The status of ART in the public health sector in Africa: a multi-country survey.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the current availability of treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the public sector in Africa, and what are the facilitators and barriers towards its provision? DESIGN: Cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative data were collected in two phases from February 2020 to October 2021. Key informants were identified from countries known to provide ART in Africa based on data from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the 2019 Surveillance from the International Federation of Fertility Societies. Quantitative data were collected via a structured questionnaire (Phase 1); public centre-specific quantitative and qualitative data were then collected via a semi-structured questionnaire followed by a virtual interview (Phase 2). Data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: Informants from 18 countries reported the existence of 185 ART centres in 16 countries. Twenty-four centres (13.0%) in 10 of 16 countries (62.5%) were public. The majority of public centres (20/22 [90.9%]) reporting on ART performed <500 ART cycles per annum. Although public institutions covered most of the cost for ART, copayments from patients were universally required. The number of ART cycles per annum was inversely correlated to the copayment. Lack of policy and legislation, high costs and bureaucratic obstacles were identified by participants as the leading challenges in the delivery of public service ART. CONCLUSION: Lack of public ART services leads to chronic and profound health inequities. Enablers of public service ART in the region are the same known to support ART services in general, namely policy and legislation, appropriate funding and good health service infrastructure. Addressing these requires the collated efforts of many stakeholders.

Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: The African Network and Registry for ART, 2018 and 2019.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What were the utilization, practices and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa in 2018 and 2019? DESIGN: Cycle-based data (CBD) and retrospective summary data were collected cross-sectionally from voluntarily participating ART centres. RESULTS: During 2018, 43,958 ART procedures were reported by 67 centres in 16 countries, increasing to 45,185 procedures reported by 70 centres in 18 countries in 2019. Autologous fresh procedures predominated at 70%, whereas autologous frozen embryo transfers (FET) increased from 21.2% to 23.1% and oocyte donation cycles remained below 10%. In 2019, the mean age of women undergoing autologous fresh embryo transfer was 33.9 years and received a mean number of 2.4 embryos per transfer. The clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per fresh embryo transfer was 42.8% in 2018 and 38.4% in 2019, with corresponding rates of 38.3% and 31.8% after FET. In both years, most ART procedures, excluding single embryo transfer (SET), were associated with a multiple delivery rate above 20%, reaching over 30% after elective dual embryo transfer in autologous cycles and after fresh oocyte donation. Multiples were predominantly born preterm with a substantially increased perinatal mortality rate. The CBD for both years showed that elective SET (eSET) achieved a high CPR without compromising safety. CONCLUSION: This third report of The African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology documents the prevailing practice of multiple embryo transfers in a cohort of relatively young women while highlighting the importance of disaggregating eSET, non-eSET and double embryo transfer. The high CPR after eSET and the increase in cryopreservation cycles are encouraging trends towards decreasing the number of embryos transferred without compromising effectiveness. Improved follow-up of ART pregnancies is required.

Assisted reproductive technology in Africa: a 5-year trend analysis from the African Network and Registry for ART.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What were the trends in utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa between 2013 and 2017? DESIGN: Cycle-based data and retrospective summary data were collected cross-sectionally from voluntarily participating ART centres. RESULTS: During the 5-year period, 153,917 ART procedures were reported from 73 centres in 18 countries. ART utilization remained low in all countries and years. Autologous fresh ART was by far the most common intervention, with little change in the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per aspiration (34.9% in 2013; 31.7% in 2017) and a consistent preponderance of young women. Oocyte donation represented less than 10% of reported procedures. Although the transfer of multiple embryos prevailed, elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) resulted in a CPR of 43.2% per transfer in fresh autologous cycles, which was notably higher compared with non-elective SET cycles (16.6%) and all dual embryo transfers (DET; 37.3%). Compared with eSET, elective DET further increased the CPR by less than 5% while raising the multiple delivery rate by 33.4%. The majority of multiples were born preterm. Many pregnancies were, however, lost to follow-up, compromising the delivery and birth outcome data. CONCLUSION: ART monitoring has been successfully established in Africa although progress must continue. Although data are not yet representative, best evidence indicates low access to ART. Perinatal outcome supports eSET, but other social determinants responsible for multiple embryo transfers are important factors to consider. Efforts must be directed at improving pregnancy follow-up. Registry data are integral to the widening of access to high-quality ART in Africa.

Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa in 2013? DESIGN: To initiate a data registry in Africa, retrospective summary data were collected in a cross-sectional survey. RESULTS: Forty ART centres from 13 countries collectively reported 25,770 initiated cycles. Regional ART utilization could not be established due to large inter-country variations and insufficient data. The pregnancy rate per aspiration for fresh non-donor IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection was 28.0% and 35.8%, with a preponderance of women under 35 years (57.3%). Deliveries were reported for only 56.1% of pregnancies; the remainder were lost to follow-up. A mean of 2.41 embryos were transferred. The multiple delivery rate was 26.7% (25.5% twins and 1.2% triplets). Most twins (52.7%) and triplets (73.7%) were born pre-term. Oocyte donation represented 7% of all fresh and frozen transfers. CONCLUSION: This marks the beginning of an ART registry in Africa, Since ART utilization could not be established, the degree of access to ART remains speculative. Pregnancy rates were favourable but underpinned by a preponderance of young women and the transfer of multiple embryos. Efforts are needed to explore treatment barriers, improve pregnancy follow-up and reduce the high rate of multiples. This inaugural report from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ANARA) indicates a willingness and ability of ART centres to voluntarily report and monitor utilization and outcomes of ART, which reflects a rising standard of ART in Africa. It is anticipated that more centres and countries will join ANARA to continue this trend.