Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 41
Filter
1.
Health Educ Res ; 31(5): 577-86, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27422896

ABSTRACT

This analysis describes the nature of community participation in National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded community-based participatory research (CBPR) projects, and explores the scientific and social implications of variation in community participation. We conducted in-depth interviews in 2012 with professional and community researchers from 25 CBPR projects in the Southeast US. Interview topics focused on participants' experiences with the nature and conduct of their CBPR project. Projects were rated on community participation in 13 components of research. Projects varied substantially in community participation. Some projects had community participation in only two to three components; others had participation in every component. Some professional researchers were deliberate in their inclusion of community participation in all aspects of research, others had community participation in some aspects, and others were mainly concerned that community members had the opportunity to participate in the study. Findings suggest a need for a standardized rubric for community-based research that facilitates delineation of approaches and procedures that are effective and efficient. Little actual community participation may also result in negative social impacts for communities.


Subject(s)
Community-Based Participatory Research/statistics & numerical data , Research Design , Social Change , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Southeastern United States
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 57(3): 323-37, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24273087

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to present and evaluate descriptively bivariate associations between urinary metabolites of pesticides and herbicides and migrant camp conditions, violations, and personal worker behaviors at home for farmworkers who do not apply pesticides. METHODS: We studied 183 migrant farmworker camps in eastern North Carolina in 2010. Data and urine samples were collected from 371 men. Predictor measures included violations in six domains of housing regulations and nonviolation characteristics and personal behaviors that might impact urinary metabolites. RESULTS: Cockroaches and bathroom violations were predictive of increased exposure to pyrethroids and cyfluthrin/chlorpyrifos, respectively. Changing and storing clothing and shoes in sleeping rooms increased the number of detects for the diazinon metabolite. CONCLUSIONS: Farmworkers had exposures to multiple chemicals. No single housing domain was identified as critical to mitigating housing-related exposure; specific attention should be paid to changing and storing soiled clothing in sleeping rooms, and insect infestations.


Subject(s)
Herbicides/urine , Housing/statistics & numerical data , Insecticides/urine , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic Acid/urine , 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid/urine , Adolescent , Adult , Agriculture , Chlorpyrifos/urine , Community-Based Participatory Research , DEET/urine , Diazinon/urine , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Nitriles/urine , North Carolina , Pesticides/urine , Pyrethrins/urine , Transients and Migrants , Young Adult
3.
Appl Clin Inform ; 3(4): 475-87, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23646092

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Scant knowledge exists describing health care providers' and staffs' experiences sharing imaging studies. Additional research is needed to determine the extent to which imaging studies are shared in diverse health care settings, and the extent to which provider or practice characteristics are associated with barriers to viewing external imaging studies on portable media. OBJECTIVE: This analysis uses qualitative data to 1) examine how providers and their staff accessed outside medical imaging studies, 2) examine whether use or the desire to use imaging studies conducted at outside facilities varied by provider specialty or location (urban, suburban, and small town) and 3) delineate difficulties experienced by providers or staff as they attempted to view and use imaging studies available on portable media. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 85 health care providers and medical facility staff from urban, suburban, and small town medical practices in North Carolina and Virginia. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, then systematically analyzed using ATLAS.ti. RESULTS: Physicians at family and pediatric medicine practices rely primarily on written reports for medical studies other than X-rays; and thus do not report difficulties accessing outside imaging studies. Subspecialists in urban, suburban, and small towns view imaging studies through internal communication systems, internet portals, or portable media. Many subspecialists and their staff report experiencing difficulty and time delays in accessing and using imaging studies on portable media. CONCLUSION: Subspecialists have distinct needs for viewing imaging studies that are not shared by typical primary care providers. As development and implementation of technical strategies to share medical records continue, this variation in need and use should be noted. The sharing and viewing of medical imaging studies on portable media is often inefficient and fails to meet the needs of many subspeciality physicians, and can lead to repeated imaging studies.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Health Facilities , Information Dissemination/methods , Physicians , Cities , Compact Disks , Data Display , Suburban Population
4.
J Agric Saf Health ; 14(1): 79-92, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18376537

ABSTRACT

This study tests basic predictions from the demands-control model of occupational stress in Latino immigrant farmworkers. Cross-sectional data were obtained from 151 farmworkers in eastern North Carolina via face-to-face interviews conducted in Spanish during the summer of 2005. Results suggest that farmwork is characterized by low psychological demand and low control, or that it is a "passive job." Multivariate analyses provided little support for predictions. Isometric load, an indicator of physical job demands reflecting how frequently workers maintain awkward postures for long periods, was associated with poorer physical health, and high worker control was associated with better mental health. However, pace of work, an indicator of psychological job demand, was unassociated with physical and mental health, and physical exertion, another indicator of physical job demand, was not robustly associated with health outcomes. The results suggest that core predictions from the demands-control model do not hold for immigrant farmworkers, and they foreshadow possible ways of refining the model.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Internal-External Control , Job Satisfaction , Occupational Health , Quality of Life/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Workforce , Workload
5.
J Agric Saf Health ; 13(4): 407-18, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18075016

ABSTRACT

Skin diseases are common among farmworkers, yet little research documents their prevalence and risk factors. This analysis documents the prevalence of skin diseases among farmworkers in North Carolina, examines variation in the prevalence across the agricultural season, and delineates factors associated with skin disease. Data are from a longitudinal surveillance study with assessments at approximately three-week intervals from May through October 2005. The sample included 304 farmworkers from 45 camps with 1048 data points. Data collection included a structured interview and a standard set often digital photographs. A board-certified dermatologist reviewed the photographs and made specific diagnoses in five categories: inflammatory disease, infection, pigmentary disorder, tumor, and trauma. The prevalences of the five skin disease categories and specific diagnoses are described with counts and frequencies for the entire season and for six time periods. The inflammatory disease and infectious disease categories are modeled with an extension of logistic regression that accounts for repeated measures and clustering of farmworkers within camps. Farmworkers experience high levels of inflammatory skin disease (57.2%) including acne, folliculitis, and contact dermatitis; infectious skin disease (73.8%) including tinea pedis, onychomycosis, and warts; pigmentary disorders (19.1%); and trauma (34.5%). The odds of inflammatory skin disease decreased with age, while those for infectious skin disease increased with age. The odds of inflammatory skin disease increased with pesticide exposure and decreasing housing quality. Skin diseases are highly prevalent among farmworkers. Research is needed to delineate specific factors causing high levels of infection and inflammation in this population.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Agriculture , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/etiology , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , North Carolina/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Skin Diseases/etiology , Skin Diseases/pathology
6.
J Agric Saf Health ; 13(3): 323-37, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17892074

ABSTRACT

Substandard housing poses risks for health and safety. Few studies have documented the housing conditions experienced by Latino farmworker families in the U.S. The purpose of this analysis is to assess the quality of housing occupied by farmworker families in eastern North Carolina and determine how individual and family characteristics are associated with housing quality. Interviews were completed in six North Carolina counties with 186 Latino farmworker households that included a child under the age of 18 to document respondent, household, and dwelling characteristics. Most households were crowded, with 69.4% having more than one person per room (excluding bathrooms and kitchens). Dwellings were often located adjacent to fields (46.0%), suffered from structural problems (e.g., 18.3% had roof leaks), and lacked facilities and appliances (e.g., 26.9% did not have a working oven). Most farmworker family dwellings did not meet the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's minimum criteria for health and safety. Respondents in their thirties, who lived in North Carolina for less than five years, moved two or more times in the past year to follow crops, and lived in grower-provided housing had the poorest housing quality. These results demonstrate that North Carolina Latino farmworker families lack adequate housing. Further research is needed to evaluate farmworker housing conditions in all areas of the U.S., and to document the relationship of these housing conditions to health outcomes. The collaboration of researchers, advocates, policy makers, housing developers, health care providers, and educators is needed to improve the housing conditions of farmworker families.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Family/ethnology , Housing/standards , Transients and Migrants , Adult , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Male , North Carolina , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
J Agric Saf Health ; 13(1): 45-55, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17370913

ABSTRACT

Oral health deficits can have a significant effect on workers' general health and their ability to carry out normal activities. Although farmworkers have been found to lack access to dental care, few studies have documented their oral health status or its impact on quality of life (QOL). This research (1) describes the oral health problems experienced and oral health care received by Latino farmworkers in North Carolina, and (2) explores the association between oral health and QOL. Data were collected using face-to-face interviews from a representative sample of 151 farmworkers; data included oral health-related QOL (OHIP-14) and general health-related QOL (SF-12 Health Survey). Workers reported a high number of unmet needs: 52% reported caries, and 33% reported missing teeth. Only 21% had received dental services in the past year, almost all in Mexico rather than the U.S. The dimensions of oral health-related QOL most impaired were psychological discomfort and physical pain caused by dental problems. Number of functional oral health problems was the strongest predictor of oral health-related QOL (p < 0.001) and physical health-related QOL (p < 0.05), but was unrelated to mental health-related QOL. These findings indicate that the high rate of unmet oral health needs is associated with poorer farmworker QOL. The consequences of suffering on-going dental pain for work performance, sleep, and nutritional status are unknown. Because national data indicate that fewer farmworkers are returning to their countries of origin, communities with large farmworker populations need to address their unmet needs for dental care.


Subject(s)
Dental Care/standards , Dental Health Services , Health Services Accessibility , Oral Health/standards , Quality of Life , Transients and Migrants/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Dental Caries/epidemiology , Health Surveys , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged , Mouth Diseases/epidemiology , North Carolina , Tooth Loss
8.
J Agric Saf Health ; 12(2): 155-63, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16724791

ABSTRACT

An estimated 4.2 million seasonal and migrant farmworkers and their dependents live in the U.S. Most of these farmworkers are Latino. These workers are exposed to numerous occupational and environmental risk factors that can result in skin disease. Few data exist on the prevalence of skin disease in this population. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence and predictors of skin disease in a sample of Latino farmworkers in North Carolina. A sample of 59 farmworkers was recruited and interviewed at two camps during the 2004 agricultural season. A dermatologist completed a skin exam of each worker and recorded any skin disease present. Forty-two (77.7%) of the 54 men, and all five of the women examined had a diagnosed skin disease. For the men, onychomycosis (nail fungus, 31.5%), tinea pedis (foot fungus, 27.8%), and acne (24.1 %) were the most commonly diagnosed skin diseases, with contact dermatitis diagnosed in 5.6% of the sample. Other diagnoses included scars, sunburn, and atopic dermatitis. Among the women, diagnoses included melasma (dark patches on the face, 2 cases), xerosis (excessively dry skin, 1 case), tinea pedis (2 cases), onychomycosis (1 case), acne (1 case), and insect bites (1 case). There were no statistically significant differences between workers in the two camps despite different growing seasons and different crops harvested. Skin disease is prevalent among the North Carolina Latino farmworkers who participated in this study, with fungal disease being the most prevalent.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Hispanic or Latino , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Acne Vulgaris/epidemiology , Adult , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/ethnology , Agriculture , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/ethnology , Female , Humans , Male , North Carolina/epidemiology , Onychomycosis/epidemiology , Prevalence , Seasons , Skin Diseases/ethnology , Tinea Pedis/epidemiology
9.
J Agric Saf Health ; 9(3): 221-32, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12970952

ABSTRACT

Occupational skin disease is highly prevalent among all agricultural workers. However, few data exist on risk factors for occupational skin disease among migrant and seasonal farmworkers. The goal of this analysis was to further document the prevalence of occupational skin disease among Latino farmworkers and delineate risk factors. This exploratory analysis used data collected in repeated survey interviews with Latino farmworkers in North Carolina in June and July (early season) and in August and September (late season), 1999. Respondents were largely male (95%) and from Mexico (95%), with about one-third each age 18-24, 25-34, and 35 and older. About half were in the U.S. on work contracts. Independent variables included the physical environment (crops worked), the social environment (having received pesticide safety training, having a work contract), and behavior and individual characteristics (re-wearing work clothes, showering after work, age). The dependent measures were reporting having had itching or burning skin or a skin rash in the two months prior to each interview; 24% of the respondents in the early season, and 37% in the late season reported skin disease signs and symptoms during the previous two months. Those reporting signs and symptoms in the early season were more likely to report them in late season. Significant independent risk factors for skin signs and symptoms in early season were re-wearing work clothes, showering after work, and being age 35 or older. In late season, those who had not received pesticide safety training had lower odds of reporting skin disease signs and symptoms, after adjusting for other potential risk factors. This exploratory study indicates that Latino migrant and seasonal farmworkers experience a high incidence of occupational skin disease. Further research is required with improved measurement of skin disease signs and symptoms, diagnosis of specific skin disease, and improved measurement of risk factors.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/etiology , Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Female , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Mexico/ethnology , North Carolina/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Seasons
10.
J Agric Saf Health ; 9(1): 33-45, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12673914

ABSTRACT

Latino migrant and seasonal farmworkers, like all agricultural workers, experience high rates of occupational illness and injury. Interventions to reduce occupational injury among farmworkers must attend to the health beliefs of agricultural employers as well as employees, as employers control many aspects of the work environment. Occupational safety programs for Latino migrant and seasonal farmworkers must also be conceptually based in health behavior change and health disparities theories. We examine health beliefs of tobacco farmers about green tobacco sickness (GTS) to show the importance of delineating employer beliefs in agricultural safety. GTS is a highly prevalent occupational illness among tobacco workers that results from nicotine poisoning through dermal absorption of nicotine during cultivation and harvesting. We use qualitative methods structured by the Explanatory Models of Illness approach to identify farmer beliefs about the etiology, onset, pathophysiology, course, and treatment of GTS. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews with 15 North Carolina tobacco farmers. A computer-assisted, systematic qualitative analysis framework was applied to the interview transcripts. While tobacco farmers were generally knowledgeable about GTS, their explanatory models for this occupational illness often mis-identified its causes (heat and bending rather than nicotine) and minimized its seriousness. These models included methods of prevention that are not proven (e.g., use of anti-nausea drugs) or are more harmful than GTS (smoking cigarettes). The need for medical treatment was also discounted. Addressing each of these beliefs is important in any program to prevent GTS among farmworkers. Documenting and understanding the beliefs and knowledge of agricultural employers is an important undertaking in our efforts to reduce occupational injury and illness among farmworkers.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Nicotiana/adverse effects , Nicotine/poisoning , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Adult , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/etiology , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/prevention & control , Data Collection , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , North Carolina/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Seasons , Skin Absorption , Transients and Migrants
11.
Soc Sci Med ; 53(11): 1541-56, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11710428

ABSTRACT

Beliefs about what constitutes health promoting behaviors vary by culture and class, and knowing how an older adult interprets a specific health behavior can improve health education and medical compliance. Ethnomedical approaches have investigated how people define disease and the therapies used to return to a state of health. However, little research has addressed how individuals define health, or the behaviors they use to maintain health. We analyze the behaviors elders state are needed to stay healthy, and their meanings for these behaviors. Narratives collected through in-depth interviews with 145 male and female rural North Carolina residents aged 70 and older, including African Americans, Native Americans and European Americans are analyzed using systematic text analysis. The participants' narratives include seven salient health maintenance domains: (1) Eating Right, (2) Drinking Water, (3) "Taking" Exercise, (4) Staying Busy, (5) Being with People, (6) Trusting in God and Participating in Church, and (7) Taking Care of Yourself. Several of these domains are multi-dimensional in the meanings the elders ascribe to them. There is also overlap in the content of some of the domains; they are not discrete in the minds of the elders and a specific health behavior can reflect more than one domain. Four themes cross-cut the domains: "balance and moderation", "the holistic view of health", "social integration", and "personal responsibility". Elders in these rural communities hold a definition of health that overlaps with, but is not synonymous with a biomedical model. These elders' concept of health seamlessly integrates physical, mental, spiritual, and social aspects of health, reflecting how health is embedded in the everyday experience of these elders. Staying healthy is maintaining the ability to function in a community. These results indicate that providers cannot assume that older patients will share their interpretation of general health promotion advice.


Subject(s)
Health Behavior , Health Promotion , Black or African American , Aged , Attitude , Female , Humans , Indians, North American , Male , Models, Theoretical , North Carolina , Rural Population , White People
12.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 55(11): 818-24, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11604438

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The characteristics of some populations make epidemiological measurement extremely difficult. The objective of this study is to identify risk factors that explain variation among incidence densities and proportions of one occupational illness, green tobacco sickness, within one such special population, Latino migrant and seasonal farmworkers in the United States. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: 37 farmworker residential sites located in Granville and Wake Counties, North Carolina, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 182 migrant and seasonal farmworkers that included 178 Latino men, three Latino women, and one non-Hispanic white man. MAIN RESULTS: Green tobacco sickness had a prevalence of 0.082, and an incidence density of events per 100 days of 1.88 among the farmworkers. Prevalence and incidence density increased from early to late agricultural season. Major risk factors included lack of work experience, work activities, and working in wet clothes. Tobacco use was protective. CONCLUSION: Green tobacco sickness has a high incidence among migrant and seasonal farmworkers. Because workers have little control over most risk factors, further research is needed to identify ways to prevent this occupational illness.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Nicotine/poisoning , Nicotinic Agonists/poisoning , Adolescent , Adult , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , North Carolina/epidemiology , Poisson Distribution , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Protective Clothing , Risk Factors , Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco, Smokeless , Transients and Migrants , Weather
13.
J Occup Environ Med ; 43(10): 844-52, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11665453

ABSTRACT

We report the results of a cohort study of 182 seasonal and migrant farmworkers engaged in tobacco production in two North Carolina counties. Data were collected on tobacco work tasks and risk factors for exposure to nicotine, including smoking, every 2 weeks over a 10-week period during the summer of 1999. Saliva samples were collected for cotinine analysis at every contact. Salivary cotinine levels increased across the season, independent of smoking status. Multivariate analyses identified a model (R2 = 0.68) in which predictors of cotinine included greater age, later-season work, wet working conditions, smoking, and work task. Harvesting ("priming") tobacco was associated with higher cotinine levels than other tasks. This study demonstrates that tobacco workers experience substantial work-related exposure to nicotine. The long-term effects of such exposure should be investigated.


Subject(s)
Cotinine/analysis , Nicotine/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure , Saliva/chemistry , Adult , Agriculture , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Linear Models , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , North Carolina , Population Surveillance , Smoking/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transients and Migrants
14.
Am J Ind Med ; 40(2): 153-60, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11494343

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pesticide exposure is a major preventable occupational hazard for farmworkers. This study examined the beliefs of Latino farmworkers in North Carolina's Christmas tree industry regarding pesticide exposure. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 Mexican male seasonal farmworkers. Participants discussed beliefs about agricultural chemicals, routes of exposure, and health effects of these chemicals. They also discussed their knowledge and use of pesticide safety practices and safety training received. RESULTS: Most farmworkers knew that pesticides could be harmful, though workers varied in their levels of knowledge regarding routes of exposure, specific health effects of pesticides, and ways to avoid and reduce exposure. Workers varied considerably in the amount of safety training received and use of safety practices. Perceived lack of control and health beliefs were salient factors that decreased workers' use of safety practices. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the growing body of research which documents the health beliefs of Latino farmworkers in the U.S. relative to pesticides and pesticide safety. This literature is beginning to show convergence on several points (e.g., farmworker knowledge of acute vs. long-term illness resulting from pesticide exposure), as well as regional variation in pesticide safety beliefs. This study substantiates the need for pesticide safety education to address issues of control as well as beliefs.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Occupational Exposure , Pesticides , Safety , Adult , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Male , North Carolina , Trees
15.
South Med J ; 94(6): 603-7, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11440328

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Farmworkers face an array of environmental and workplace hazards that pose risks of eye damage from accidents involving agricultural chemicals and equipment and from exposure to wind, dust, and ultraviolet rays. Eye safety risks are known among industrial and agricultural occupations, yet little is known about the prevalence of eye symptoms and use of eye protection among farmworkers. METHODS: A survey of 197 Latino farmworkers in North Carolina used self-report data to measure workers' prevalence of eye symptoms and eye protection use. RESULTS: Eye pain and redness after working all day in the field were reported by more than 40% of workers. Most (98.4%) reported not wearing sunglasses when working in the fields; reasons included lack of sunglasses and interference with field tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Eye symptoms are prevalent in this population. Failure to use eye protection indicates the need for further education and training of Latino farmworkers and their employers about occupational risks to eyesight.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Eye Diseases/epidemiology , Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Transients and Migrants , Adult , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/etiology , Eye Diseases/drug therapy , Eyeglasses , Female , Humans , Male , North Carolina/epidemiology
16.
J Occup Environ Med ; 43(7): 601-9, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11464390

ABSTRACT

We estimated the prevalence and incidence density (ID) and the risk factors of green tobacco sickness among minority farmworkers in North Carolina. Using a prospective surveillance design, 182 farmworkers were interviewed up to 5 times at biweekly intervals in 1999. The green tobacco sickness prevalence was 24.2%, whereas the ID was 1.88 days per 100 days worked. Greater work experience (5+ years, ID = 0.87; first year ID = 2.41) and tobacco use (ID of 1.18 vs 2.39) were negatively associated with green tobacco sickness. Task (e.g., priming ID, 4.04; topping ID, 1.86; barning ID, 0.62) and working in wet clothing (25% of workdays ID, 2.97; fewer than 25% of workdays ID, 1.29) had the largest effect. More effort must be directed toward preventing this occupational illness that affects workers who have little control over workplace safety.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Nicotiana/adverse effects , Nicotine/poisoning , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/etiology , Body Mass Index , Clothing/adverse effects , Dizziness/epidemiology , Dizziness/etiology , Female , Headache/epidemiology , Headache/etiology , Humans , Incidence , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Mexican Americans/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Nausea/epidemiology , Nausea/etiology , North Carolina/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Random Allocation , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Smoking , Socioeconomic Factors , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Vomiting/epidemiology , Vomiting/etiology , Water
17.
Environ Health Perspect ; 109 Suppl 3: 429-34, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11427392

ABSTRACT

The consequences of agricultural pesticide exposure continue to be major environmental health problems in rural communities. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an important approach to redressing health disparities resulting from environmental causes. In this article we introduce a collection of articles that describe projects using CBPR to address the health disparities resulting from pesticide exposure in agricultural communities, particularly the communities of migrant and seasonal farmworkers. The articles in this collection are based on a workshop convened at the 1999 American Public Health Association meeting. The goals in presenting this collection are to provide those endeavoring to initiate CBPR projects needed information, guidelines, and procedures to improve the quality of the CBPR experience; to increase the scientific validity of CBPR projects; and to reduce the potential difficulties and stress of these collaborations. In this introduction we discuss the context in which these projects operate, summarizing background information about farmworkers in the United States, what is known about farmworker pesticide exposure, and the concept of community-based participatory research. Finally, the articles in this collection are summarized, and major themes common to successful CBPR projects are identified. These common features are taking the time to interact with the community, using multiple approaches to engage the different parts of the community, understanding different participants often have different goals, appreciating each group's strengths, valuing community knowledge, and being flexible and creative in conducting research. The final article in this collection describes the translational research program at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) highlighting activities pertinent to the health of rural communities, giving an overview of NIEHS-supported projects addressing health concerns of Native Americans and rural African-American communities in addition to farmworkers, and discussing future plans for CBPR at NIEHS.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Emigration and Immigration , Minority Groups , Occupational Exposure , Pesticides/adverse effects , Community-Institutional Relations , Data Collection , Humans , Indians, North American , Public Health , Research Design , Social Class
18.
Environ Health Perspect ; 109 Suppl 3: 435-41, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11427393

ABSTRACT

Partnerships between academic researchers and community organizations are frequently formed to address environmental health concerns in underserved communities. Although such participatory approaches to research combine valuable assets of both partners, they are often difficult to maintain. We describe a partnership formed to investigate migrant and seasonal farmworker exposure to pesticides in North Carolina and to develop effective interventions to reduce exposure. North Carolina ranks fifth in the United States in the number of farmworkers; most are from Mexico, and a significant minority come to the United States on work contracts. Several barriers to establishing effective collaboration were recognized in this partnership, including stereotypes, cultural differences, competing demands for time and attention, and differences in orientation to power structures. To overcome these barriers, members of the partnership took actions in three domains: clarifying the different goals of each partner, operationalizing a model of participation that could involve many different community segments developing cultural sensitivity. By taking these actions, the work of the partnership was accomplished in ways that met the criteria for success of both academic researchers and community members. This approach can be used by others to develop collaborative relationships to investigate environmental health issues within a community-based participatory framework.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Community-Institutional Relations , Emigration and Immigration , Occupational Exposure , Pesticides/adverse effects , Public Policy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Medically Underserved Area , Middle Aged , Minority Groups , North Carolina , Policy Making
19.
Soc Sci Med ; 52(12): 1763-75, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11352404

ABSTRACT

Chronic disease is a significant and costly social problem. The burden is even more pronounced in communities with high rates of a particular chronic disease. Assessment of health belief systems and the local geographies of health beliefs can assist community health planners to create cost-effective strategic intervention programs where populations are at high risk for chronic diseases. In this paper, we elaborate the concept of socio-spatial knowledge networks (SSKNs) and demonstrate that SSKNs can be useful in informing the design of health care prevention strategies. In our project, we demonstrate how to identify key socio-spatial information for intervention strategies which will prevent or delay the onset of a particular chronic disease, Type 2 diabetes. Our qualitative framework allows us to determine which sites might be best characterized as socio-spatial knowledge network nodes for sharing diabetes information and which sites might be less suited to such exchange. Our strategy explores cross-cultural similarities, differences, and overlap in a multi-ethnic rural North Carolina context through simple techniques such as mapping social networks and sites in which people share their knowledge and beliefs about diabetes. This geographical analysis allows us to examine exactly where health knowledge coincides with other social support, and where such resources may be improved in a particular community. Knowing precisely what people in a community understand about a chronic disease and its treatment or prevention and knowing where people go to share that information helps to (1) identify strategic locations within a community for future interventions and, (2) evaluate the effectiveness of existing interventions. The geographical approach presented here is one that can serve other communities and health practitioners who hope to improve chronic disease management in diverse local environments.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Community Health Planning/methods , Community Networks , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Information Services , Aged , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , North Carolina/epidemiology , Rural Population , Social Support , Topography, Medical/methods
20.
Am J Ind Med ; 39(5): 487-98, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11333410

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Migrant and seasonal farmworkers are at risk for occupational illnesses from pesticide exposure, and the effectiveness of pesticide safety regulations has not been evaluated. It is important to learn from farmworker safety experiences to develop effective measures to improve agricultural workplace safety. METHODS: Formative research included in-depth interviews with farmworkers, farmers, extension agents, and health care providers. Survey research included interviews with 270 minority farmworkers during 1998, and 293 during 1999. RESULTS: Farmworkers and farmers hold different beliefs concerning pesticide safety which affect sanitation practices. Farmworkers report in survey data that farmers do not adhere to regulations mandating training and basic sanitation facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Several points of intervention are available to improve pesticide safety and sanitation. Additional regulation by itself is not an advantageous starting point. The emphasis for intervention must include educating farmers as well as farmworkers.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Occupational Health , Pesticides , Rural Health , Sanitation , Humans , North Carolina , Workplace
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...