplex whole extract and the molecular components rAni s 1, rAni s 3, and nPen m 1. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared with different cutoffs. RESULTS: With the A simplex whole extract, SPT, slgE, and BAT yielded specificity values of 72%, 68%, and 70%, respectively, with a cutoff (wheal size) of 11.2 mm, an slgE value of 7.9 kUAIL, and a stimulation index of 1.9. Specificity increased to 100% using the molecular component rAni s 1 with SPT, slgE by ELISA, and ISAC-112. Neither rAni s 3 sensitization nor cross-reactivity with Pen m 1 was observed in patients sensitized to A simplex. CONCLUSION: rAni s 1 is recognized by 100% of our patients and is able to distinguish between patients allergic to A simplex and patients with acute urticaria who are sensitized to A simplex but have no clinical history of allergy to this parasite.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Anisakis/immunology , Calcium-Binding Proteins/immunology , Helminth Proteins/immunology , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Skin Tests
20.
Mol Immunol ; 45(1): 218-25, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17543386

ABSTRACT

Nodavirus has become a serious pathogen for a wide range of cultured marine fish species. In the present work, the expression of genes related to immune and inflammatory responses of sea bream (Sparus aurata L.), considered as non susceptible species, was studied both in vitro and in vivo. No replication of the virus was observed in head kidney macrophages and blood leukocytes. Moreover, the enhancement of expression of several immune genes (tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), interleukin-1-beta (IL-1beta), interferon-induced Mx protein) was not detected in both head kidney macrophages and blood leucocytes in response to an in vitro infection with nodavirus. However, in vivo, nodavirus was detected 1 day post-infection (p.i.) by a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in blood, liver, head kidney and brain of experimentally infected sea bream, while its presence clearly decreased in blood after 3 days p.i. Also, a transitory increment of the expression of TNFalpha and IL-1beta was detected in the brain of intramuscular (i.m.) infected sea bream 3 days p.i. In head kidney, the over expression of TNFalpha was only observed 1 day p.i. The expression of Mx, an interferon induced gene, was increased in brain and head kidney of infected sea bream, reaching values of 1300-fold compared to controls in brain three days post-infection. For comparative purposes, we analyzed the expression of the same genes on a susceptible species, such as sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and, although the same pattern of expression was observed both in brain and kidney, the magnitude was different mainly in the case of brain, the key organ of the infection, where higher expression of TNFalpha and lower expression of Mx compared with control was observed.


Subject(s)
Bass/virology , Brain/virology , Cytokines/genetics , Fish Proteins/genetics , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Nodaviridae/physiology , Sea Bream/virology , Animals , Brain/metabolism , Cytokines/metabolism , DNA, Viral/analysis , DNA, Viral/genetics , Fish Diseases/metabolism , Fish Diseases/virology , Fish Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , Kidney/virology , Leukocytes/virology , Macrophages/virology , Nodaviridae/genetics , Nodaviridae/isolation & purification , RNA Virus Infections/metabolism , RNA Virus Infections/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Virus Replication
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...