Understanding patient perspectives on vaccine decision making in adults with autoimmune bullous diseases: a qualitative study.

Patients with autoimmune bullous diseases are at an increased risk of infection, both from the underlying skin disease and from immunosuppressive treatments. Limited information is available on vaccine beliefs and behaviors in dermatology patients and adults with autoimmune bullous diseases in particular. To understand vaccine decision making, identify perceived risks and benefits of vaccinations, and discuss individual experiences in patients with autoimmune bullous diseases in the United States. A qualitative study was performed utilizing semi-structured interviews, and analysis was conducted on NVivo. Patterns were identified in the coded data, and representative quotations were recorded for each major theme. Interviews were conducted between February 15, 2022 and September 15, 2022. Twenty patients with a diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, or pemphigus foliaceous were interviewed. Of the 20 participants, 14 (70%) were female, with a mean (SD, range) age of 64.8 (13.2, 34-83) years. Key themes that emerged from qualitative analysis of the interviews included patient concerns regarding their increased susceptibility to infection, potential exacerbation of skin disease following vaccination, and the effect of immunosuppressive medications on humoral response to vaccines. Lack of appointment availability, difficulty accessing vaccines, and cost were commonly identified barriers to vaccination. These findings provide valuable knowledge for dermatologists in regard to providing counseling specific to patient concerns and to improve communication surrounding vaccination in the dermatology setting.

Exploring dermatologists' perspectives on vaccines in dermatology: a qualitative study.

Vaccination rates among adults in the United States, including dermatology patients, remain suboptimal. Previous research has concluded that outpatient specialty offices often have administrative and patient-related barriers to administering vaccines in their clinics, however, this has never been examined specifically in dermatology. This study aims to examine dermatologists' perspectives on vaccine education in dermatology clinics, identify facilitators and barriers to vaccine administration in dermatology clinics, and explore strategies to improve vaccination rates in dermatology patients. Virtual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with board-certified dermatologists to explore their perspectives on vaccines in dermatology clinic. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to analyze the data. Participating dermatologists were 60% female (n = 9) and 40% male (n = 6) and had a median of 7 years of clinic experience (min-max: 3-39 years). Vaccine education emerged as one of the prominent themes during the interview with dermatologists, who emphasized the importance of comprehensive vaccine education for both healthcare providers and patients. Barriers identified encompassed patient hesitancy, lack of provider knowledge, resource limitations, and logistical challenges. Dermatologists proposed solutions such as standardized protocols, improved patient communication, enhanced coordination with other healthcare providers, and increased clinic resources. These results emphasize that dermatologists can play a crucial role in advocating for and addressing preventative care through vaccine implementation and provide a high-level framework to think about implementation. Additionally, this study highlights the need for comprehensive vaccine education, systematic implementation strategies, and organizational support within dermatology clinics to improve vaccine administration for patients.

Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Nutraceuticals for Treating Acne: A Systematic Review.

Importance: Patients with acne are interested in nutraceuticals as a potential treatment option. However, there is uncertainty regarding the efficacy and safety of these products. Objective: To evaluate the evidence for oral nutraceuticals in the treatment of acne. Evidence Review: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through January 30, 2023, to identify randomized clinical trials evaluating oral nutraceutical interventions (ie, vitamins and minerals, botanical extracts, prebiotics, and probiotics) in individuals with acne. Clinician-reported outcomes (eg, investigator global assessment, lesion counts), patient-reported outcomes (eg, quality of life), and adverse events were extracted from the included studies. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias checklist tool for randomized clinical trials. Based on the Risk of Bias tool, articles were converted to Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality standards of good, fair, or poor quality. Findings: A total of 2582 abstracts were identified in the database search, 42 of which met inclusion criteria (a total of 3346 participants). Studies of fair or good quality showed the potential benefit of vitamins B5 and D, botanical extracts (green tea), probiotics, and ω-3 fatty acids in the treatment of acne. These interventions were most frequently associated with decreased lesion counts or improved investigator global assessment scores. Adverse effects were rare for most of the therapies evaluated, but gastrointestinal tract adverse effects were reported for zinc therapy. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review suggests a possible role for nutraceutical supplements in the treatment of acne. Physicians should be prepared to discuss the evidence regarding the potential role of nutraceuticals with patients. Many studies were of small size, and future research should focus on larger randomized clinical trials to assess the utility of nutraceuticals in the treatment of acne.

The patient perspective on vaccine uptake in adults with psoriasis and eczema.

Having a chronic disease is one of the most consistent factors associated with vaccine uptake for adults in the general population, but vaccination beliefs and behaviors specific to those with chronic skin diseases have not been explored. The objective of this study was to explore factors associated with vaccine uptake and barriers to vaccination in adults with psoriasis and eczema. Virtual, video-based semi-structured interviews were performed with adults who self-reported a diagnosis of psoriasis or eczema. Interviews explored themes around healthcare decision making, perceived risks/benefits to vaccination, barriers, and vaccine knowledge. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Of 34 study participants, 25 participants (74%) were females and 9 (26%) were males, with a mean age of 50.8 years (SD: 16.4, range: 24-71 yrs). Half of participants (n = 17) had psoriasis, and half (n = 17) had eczema. Participants recognized both personal and societal benefits to vaccines. Common vaccination barriers identified were access to appointments, concerns about side effects, and misinformation. Physicians, friends/family, and media, including internet resources, were health information resources identified by patients. These results summarize the unique patient perspective around vaccine uptake in adults with eczema and psoriasis and represent an important first step in a multi-pronged approach to improve vaccination rates in adults with chronic skin diseases.

The Impact of Hidradenitis Suppurativa on Health Care Decision Making and Vaccines.

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin disease that causes significant burden for patients in multiple aspects of their life. However, the details regarding the impact on factors aside from skin are limited. Objective: We explored patient perspectives around the impact of HS on personal health and how that affects a patient's health care decision making. Methods: Individual, semi-structured, virtual interviews were conducted with adults that have HS by a trained medical student. The interviews were performed over a private, video conference platform. English speaking individuals between the ages of 18-45 with a diagnosis of HS for at least 1 year were invited to participate in the study. The transcripts were coded by the medical student and a research assistant and discrepancies were resolved by group consensus. This study followed the reporting guidelines of the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. Results: 23 participants were interviewed in which 21 participants (91%) were female and 2 participants (9%) were male. The mean age was 31.2 years. Patients expressed an increased awareness of their personal health because of their HS, including considering HS with respect to what they ate, the medications they took, the physicians they sought, and their family planning decision. Some participants stated that HS made them more likely to receive vaccines while others described the two are unrelated. Conclusions: Patients with HS considered their skin disease when making medical decisions broadly. Many specifically considered their disease when making decisions regarding health maintenance and immunizations though some did not consider the two related.