Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Occup Environ Med ; 64(4): e211-e216, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35019893

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine violence inspections at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). METHODS: The authors examined all inspections that involved violence against workers begun by January 1, 2019. They conducted semi-structured interviews with compliance officers who had conducted inspections on a sample of facilities that received General Duty Clause (GDC) citations (n = 22) or Hazard Alert Letters (HALs) (n = 22). RESULTS: By January 1, 2019, OSHA initiated 726 "violence" inspections, with 502 (69.1%) in healthcare. In healthcare, 45 (11.1%) resulted in GDC citations and 241 (67.7%) in HALs. GDC facilities received statistically significantly lower scores in 5 of 6 domains examined through semi-structured interviews than HAL facilities. Both groups of facilities had poorly designed recordkeeping systems. CONCLUSIONS: Health care facilities continue to generate worker complaints with poorly designed violence prevention programs.


Subject(s)
Workplace Violence , Humans , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration , Workplace , Workplace Violence/prevention & control
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(26): 733-737, 2018 Jul 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29975679

ABSTRACT

Heat stress, an environmental and occupational hazard, is associated with a spectrum of heat-related illnesses, including heat stroke, which can lead to death. CDC's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) publishes recommended occupational exposure limits for heat stress (1). These limits, which are consistent with those of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) (2), specify the maximum combination of environmental heat (measured as wet bulb globe temperature [WBGT]) and metabolic heat (i.e., workload) to which workers should be exposed. Exposure limits are lower for workers who are unacclimatized to heat, who wear work clothing that inhibits heat dissipation, and who have predisposing personal risk factors (1,2). These limits have been validated in experimental settings but not at outdoor worksites. To determine whether the NIOSH and ACGIH exposure limits are protective of workers, CDC retrospectively reviewed 25 outdoor occupational heat-related illnesses (14 fatal and 11 nonfatal) investigated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) from 2011 to 2016. For each incident, OSHA assessed personal risk factors and estimated WBGT, workload, and acclimatization status. Heat stress exceeded exposure limits in all 14 fatalities and in eight of 11 nonfatal illnesses. An analysis of Heat Index data for the same 25 cases suggests that when WBGT is unavailable, a Heat Index screening threshold of 85°F (29.4°C) could identify potentially hazardous levels of workplace environmental heat. Protective measures should be implemented whenever the exposure limits are exceeded. The comprehensive heat-related illness prevention program should include an acclimatization schedule for newly hired workers and unacclimatized long-term workers (e.g., during early-season heat waves), training for workers and supervisors about symptom recognition and first aid (e.g., aggressive cooling of presumed heat stroke victims before medical professionals arrive), engineering and administrative controls to reduce heat stress, medical surveillance, and provision of fluids and shady areas for rest breaks.


Subject(s)
Heat Stress Disorders/epidemiology , Hot Temperature/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Body Temperature Regulation , Clothing/adverse effects , Female , Heat Stress Disorders/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/mortality , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Workload/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
4.
J Occup Environ Med ; 60(8): e383-e389, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29851740

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe risk factors for heat-related illness (HRI) in U.S. workers. METHODS: We reviewed a subset of HRI enforcement investigations conducted by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) from 2011 through 2016. We assessed characteristics of the workers, employers, and events. We stratified cases by severity to assess whether risk factors were more prevalent in fatal HRIs. RESULTS: We analyzed 38 investigations involving 66 HRIs. Many workers had predisposing medical conditions or used predisposing medications. Comorbidities were more prevalent in workers who died. Most (73%) fatal HRIs occurred during the first week on the job. Common clinical findings in heat stroke cases included multiorgan failure, muscle breakdown, and systemic inflammation. CONCLUSION: Severe HRI is more likely when personal susceptibilities coexist with work-related and environmental risk factors. Almost all HRIs occur when employers do not adhere to preventive guidelines.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Heat Stress Disorders/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Amphetamine-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Employment , Female , Guideline Adherence , Heat Stress Disorders/complications , Heat Stress Disorders/mortality , Humans , Inflammation/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Organ Failure/etiology , Occupational Health , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Prevalence , Rhabdomyolysis/etiology , Risk Factors , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration , Young Adult
5.
Workplace Health Saf ; 65(6): 266-272, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28557640

ABSTRACT

Commercial workplace violence (WPV) prevention training programs differ in their approach to violence prevention and the content they present. This study reviews 12 such programs using criteria developed from training topics in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Guidelines for Preventing Workplace Violence for Healthcare and Social Service Workers and a review of the WPV literature. None of the training programs addressed all the review criteria. The most significant gap in content was the lack of attention to facility-specific risk assessment and policies. To fill this gap, health care facilities should supplement purchased training programs with specific training in organizational policies and procedures, emergency action plans, communication, facility risk assessment, and employee post-incident debriefing and monitoring. Critical to success is a dedicated program manager who understands risk assessment, facility clinical operations, and program management and evaluation.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel/education , Occupational Health/education , Program Evaluation , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Humans , United States
6.
J Occup Environ Med ; 58(4): 359-63, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27058475

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to review the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) 2012 to 2013 heat enforcement cases, using identified essential elements of heat illness prevention to evaluate employers' programs and make recommendations to better protect workers from heat illness. METHODS: (1) Identify essential elements of heat illness prevention; (2) develop data collection tool; and (3) analyze OSHA 2012 to 2013 heat enforcement cases. RESULTS: OSHA's database contains 84 heat enforcement cases in 2012 to 2013. Employer heat illness prevention programs were lacking in essential elements such as providing water and shade; adjusting the work/rest proportion to allow for workload and effective temperature; and acclimatizing and training workers. CONCLUSIONS: In this set of investigations, most employers failed to implement common elements of illness prevention programs. Over 80% clearly did not rely on national standard approaches to heat illness prevention.


Subject(s)
Heat Stress Disorders/etiology , Hot Temperature/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/standards , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration , Workplace/legislation & jurisprudence , Acclimatization , Drinking Water , Heat Stress Disorders/prevention & control , Humans , Inservice Training , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Rest , United States , Workload , Workplace/organization & administration
7.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 63(31): 661-5, 2014 Aug 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25102413

ABSTRACT

Exposure to heat and hot environments puts workers at risk for heat stress, which can result in heat illnesses and death. This report describes findings from a review of 2012‒2013 Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) federal enforcement cases (i.e., inspections) resulting in citations under paragraph 5(a)(1), the "general duty clause" of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. That clause requires that each employer "furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees". Because OSHA has not issued a heat standard, it must use 5(a)(1) citations in cases of heat illness or death to enforce employers' obligations to provide a safe and healthy workplace. During the 2-year period reviewed, 20 cases of heat illness or death were cited for federal enforcement under paragraph 5(a)(1) among 18 private employers and two federal agencies. In 13 cases, a worker died from heat exposure, and in seven cases, two or more employees experienced symptoms of heat illness. Most of the affected employees worked outdoors, and all performed heavy or moderate work, as defined by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Nine of the deaths occurred in the first 3 days of working on the job, four of them occurring on the worker's first day. Heat illness prevention programs at these workplaces were found to be incomplete or absent, and no provision was made for the acclimatization of new workers. Acclimatization is the result of beneficial physiologic adaptations (e.g., increased sweating efficiency and stabilization of circulation) that occur after gradually increased exposure to heat or a hot environment. Whenever a potential exists for workers to be exposed to heat or hot environments, employers should implement heat illness prevention programs (including acclimatization requirements) at their workplaces.


Subject(s)
Heat Stress Disorders/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Heat Stress Disorders/mortality , Humans , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/mortality , United States/epidemiology , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...