Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Fish Dis ; 34(1): 65-70, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21118271

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine the differences in disease resistance against artificial infection with Aeromonas hydrophila between genetically different common carp families. Four strains differing in their origin and breeding history were selected from the live gene bank of common carp maintained at the Research Institute for Fisheries, Aquaculture and Irrigation (HAKI, Szarvas, Hungary) to establish families with wide genetic background: Szarvas 15 (15), an inbred mirror line; Tata (T) scaly noble carp; Duna (D), a Hungarian wild carp and Amur (A), an East Asian wild carp. A diallele mating structure was used to allow the assessment of genetic variation within and between the tested 96 families for a variety of traits. The existing technologies of fertilization and incubation of carp eggs, as well as larval and fingerling rearing had been modified because of the large number of baseline populations. Two challenge trials of the 96 families of carp with Aeromonas hydrophila were done. The 10 most resistant and 10 most susceptible families to A. hydrophila were identified from these two challenges. The crosses that produced the most resistant families were mainly those having parents from Tata and Szarvas 15 domesticated strains, while the most susceptible families were from the wild strains Duna and Amur.


Subject(s)
Aeromonas hydrophila/immunology , Carps/genetics , Carps/immunology , Fish Diseases/immunology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Animals , Carps/growth & development , Crosses, Genetic , Female , Fish Diseases/genetics , Fish Diseases/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/genetics , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/immunology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Immunity, Innate , Male , Species Specificity
2.
Fish Physiol Biochem ; 35(4): 669-76, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19277888

ABSTRACT

The use of immunostimulants as an alternative to the drugs, chemicals and antibiotics currently being used to control fish diseases in fish culture is attracting the attention of many researchers. In this context, many have focused on the use of medicinal plant products as potential therapeutic measures for modulating the immune response and, specifically, on the use of herbs to prevent and control fish diseases. Medicinal plants (plant remedies) are a deeply rooted component of the cultural heritage of many people from diverse cultures and countries and are, as such, closely linked to the maintenance of good health. The aim of this paper is to review research currently being carried out on the herbs and herbal extracts that have been shown to modulate the immune system of fish. Special attention is given to the use of Chinese and Indian herbs.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Aquaculture/methods , Fish Diseases/immunology , Fish Diseases/prevention & control , Animals , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use
3.
Fish Shellfish Immunol ; 26(1): 140-5, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18817878

ABSTRACT

The effect of Chinese herbs (Astragalus radix and Ganoderma lucidum) on immune response of carp was investigated. Fish were fed diets containing Astragalus (0.5%), Ganoderma (0.5%) and combination of two herbs (Astragalus 0.5% and Ganoderma 0.5%) for 5 weeks. Other groups of fish were vaccinated (i.p.) against Aeromonas hydrophila/Aeromonas salmonicida (Shering Plough, Essex, U.K.) at the beginning of the experiment and fed the same diets as described above. Control fish (negative control) and fish vaccinated only (positive control) were fed basal diets without supplements of herbs. The respiratory burst activity, phagocytosis, lysozyme activity and circulatory antibody titres in plasma were monitored. Following 5 weeks after feeding, fish were infected with A. hydrophila and mortalities were recorded. The results of this study showed that feeding non-vaccinated and vaccinated carp with combination of Astragalus and Ganoderma stimulated respiratory burst activity, phagocytosis of phagocytic cells in blood and lysozyme and circulatory antibody titres in plasma in vaccinated carp. Fish challenged with A. hydrophila had variable survival. The best survival (60%) was in vaccinated group fed with both herbs, while almost 90% of control fish (negative control) and 60% of fish vaccinated only (positive control) died.


Subject(s)
Astragalus Plant/immunology , Carps/immunology , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/pharmacology , Fish Diseases/immunology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/immunology , Immunity, Mucosal/drug effects , Reishi/immunology , Adjuvants, Immunologic/pharmacology , Aeromonas hydrophila/immunology , Animals , Fish Diseases/mortality , Fish Diseases/prevention & control , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/mortality , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Phagocytosis/drug effects , Respiratory Burst/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...