ABSTRACT
The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has significantly improved life expectancy of HIV-infected patients; nevertheless, it does not eliminate the virus from hosts, so a cure for this infection is crucial. Some strategies have employed the induction of anti-HIV CD8+ T cells. However, the high genetic variability of HIV-1 represents the biggest obstacle for these strategies, since immune escape mutations within epitopes restricted by Human Leukocyte Antigen class I molecules (HLA-I) abrogate the antiviral activity of these cells. We used a bioinformatics pipeline for the determination of such mutations, based on selection pressure and docking/refinement analyses. Fifty HIV-1 infected patients were recruited; HLA-A and HLA-B alleles were typified using sequence-specific oligonucleotide approach, and viral RNA was extracted for the amplification of HIV-1 gag, which was bulk sequenced and aligned to perform selection pressure analysis, using Single Likelihood Ancestor Counting (SLAC) and Fast Unconstrained Bayesian Approximation (FUBAR) algorithms. Positively selected sites were mapped into HLA-I-specific epitopes, and both mutated and wild type epitopes were modelled using PEP-FOLD. Molecular docking and refinement assays were carried out using AutoDock Vina 4 and FlexPepDock. Five positively selected sites were found: S54 at HLA-A*02 GC9, T84 at HLA-A*02 SL9, S125 at HLA-B*35 HY9, S173 at HLA-A*02/B*57 KS12 and I223 at HLA-B*35 HA9. Although some mutations have been previously described as immune escape mutations, the majority of them have not been reported. Molecular docking/refinement analysis showed that one combination of mutations at GC9, one at SL9, and eight at HY9 epitopes could act as immune escape mutations. Moreover, HLA-A*02-positive patients harbouring mutations at KS12, and HLA-B*35-positive patients with mutations at HY9 have significantly higher plasma viral loads than patients lacking such mutations. Thus, HLA-A and -B alleles could be shaping the genetic diversity of HIV-1 through the selection of potential immune escape mutations.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/genetics , HIV-1/immunology , Immune Tolerance , Mutation , RNA, Viral , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Colombia/epidemiology , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/genetics , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/immunology , Humans , Phenotype , Phylogeny , Selection, Genetic , Structure-Activity Relationship , Viral Load , gag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/genetics , gag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/immunologyABSTRACT
Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection represents one of the biggest public health problems worldwide. The immune response, mainly the effector mechanisms mediated by CD8+ T cells, induces the selection of mutations that allows the virus to escape the immune control. These mutations are generally selected within CD8+ T cell epitopes restricted to human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I), leading to a decrease in the presentation and recognition of the epitope, decreasing the activation of CD8+ T cells. However, these mutations may also affect cellular processing of the peptide or recognition by the T cell receptor. Escape mutations often carry a negative impact in viral fitness that is partially or totally compensated by the selection of compensatory mutations. The selection of either escape mutations or compensatory mutations may negatively affect the course of the infection. In addition, these mutations are a major barrier for the development of new therapeutic strategies focused on the induction of specific CD8+ T cell responses.
Subject(s)
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Immune Evasion , Mutation , Selection, Genetic , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/genetics , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Genetic Fitness , HIV Infections/genetics , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Several soluble factors have been reported to have the capacity of inhibiting HIV replication at different steps of the virus life cycle, without eliminating infected cells and through enhancement of specific cellular mechanisms. Yet, it is unclear if these antiviral factors play a role in the protection from HIV infection or in the control of viral replication. Here we evaluated two cohorts: i) one of 58 HIV-exposed seronegative individuals (HESNs) who were compared with 59 healthy controls (HCs), and ii) another of 13 HIV-controllers who were compared with 20 HIV-progressors. Peripheral blood, oral and genital mucosa and gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) samples were obtained to analyze the mRNA expression of ELAFIN, APOBEC3G, SAMHD1, TRIM5α, RNase 7 and SerpinA1 using real-time PCR. RESULTS: HESNs exhibited higher expression of all antiviral factors in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), oral or genital mucosa when compared with HCs. Furthermore, HIV-controllers exhibited higher levels of SerpinA1 in GALT. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the activity of these factors is compartmentalized and that these proteins have a predominant role depending on the tissue to avoid the infection, reduce the viral load and modulate the susceptibility to HIV infection.
