Treatment Failure After Repair of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients Compared by "Decade of Life": An Analysis of 565 Cases in Adults Less Than 60 years of Age.

OBJECTIVES: To study the results of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in adults less than 60 years of age by comparing patients, injury, treatment, and the characteristics of treatment failure specifically according to patients' age at injury, that is, by their "decade of life" [ie, "under 30" (29 years and younger), "the 30s" (30-39 years), "the 40s" (40-49 years), and "the 50s" (50-59 years)]. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective comparative cohort series. SETTING: Twenty-six North American Level 1 Trauma Centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Skeletally mature patients aged 18-59 years with operative repair of displaced FNFs. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Main outcome measures were treatment failures (fixation failure and/or nonunion, osteonecrosis, malunion, and the need for subsequent major reconstructive surgery (arthroplasty or proximal femoral osteotomy). These were compared across decades of adult life through middle age (<30 years, 30-39 years, 40-49 years, and 50-59 years). RESULTS: Overall, treatment failure was observed in 264 of 565 (47%) of all hips. The mean age was 42.2 years, 35.8% of patients were women, and the mean Pauwels angle was 53.8 degrees. Complications and the need for major secondary surgeries increased with each increasing decade of life assessed: 36% of failure occurred in patients <30 years of age, 40% in their 30s, 48% in their 40s, and 57% in their 50s (P < 0.001). Rates of osteonecrosis increased with decades of life (under 30s and 30s vs. 40s vs. 50s developed osteonecrosis in 10%, 10%, 20%, and 27% of hips, P < 0.001), while fixation failure and/or nonunion only increased by decade of life to a level of trend (P = 0.06). Reparative methods varied widely between decade-long age groups, including reduction type (open vs. closed, P < 0.001), reduction quality (P = 0.030), and construct type (cannulated screws vs. fixed angle devices, P = 0.024), while some variables evaluated did not change with age group. CONCLUSIONS: Displaced FNFs in young and middle-aged adults are a challenging clinical problem with a high rate of treatment failure. Major complications and the need for complex reconstructive surgery increased greatly by decade of life with the patients in their sixth decade experiencing osteonecrosis at the highest rate seen among patients in the decades studied. Interestingly, treatments provided to patients in their 50s were notably different than those provided to younger patient groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Optimal Fixation Strategies for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients 18-59 Years of Age: An Analysis of 565 Cases Treated at 26 Level 1 Trauma Centers.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the difference in failure rates of surgical repair for displaced femoral neck fractures in patients younger than 60 years of age according to fixation strategy. DESIGN: This is a retrospective, comparative cohort study. SETTING: Twenty-six Level 1 North American trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients younger than 60 years of age with a displaced femoral neck fracture (OTA 31-B2, B3) undergoing surgical repair from 2005 to 2017. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Patient demographics, injury characteristics, repair methods used, and treatment failure (nonunion/failed fixation, avascular necrosis, and need for secondary surgery) were compared according to fixation strategy. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-five patients met inclusion criteria and were studied. The mean age was 42 years, 36% were female, and the average Pauwels' angle of fractures was 55 degrees. There were 305 patients treated with multiple cannulated screws (MCS) and 260 treated with a fixed-angle (FA) construct. Treatment failures were 46% overall, but was more likely to occur in MCS constructs versus FA devices (55% vs. 36%, P < 0.001). When FA constructs were substratified, the use of a sliding hip screw with addition of a medial femoral neck buttress plate (FNBP) and "antirotation" (AR) screw demonstrated better results than either FNBP or AR screw alone or neither with the lowest overall construct failure rate of 11% (P < 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Historically used fixation constructs for femoral neck fractures (eg, multiple cannulated screws and sliding hip screw) in young and middle-aged adults performed poorly compared with more recently proposed constructs, including those using a medial femoral neck buttress plate and an antirotation screw. Fixed-angle constructs outperformed multiple cannulated screws overall, and augmentation of fixed-angle constructs with a medial femoral neck buttress plate and antirotation screw improved the likelihood of successful treatment. Surgeons should prioritize fixation decisions when repairing displaced femoral neck fractures in patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Femoral Neck Fractures With Associated Ipsilateral Femoral Shaft Fractures in Young Adults <50 Years Old: A Multicenter Comparison of 80 Cases Versus Isolated Femoral Neck Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze patients, injury patterns, and treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young patients with FNFs associated with shaft fractures (assocFNFs) to improve clinical outcomes. The secondary goal was to compare this injury pattern to that of young patients with isolated FNFs (isolFNFs). DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter cohort series. SETTING: Twenty-six North American level-1 trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Skeletally mature patients, <50 years old, treated with operative fixation of an FNF with or without an associated femoral shaft fracture. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The main outcome measurement was treatment failure defined as nonunion, malunion, avascular necrosis, or subsequent major revision surgery. Odds ratios for these modes of treatment were also calculated. RESULTS: Eighty assocFNFs and 412 isolFNFs evaluated in this study were different in terms of patients, injury patterns, and treatment strategy. Patients with assocFNFs were younger (33.3 ± 8.6 vs. 37.5 ± 8.7 years old, P < 0.001), greater in mean body mass index [BMI] (29.7 vs. 26.6, P < 0.001), and more frequently displaced (95% vs. 73%, P < 0.001), "vertically oriented" Pauwels type 3, P < 0.001 (84% vs. 43%) than for isolFNFs, with all P values < 0.001. AssocFNFs were more commonly repaired with an open reduction (74% vs. 46%, P < 0.001) and fixed-angle implants (59% vs. 39%) (P < 0.001). Importantly, treatment failures were less common for assocFNFs compared with isolFNFs (20% vs. 49%, P < 0.001) with lower rates of failed fixation/nonunion and malunion (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Odds of treatment failure [odds ratio (OR) = 0.270, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.48, P < 0.001], nonunion (OR = 0.240, 95% CI, 0.10-0.57, P < 0.001), and malunion (OR = 0.920, 95% CI, 0.01-0.68, P = 0.002) were also lower for assocFNFs. Excellent or good reduction was achieved in 84.2% of assocFNFs reductions and 77.1% in isolFNFs (P = 0.052). AssocFNFs treated with fixed-angle devices performed very well, with only 13.0% failing treatment compared with 51.9% in isolFNFs treated with fixed-angle constructs (P = <0.001) and 33.3% in assocFNFs treated with multiple cannulated screws (P = 0.034). This study also identified the so-called "shelf sign," a transverse ≥6-mm medial-caudal segment of the neck fracture (forming an acute angle with the vertical fracture line) in 54% of assocFNFs and only 9% of isolFNFs (P < 0.001). AssocFNFs with a shelf sign failed in only 5 of 41 (12%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: AssocFNFs in young patients are characterized by different patient factors, injury patterns, and treatments, than for isolFNFs, and have a relatively better prognosis despite the need for confounding treatment for the associated femoral shaft injury. Treatment failures among assocFNFs repaired with a fixed-angle device occurred at a lower rate compared with isolFNFs treated with any construct type and assocFNFs treated with multiple cannulated screws. The radiographic "shelf sign" was found as a positive prognostic sign in more than half of assocFNFs and predicted a high rate of successful treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Tranexamic Acid and Holding Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Morning of Surgery Do Not Decrease Transfusion Requirements in Patients Undergoing Anterior Intrapelvic Approach for Acetabular Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine factors that may affect transfusion rates for patients requiring an anterior intrapelvic (AIP) approach for an acetabulum fracture. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective comparison study (3 trauma centers at two urban academic centers). Patients who had an AIP approach for an acetabulum fracture without other notable same-day procedures (irrigation and débridement and/or external fixation were only other allowed procedures) were included. One hundred ninety-five adult (18 and older) patients had adequate records to complete analysis with no preexisting coagulopathy. The main outcome evaluated was the number of units transfused at the time of surgery and up to 7 days after surgery. RESULTS: Factors that were found to affect intraoperative transfusion rates were older age, lower preoperative hematocrit, longer surgery duration, and requiring increased intraoperative intravenous fluids. Factors that did not affect transfusion rate included sex, body mass index, hip dislocation at the time of injury, fracture pattern, AIP approach alone or with lateral window ± distal extension, Injury Severity Score, preoperative platelet count, use of tranexamic acid, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis received morning of surgery. When followed out through the remainder of a week after surgery, the results for any factor did not change. DISCUSSION: In this large multicenter retrospective study of patients requiring an AIP approach, tranexamic acid and use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (or holding it the morning of surgery) did not affect transfusion rates either during surgery or up to a week after surgery. Older age, lower preoperative hematocrit level, longer surgery time, and increased intraoperative intravenous fluids were associated with higher transfusion rates. DATA AVAILABILITY AND TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Data are available on request. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, retrospective case-control study.

Early Treatment of Acetabular Fractures Using an Anterior Approach Increases Blood Loss but not Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether time from hospital admission to surgery for acetabular fractures using an anterior intrapelvic (AIP) approach affected blood loss. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Three level 1 trauma centers at 2 academic institutions. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adult (18 years or older) patients with no pre-existing coagulopathy treated for an acetabular fracture via an AIP approach. Excluded were those with other significant same day procedures (irrigation and debridement and external fixation were the only other allowed procedures). OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Multiple methods for evaluating blood loss were investigated, including estimated blood loss (EBL), calculated blood loss (CBL) by Gross and Hgb balance methods, and packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion requirement. Outcomes were evaluated based on time to surgery. RESULTS: 195 patients were studied. On continuous linear analysis, increasing time from admission to surgery was significantly associated with decreasing CBL at 24 hours (-1.45 mL per hour by Gross method, P = 0.003; -0.440 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance method, P = 0.003) and 3 days (-1.69 mL per hour by Gross method, P = 0.013; -0.497 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance method, P = 0.010) postoperative, but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. Using 48 hours from admission to surgery to define early versus delayed surgery, CBL was significantly greater in the early group compared to the delayed group (453 [IQR 277-733] mL early versus 364 [IQR 160-661] delayed by Gross method, P = 0.017; 165 [IQR 99-249] g of Hgb early versus 143 [IQR 55-238] g Hgb delayed by Hgb balance method, P = 0.035), but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. In addition, in multivariate linear regression, neither giving tranexamic acid nor administering prophylactic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism on the morning of surgery affected blood loss at 24 hours or 3 days postoperative ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was higher blood loss with early surgery using an AIP approach, but early surgery did not affect PRBC transfusion and may not be clinically relevant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Analysis of 101 Mechanical Failures in Distal Femur Fractures Treated with 3 Generations of Precontoured Locking Plates.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate mechanical treatment failure in a large patient cohort sustaining a distal femur fracture treated with a distal femoral locking plate (DFLP). DESIGN: This retrospective case-control series evaluated mechanical treatment failures of DFLPs. SETTING: The study was conducted at 8 Level I trauma centers from 2010 to 2017. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: One hundred one patients sustaining OTA/AO 33-A and C distal femur fractures were treated with DFLPs that experienced mechanical failure. INTERVENTION: The intervention included the treatment of a distal femur fracture with a DFLP, affected by mechanical failure (implant failure by loosening or breakage). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measures included injury and DFLP details; modes and timing of failure were studied. RESULTS: One hundred forty-six nonunions were found overall (13.4%) including 101 mechanical failures (9.3%). Failures occurred in different manners, locations, and times depending on the DFLPs. For example, 33 of 101 stainless steel (SS) plates (33%) failed by bending or breaking in the working length, whereas no Ti plates failed here ( P < 0.05). Eleven of 12 failures with titanium-Less Invasive Stabilization System (92%) occurred by lost shaft fixation, mostly by the loosening of unicortical screws (91%). Sixteen of 44 variable -angled-LCP failures (36%) occurred at the distal plate-screw junction, whereas only 5 of 61 other DFLPs (8%) failed this way ( P < 0.05). Distal failures occurred on average at 23.7 weeks compared with others that occurred at 38.4 weeks ( P < 0.05). Variable -angled-LCP distal screw-plate junction failures occurred earlier (mean 21.4 weeks). CONCLUSION: Nonunion and mechanical failure occurred in 14% and 9% of patients, respectively, in this large series of distal femur fracture treated with a DFLP. The mode, location, presence of a prosthesis, and timing of failure varied depending on the characteristics of DFLP. This information should be used to optimize implant usage and design to prolong the period of stable fixation before potential implant failures occur in patients with a prolonged time to union. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk of Postoperative Sciatic Nerve Palsy After Posterior Acetabular Fracture Fixation: Does Patient Position Matter?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the prone or lateral position is associated with postoperative sciatic nerve palsy in posterior acetabular fracture fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Three Level I trauma centers. PATIENTS: Patients with acetabular fractures treated with a posterior approach (n = 1045). INTERVENTION: Posterior acetabular fixation in the prone or lateral positions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the prevalence of postoperative sciatic nerve palsy by position. Secondary outcomes were risk factors for nerve palsy, using multiple regression analysis and propensity scoring. RESULTS: The rate of postoperative sciatic nerve palsy was 9.5% (43/455) in the prone position and 1.5% (9/590) in the lateral position ( P < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss and surgical duration were significantly higher for patients who developed a postoperative sciatic nerve palsy. Subgroup analysis showed that position did not influence palsy prevalence in posterior wall fractures. For other fracture patterns, propensity score analysis demonstrated a significantly increased odds ratio of palsy in the prone position [aOR 7.14 (2.22-23.00); P = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of posterior wall fracture patterns, the results of this study suggest that factors associated with increased risk for postoperative sciatic nerve palsy after a posterior approach are fractures treated in the prone position, increased blood loss, and prolonged operative duration. These risks should be considered alongside the other goals (eg, reduction quality) of acetabular fracture surgery when choosing surgical positioning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Treatment Failure in Femoral Neck Fractures in Adults Less Than 50 Years of Age: Analysis of 492 Patients Repaired at 26 North American Trauma Centers.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the operative results of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young adults in a large multicenter series, specifically focusing on risk factors for treatment failure. DESIGN: Large multicenter retrospective cohort series. SETTING: Twenty-six North American Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS: Skeletally mature patients younger than 50 years with displaced and nondisplaced FNFs treated between 2005 and 2017. INTERVENTION: Operative repair of FNF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome measure is treatment failure: nonunion and/or failed fixation, osteonecrosis, malunion, and need for subsequent major reconstructive surgery (arthroplasty or proximal femoral osteotomy). Logistic regression models were conducted to examine factors associated with treatment failure. RESULTS: Of 492 patients with FNFs studied, a major complication and/or subsequent major reconstructive surgery occurred in 45% (52% of 377 displaced fractures and 21% of 115 nondisplaced fractures). Overall, 23% of patients had nonunion/failure of fixation, 12% osteonecrosis type 2b or worse, 15% malunion (>10 mm), and 32% required major reconstructive surgery. Odds of failure were increased with fair-to-poor reduction [odds ratio (OR) = 5.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.41-13.31], chronic alcohol misuse (OR = 3.08, 95% CI = 1.59-6.38), comminution (OR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.69-4.13), multiple screw constructs (vs. fixed-angle devices, OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.30-2.95), metabolic bone disease (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.17-2.67), and increasing age (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01-1.06). Women (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.37-0.88), Pauwels angle ≤50 degrees (type 1 or 2; OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.41-0.98), or associated femoral shaft fracture (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.10-0.33) had lower odds of failure. CONCLUSIONS: FNFs in adults <50 years old remain a difficult clinical and surgical problem, with 45% of patients experiencing major complications and 32% undergoing subsequent major reconstructive surgery. Risk factors for complications after treatment of displaced FNFs were numerous. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anterior Pelvic Ring Fracture Pattern Predicts Subsequent Displacement in Lateral Compression Sacral Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if anterior pelvic fracture pattern in lateral compression (LC) sacral fractures correlates with subsequent displacement on examination under anesthesia (EUA) or follow-up in both nonoperative and operative cases. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty-seven skeletally mature patients with traumatic LC (OTA/AO 61B1.1, 61B2.1-2, and 61B3.1-2) pelvic ring injuries treated nonoperatively, with EUA, or with pelvic fixation were included. INTERVENTION: The study intervention included retrospective review of patients' charts and radiographs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Displacement on EUA or follow-up radiographs (both operative and nonoperative) correlated with anterior pelvic ring fracture pattern. RESULTS: Independent of sacral fracture pattern (complete or incomplete), risk of subsequent displacement on EUA or at follow-up after both nonoperative and operative treatments correlated strongly with ipsilateral superior and inferior pubic rami fractures that were either comminuted (95.6%, P < 0.001) or oblique (100%, P < 0.001). Patients with transverse or lack of inferior pubic ramus fracture did not displace (0%, P < 0.001). Out of 21 LC injuries treated with posterior-only fixation, displacement at follow-up occurred in all 11 patients (100%) with comminuted and/or oblique superior and inferior pubic rami fractures. Nakatani zone I and II rami fractures correlated most with risk of subsequent displacement. CONCLUSIONS: Unstable anterior fracture patterns are characterized as comminuted and/or oblique fractures of ipsilateral superior and inferior pubic rami. EUA should be strongly considered in these patients to disclose occult instability, for both complete and incomplete sacral fracture patterns. Additionally, these unstable anterior fracture patterns are poor candidates for posterior-only fixation and supplemental anterior fixation should be considered. Irrespective of sacral fracture pattern (complete or incomplete), nonoperative management is successful in patients with transverse or lack of inferior pubic ramus fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Low interobserver and intraobserver reliability using the Matta radiographic system for intraoperative assessment of reduction following acetabular ORIF.

INTRODUCTION: The system described by Matta for rating acetabular fracture quality of reduction following ORIF has been used extensively throughout the literature. However, the reliability of this system remains to be validated. We sought to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this system when used by fellowship-trained pelvic and acetabular surgeons to evaluate intraoperative fluoroscopy. METHODS: This is a retrospective evaluation of a prospectively collected acetabular fracture database at an academic level I trauma center. The quality of reduction of all acetabular fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) between May 2013 and December 2015 was assessed using three standard intraoperative fluoroscopic views (anteroposterior and two 45˚ oblique Judets). Displacement of ≤1 mm was considered to be an anatomic reduction, 2-3 mm imperfect, and >3 mm poor according to the system described by Matta. A total of 107 acetabular fractures treated with ORIF with complete intraoperative fluoroscopic images during that time period were available for review. Acetabular fracture reductions were reviewed by the operative surgeon at the time of surgery and subsequently reviewed by two fellowship-trained pelvic and acetabular surgeons. All reduction assessments were performed in a blinded fashion. The primary outcome measure was interobserver reliability for assessing reduction quality. This was evaluated using a weighted kappa (κw) statistic between each evaluator and the operative surgeon and a generalized kappa (κg) for all 3 surgeons. After a 6-week "washout interval," the surgeons reviewed the images again and intraobserver agreement was calculated using a weighted kappa statistic. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability based on the initial assessment was low (κg = 0.09); however, did slightly improve with the second assessment to fair (κg = 0.24). Intraobserver reliability ranged from slight (κw = 0.20) to moderate (κw = 0.53) among the surgeons. DISCUSSION: Low interobserver and intraobserver reliability was found when quality of reduction was assessed with intraoperative fluoroscopic images by the operative and two other pelvic and acetabular surgeons using the Matta system. Given the importance of an anatomic reduction on functional and radiographic outcomes, an accurate and reliable system for assessing intraoperative quality of reduction is essential.

Smart fracture plate for quantifying fracture healing: Preliminary efficacy in a biomechanical model.

The diagnosis of fracture nonunion following plate osteosynthesis is subjective and frequently ambiguous. Initially following osteosynthesis, loads applied to the bone are primarily transmitted through the plate. However, as callus stiffness increases, the callus is able to bear load proportional to its stiffness while forces through the plate decrease. The purpose of this study was to use a "smart" fracture plate to distinguish between phases of fracture healing by measuring forces transmitted through the plate. A wireless force sensor and small adapter were placed on the outside of a distal femoral locking plate. The adapter converts the slight bending of the plate under axial load into a transverse force which is measurable by the sensor. An osteotomy was created and then plated in the distal femur of biomechanical Sawbones. Specimens were loaded to simulate single-leg stance first with the osteotomy defect empty (acute healing), then sequentially filled with silicone (early callus) and then polymethyl methacrylate (hard callus). There was a strong correlation between applied axial load and force measured by the "smart" plate. Data demonstrate statistically significant differences between each phase of healing with as little as 150 N of axial load applied to the femur. Forces measured in the plate were significantly different between acute (100%), early callus (66.4%), and hard callus (29.5%). This study demonstrates the potential of a "smart" fracture plate to distinguish between phases of healing. These objective data may enable early diagnosis of nonunion and enhance outcomes for patients.

Patient-Reported Outcomes for Fractures of the Acetabulum: A Comparison Between Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System and Traditional Instruments.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to compare instruments from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) with previously validated acetabulum fracture outcome instruments. METHODS: This study included adult patients presenting for routine follow-up at least 3 months after surgical treatment of an acetabulum fracture. Participants completed four different patient-reported outcomes in a randomized order: PROMIS Mobility, PROMIS Physical Function, Short Form 36 (SF-36), and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA). Primary outcomes were the correlations between instruments, floor/ceiling effects, and survey completion time. The effects of age, education, and race on survey completion time were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall strong correlations were observed between PROMIS instruments and the SMFA/SF-36 (r = 0.73 to 0.86, P < 0.05) with weaker, more moderate correlations in those with >18 months of follow-up (r = 0.41 to 0.76, P < 0.05). No instruments demonstrated notable floor or ceiling effects. The PROMIS outcomes required less time to complete (PROMIS [56 to 59 seconds] than SF-36 [5 minutes 22 seconds] and SMFA [6 minutes 35 seconds]; P < 0.001). Older individuals required more time to complete the PROMIS PF (0.5 s/yr, P = 0.03), SF-36 (2.35 s/yr, P = 0.01), and SMFA (3.85 s/yr, P < 0.01). Level of education did not affect completion time; however, African Americans took significantly longer than Caucasians to complete the SMFA and SF-36 by 151 and 164 seconds (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study supports that the PROMIS Mobility and Physical Function surveys are much more efficient instruments for evaluating patients with acetabulum fractures when compared with the SMFA and SF-36. Convergent validity of the PROMIS instruments was overall strong but weaker and more moderate in those with a long-term follow-up, and additional study is suggested for longer-term outcomes. Level of education did not influence survey completion time; however, it took markedly longer time for older individuals and African Americans to complete the SMFA and SF-36.

Proximal tibia fracture dislocations: Management and outcomes of a severe and under-recognized injury.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal tibia fracture dislocations (PTFDs) are a subset of plateau fractures with little in the literature since description by Hohl (1967) and classification by Moore (1981). We sought to evaluate reliability in diagnosis of fracture-dislocations by traumatologists and to compare their outcomes with bicondylar tibial plateau fractures (BTPFs). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study at 14 level 1 trauma centers throughout North America. In all, 4771 proximal tibia fractures were reviewed by all sites and 278 possible PTFDs were identified using the Moore classification. These were reviewed by an adjudication board of three traumatologists to obtain consensus. Outcomes included inter-rater reliability of PTFD diagnosis, wound complications, malunion, range of motion (ROM), and knee pain limiting function. These were compared to BTPF data from a previous study. RESULTS: Of 278 submitted cases, 187 were deemed PTFDs representing 4% of all proximal tibia fractures reviewed and 67% of those submitted. Inter-rater agreement by the adjudication board was good (83%). Sixty-one PTFDs (33%) were unicondylar. Eleven (6%) had ligamentous repair and 72 (39%) had meniscal repair. Two required vascular repair. Infection was more common among PTFDs than BTPFs (14% vs 9%, p = 0.038). Malunion occurred in 25% of PTFDs. ROM was worse among PTFDs, although likely not clinically significant. Knee pain limited function at final follow-up in 24% of both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: PTFDs represent 4% of proximal tibia fractures. They are often unicondylar and may go unrecognized. Malunion is common, and PTFD outcomes may be worse than bicondylar fractures.

Pediatric and Adolescent Fractures of the Acetabulum Treated With ORIF: What Are Their Functional Outcomes?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the functional outcomes of pediatric and adolescent patients (<18 year old) who sustained acetabulum fractures that were treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Thirty-four pediatric and adolescent patients underwent acetabulum fracture ORIF between 2001 and 2018. Of the operatively treated patients, 21 patients had sufficient follow-up (>6 months), one died after fixation secondary to other traumatic injuries, and 12 patients were lost to follow-up. INTERVENTION: Acetabulum fracture ORIF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The SF-36 Health Survey and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) were compared with population norms. The modified Merle d'Aubigné clinical hip score, Matta radiologic outcome, and postoperative complications were also documented. RESULTS: Functional outcome data were available at a mean of 5 years 2 months. Mean SF-36 scores were 44.8 and 50.1 for the physical component score and mental component scores, respectively, which did not differ significantly from US population norms (physical component score mean: 50, P = 0.061 and mental component score mean: 50, P = 0.973). Furthermore, the mean SMFA Bother Index score was 18.6, which is not significantly different from the population norm mean of 13.8 (P = 0.268). However, the function index mean was 31.9, which was significantly worse than the population norm mean of 12.7 (P = 0.001). Two patients with a delayed reduction (>6 hours) of an acetabulum fracture dislocation had poor outcomes related to the development of avascular necrosis and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: In this small cohort, 86% (18/21) of these patients had a favorable functional outcome with the exception of the SMFA Functional Index that was significantly less than population norms. Although long-term follow-up is needed, we advocate for operative management of pediatric and adolescent acetabulum fractures when adult displacement and instability criteria are present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Reamer Irrigator Aspirator Versus Iliac Crest Bone Grafting and Proximal Tibial Curettage: Is There a Difference in Blood Loss and Transfusion Rates?

OBJECTIVES: To compare blood loss and transfusion rates among reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA), iliac crest bone graft (ICBG), and proximal tibial curettage (PTC) for autograft harvest. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: The study included 139 adult patients treated between 2011 and 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Nonunion repair of the femur or tibia using either RIA (n = 64), ICBG (n = 59), or PTC (n = 16) for autograft. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates. RESULTS: Patient demographics, surgical indications, and medical comorbidities that affect bleeding did not differ among the groups. Estimated blood loss (mL) was significantly higher in the RIA group [RIA: 388 ± 368 (50-2000), ICBG: 286 ± 344 (10-2000), PTC: 196 mL ± 219 (10-700), P < 0.01]. The transfusion rate was also significantly higher in the RIA group (RIA 14%, ICBG 0%, PTC 0%, P < 0.01). The amount of graft obtained was higher in the RIA group (RIA = 48.3 mL, ICBG = 31.0 mL, PTC = 18.8 mL, P < 0.01), and the operative time (hours) was longer in the RIA group (RIA = 2.8, ICBG = 2.6, PTC = 1.9, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates were significantly higher in patients undergoing RIA compared with those in patients undergoing ICBG and PTC; however, the incidence of transfusion after RIA (14%) was considerably lower than previous reports. These findings suggest that the risk of transfusion after RIA is present and clinically significant but lower than previously believed, and it is likely affected by the amount of graft obtained and complexity of the nonunion repair. The risk of transfusion should be discussed with patients and the choice of RIA carefully evaluated in patients who have anemia or risk factors of bleeding. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: Does Surgeon Subspecialty Affect Perioperative Outcomes?

OBJECTIVES: To determine if surgeon subspecialty training affects perioperative outcomes for displaced femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: One health system with 2 hospitals (Level I and Level III trauma centers). PATIENT AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were treated with hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures between October 2012 and September 2017. OUTCOME MEASURES: Leg length discrepancy, femoral offset, estimated blood loss (EBL), incidence of blood transfusion, time to surgery, operative time, and length of stay. Data were analyzed based on the treating surgeon's subspecialty training [arthroplasty (A), trauma (T), other (O)]. Hierarchical regression was used to compare the groups and control for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients who received hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures were included (A = 158; T = 73; O = 61). Surgeon subspecialty had a statistically significant effect on operative time, with arthroplasty surgeons completing the procedure 9.6 minutes faster than trauma surgeons and 17.7 minutes faster than other surgeons (P < 0.01; ΔR = 0.03). Surgeon subspecialty did not significantly affect other outcomes, including leg length discrepancy (P = 0.26), femoral offset (P = 0.37), EBL (P = 0.10), incidence of transfusion (P = 0.67), time to surgery (P = 0.10), or length of stay (P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that arthroplasty-trained surgeons perform hemiarthroplasty slightly faster than other subspecialists, but subspecialty training does not affect other perioperative outcomes, including leg length discrepancy, femoral offset, EBL, transfusion rate, time to surgery, or length of stay. This suggests that hemiarthroplasty can be adequately performed by various subspecialists, and deferring treatment to an arthroplasty surgeon might not have a clinically significant benefit in the perioperative period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Nomogram for Predicting 30-day Mortality in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Femoral neck fractures in the elderly are increasingly common as a result of a growing geriatric population with 1-year mortality rates approaching 35%. While preoperative medical optimization and early time to surgery have reduced morbidity and mortality, patients with numerous medical comorbidities remain high risk for death in the perioperative period. Identifying those with greatest risk with a scoring system or nomogram may assist multidisciplinary teams in reducing mortality following hemiarthroplasty. PURPOSE: Identify predictors of 30-day mortality in elderly patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture to generate a predictive nomogram to determine the probability of post-operative mortality. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation using data from the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005 to 2014 with CPT code 27125 for hip hemiarthroplasty. Multiple factors including demographics and comorbidities were compared in patients who experienced 30-day mortality and those who did not. T-test and chi-square tests were used to analyze data and a multivariate model was generated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Advanced age (odds ratio (OR) 1.04), underweight BMI (OR 1.55), male sex (OR 1.80), reduced functional status (OR 2.04), heart failure within 30 days prior to surgery (OR 2.22), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade > 2 (OR > 2.50), disseminated cancer (OR 3.43) were all found to have statistically significant odds ratios for 30-day mortality following hemiarthroplasty. CONCLUSION: A tool based on easily identifiable risk factors, demographics, and comorbidities was developed that can help predict elderly patients who will experience mortality within 30 days of following hemiarthroplasty. In addition to identifying high risk patients, the nomogram can serve as a counseling tool for physicians to use with patients and their families to assist with better understanding of perioperative mortality risk.

Time to Surgery and Patient Mortality in Geriatric Acetabular Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether surgical intervention within 48 hours of injury results in decreased mortality in geriatric patients who have sustained acetabular fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: University Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-three patients 65 years of age and older who were operatively treated for acetabular fractures between 2002 and 2017. The average age was 76 years. INTERVENTION: Operative fixation of acetabular fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Chi square tests were used to compare 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year mortality after operative intervention between patients treated within 48 hours and after 48 hours. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine predictors of mortality. RESULTS: The overall 1-year morality was 15%. When patients were grouped by time to surgery (fracture fixation within 48 hours or after 48 hours), there were no statistically significant differences in 30-day, 6-month, or 1-year mortality between groups. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, mechanism of injury, fracture pattern, Charlson comorbidity index, length of hospital stay, presence of deep vein thrombosis, or quality of reduction. In the final multivariate Cox regression model of survival, increasing age was associated with a significantly increased hazard of death with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.13) per year of age (P < 0.001). Patient sex, mechanism of injury, fracture pattern, estimated blood loss, and Charlson comorbidity index were not significant predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the clear mortality benefits of early surgical intervention in geriatric patients with proximal femur fractures, the results of our study suggest that surgical intervention after 48 hours of injury is not associated with increased mortality rates in geriatric patients with acetabular fractures. Increased mortality was independently associated with advancing age. Sex, mechanism of injury, and facture pattern were not associated with mortality. Time to surgery in geriatric patients with acetabular fractures should be determined on an individual basis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prevention of the Infected Fracture: Evidence-Based Strategies for Success!

There is a significant burden of disease associated with infected fractures, and their management is challenging. Prevention of infection after musculoskeletal trauma is essential because treatment of an established infection continues to be a major obstacle. Despite the need for evidence-based decision making, there is a lack of consensus around strategies for prevention and surgical management of the infected fracture. The current evidence for the prevention of the infected fracture is reviewed here with a focus on evidence for antibiotic therapy and debridement, the induced membrane technique, management of soft-tissue defects, patient optimization, and adjuncts to prevent infection.