Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anal Chem ; 91(19): 12399-12406, 2019 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31490662

ABSTRACT

Robust and highly specific methods for the detection of the protein toxin ricin are of interest to the law enforcement community. In previous studies, methods based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry shotgun proteomics have been proposed. The successful implementation of this approach relies on specific data evaluation criteria addressing (1) the quality of the mass spectrometric data, (2) the confidence of peptide identifications (peptide-spectrum matches), and (3) the number and sequence specificity of peptides detected. We present such data evaluation criteria and use a novel approach to establish the limit of detection for this ricin assay. Specifically, we use logistic regression to determine the probability of detection for individual ricin peptides at different concentrations. We then apply basic rules from probability theory, combining these individual peptide probabilities into an overall assay limit of detection. This procedure yields an assay limit of detection for ricin at 42.5 ng on column or 21.25 ng/µL for a 2-µL injection. We also show that, despite the conventional wisdom that detergents are deleterious to mass spectrometric analyses, the presence of Tween-20 did not prevent detection of ricin peptides, and indeed assays performed in buffers that included Tween-20 gave better results than assays performed using other buffer formulations with or without detergent removal.


Subject(s)
Limit of Detection , Proteomics/methods , Ricin/analysis , Amino Acid Sequence , Polysorbates/chemistry , Ricin/chemistry , Ricin/metabolism
2.
Toxicon ; 140: 18-31, 2017 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29031940

ABSTRACT

The toxic protein ricin (also known as RCA60), found in the seed of the castor plant (Ricinus communis) is frequently encountered in law enforcement investigations. The ability to detect ricin by analyzing its proteolytic (tryptic) peptides by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is well established. However, ricin is just one member of a family of proteins in R. communis with closely related amino acid sequences, including R. communis agglutinin I (RCA120) and other ricin-like proteins (RLPs). Inferring the presence of ricin from its constituent peptides requires an understanding of the specificity, or uniqueness to ricin, of each peptide. Here we describe the set of ricin-derived tryptic peptides that can serve to uniquely identify ricin in distinction to closely-related RLPs and to proteins from other species. Other ricin-derived peptide sequences occur only in the castor plant, and still others are shared with unrelated species. We also characterized the occurrence and relative abundance of ricin and related proteins in an assortment of forensically relevant crude castor seed preparations. We find that whereas ricin and RCA120 are abundant in castor seed extracts, other RLPs are not represented by abundant unique peptides. Therefore, the detection of peptides shared between ricin and RLPs (other than RCA120) in crude castor seed extracts most likely reflects the presence of ricin in the sample.


Subject(s)
Chemical Warfare Agents/analysis , Ricin/analysis , Ricinus communis/chemistry , Amino Acid Sequence , Chemical Warfare Agents/chemistry , Chromatography, Liquid , Peptides/analysis , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Plant Proteins/analysis , Ricin/chemistry , Seeds/chemistry , Tandem Mass Spectrometry
7.
Health Secur ; 15(1): 70-80, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28192050

ABSTRACT

There is little published data on the performance of hand-portable polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems that can be used by first responders to determine if a suspicious powder contains a potential biothreat agent. We evaluated 5 commercially available hand-portable PCR instruments for detection of Bacillus anthracis. We used a cost-effective, statistically based test plan to evaluate systems at performance levels ranging from 0.85-0.95 lower confidence bound (LCB) of the probability of detection (POD) at confidence levels of 80% to 95%. We assessed specificity using purified genomic DNA from 13 B. anthracis strains and 18 Bacillus near neighbors, potential interference with 22 suspicious powders that are commonly encountered in the field by first responders during suspected biothreat incidents, and the potential for PCR inhibition when B. anthracis spores were spiked into these powders. Our results indicate that 3 of the 5 systems achieved 0.95 LCB of the probability of detection with 95% confidence levels at test concentrations of 2,000 genome equivalents/mL (GE/mL), which is comparable to 2,000 spores/mL. This is more than sufficient sensitivity for screening visible suspicious powders. These systems exhibited no false-positive results or PCR inhibition with common suspicious powders and reliably detected B. anthracis spores spiked into these powders, though some issues with assay controls were observed. Our testing approach enables efficient performance testing using a statistically rigorous and cost-effective test plan to generate performance data that allow users to make informed decisions regarding the purchase and use of field biodetection equipment.


Subject(s)
Anthrax/diagnosis , Bacillus anthracis/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Powders/isolation & purification , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spores, Bacterial/isolation & purification
8.
Health Secur ; 15(1): 81-96, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28192054

ABSTRACT

There is little published data on the performance of biological indicator tests and immunoassays that could be used by first responders to determine if a suspicious powder contains a potential biothreat agent. We evaluated a range of biological indicator tests, including 3 protein tests, 2 ATP tests, 1 DNA test, and 1 FTIR spectroscopy instrument for their ability to screen suspicious powders for Bacillus anthracis (B. anthracis) spores and ricin. We also evaluated 12 immunoassays (mostly lateral flow immunoassays) for their ability to screen for B. anthracis and ricin. We used a cost-effective, statistically based test plan that allows instruments to be evaluated at performance levels ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 lower confidence bound of the probability of detection at confidence levels of 80% to 95%. We also assessed interference with 22 common suspicious powders encountered in the field. The detection reproducibility for the biological indicators was evaluated at 108 B. anthracis spores and 62.5 µg ricin, and the immunoassay detection reproducibility was evaluated at 107 spores/mL (B. anthracis) and 0.1 µg/mL (ricin). Seven out of 12 immunoassays met our most stringent criteria for B. anthracis detection, while 9 out of 12 met our most stringent test criteria for ricin detection. Most of the immunoassays also detected ricin in 3 different crude castor seed preparations. Our testing results varied across products and sample preparations, indicating the importance of reviewing performance data for specific instruments and sample types of interest for the application in order to make informed decisions regarding the selection of biodetection equipment for field use.


Subject(s)
Bacillus anthracis , Immunoassay/methods , Ricin , Specimen Handling , Powders , Reproducibility of Results , Spores, Bacterial/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...