Non-Operative Approach to Contained Perforated Marginal Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Perforated marginal ulcers (PMUs) are a rare but known complication of bariatric surgery. Management typically involves prompt surgical intervention, but limited data exists on non-operative approaches. This study reviews published data on non-operative management of PMUs and presents a case series of patients who were managed non-operatively. Our hypothesis is that certain patients with signs of perforation can be successfully managed non-operatively with close observation. METHODS: We completed a systematic review searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov. Ultimately 3 studies described the presentation and non-operative management of 5 patients. Additionally, we prospectively collected data from our institution on all patients who presented between Dec. 2022 and Dec. 2023 with PMUs confirmed on imaging and managed non-operatively. RESULTS: In our literature review, three patients had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), while two had one anastomosis gastric bypass. One patient required surgery two days after admission. Another underwent elective conversion surgery weeks later for a non-healing ulcer. Two received endoscopic interventions. One patient recovered with nil-per-os (NPO) status, and intravenous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. The patients in our case series presented with normal vital signs, an average of 30 months after RYGB, and with CT scan signs of perforation. None of these patients required surgical or endoscopic intervention. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, while perforated marginal ulcers have traditionally been considered a surgical emergency, some patients can be successfully treated with non-operative management. More research is needed to identify the clinical presentation features, comorbidities, and imaging findings of this group.

Use of lumen-apposing metal stents in treating gastrojejunal anastomotic strictures in bariatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Gastrojejunal strictures (GJS) are rare but significant adverse events following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, with limited options for effective non-operative interventions. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) represent a new therapy for treatment of intestinal strictures, but the effectiveness in treating GJS is unknown. This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of LAMS in GJS. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational study of patients with prior Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass who underwent LAMS placement for GJS. The primary outcome of interest is resolution of GJS following LAMS removal defined by toleration of bariatric diet after LAMS removal. Secondary outcomes include need for additional procedures, LAMS-related adverse events, and need for revisional surgery. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled. The cohort was 85% female with median age of 43. 65% had marginal ulcers associated with the GJS. Presenting symptoms included nausea and vomiting (50% of patients), dysphagia (50%), epigastric pain (20%), and failure to thrive (10%). Diameter of LAMS placed were 15 mm in 15 patients, 20 mm in 3 patients, and 10 mm in 2 patients. LAMS were placed for a median of 58 days (IQR 56-70). Twelve patients (60%) achieved resolution of GJS after LAMS removal. Of the eight patients without GJS resolution or with recurrence, seven (35%) required repeat placement of LAMS. One patient was lost to follow up. One perforation and two migrations occurred. Four patients required revisional surgery after LAMS removal. CONCLUSION: LAMS placement is well-tolerated and effective with most patients achieving short-term symptom resolution and with few reported complications. While stricture resolution occurred in over half the patients, nearly 1/4th of patients required revisional surgery. More data is needed to predict who would benefit from LAMS versus surgical intervention.

Bone mineral density changes after bariatric surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Although bariatric surgery is associated with multiple health benefits, decreased bone mass is a known complication of the procedure. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is associated with significant bone loss and increased fracture risk. However, data on the effect of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on bone mineral changes are sparse. The impact of vitamin D and calcium levels on bone mineral density (BMD) after SG is also unknown. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to include patients who underwent RYGB or SG from 2014 to 2016 at a single institution. Patients were included if bone densitometry was performed preoperatively and within 2 years postoperatively. Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D and calcium levels were collected preoperatively and at time of bone densitometry scan. BMD and T-score changes at the femoral neck, femoral trochanter, total hip, and lumbar spine were compared between RYGB and SG patients. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included. 24 (60%) of patients underwent RYGB and 16 (40%) patients underwent SG. No statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics was noted between RYGB and SG patients. All measurements, except for serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D, were significantly decreased in RYGB patients, postoperatively. All measurements, except for BMD and T-score at the lumbar spine and serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D, were significantly decreased in SG patients, postoperatively. The extent of decrease in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D was significantly associated with decreased BMD (p = 0.049) and T-score (p = 0.032) at the lumbar spine. The extent of decrease in serum calcium was significantly associated with decreased BMD (p = 0.046) at the femoral neck. CONCLUSION: All patients were found to have decreased BMD after RYGB and SG. Surgery type was not a significant risk factor in BMD change. Despite vitamin D and calcium supplementation in all patients, a decrease in vitamin D and calcium levels were associated with a decrease in BMD. Close follow-up and treatment of vitamin D and calcium levels are warranted in all bariatric patients.

The Impact of Telemedicine Adoption on a Multidisciplinary Bariatric Surgery Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to show how full-time telemedicine adoption has impacted patient visit volume and attendance in a comprehensive metabolic and weight loss center. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Elective surgical practices have been profoundly impacted by the global COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a rapid increase in the utilization of telemedicine. The abrupt initiation of audio-video telehealth visits for all providers of a multidisciplinary clinic on March 19 2020 provided unique circumstances to assess the impact of telemedicine. METHODS: Data from the clinical booking system (new patient and follow-up visits) for all clinical provider types of the multidisciplinary metabolic center from the pre-telehealth, post-telehealth, and a 2019 comparative period were retrospectively reviewed and compared. The primary outcome is the change in patient visit volume for all clinical providers from before to after the initiation of telemedicine for both new patient, and follow-up visits. RESULTS: There were a total of 506 visits (162 new patient visits, and 344 follow-ups) in the pre-telehealth period, versus 413 visits (77 new patient visits, and 336 follow-ups) during the post-telehealth period. After telehealth implementation, new visits for surgeons decreased by 75%. Although follow-up visits decreased by 55.06% for surgeons, there was an increase by 27.36% for advanced practitioners. When surgeons were separated from other practitioners, their follow-up visit rate decrease by 55.06%, compared to a 16.08% increase for the group of all other practitioners (P < 0.0001). Dietitians experienced higher rates of absenteeism with new patient visits (10.00% vs 31.42%, P = 0.0128), whereas bariatricians experienced a decrease in follow-up visit absenteeism (33.33% vs 0%, P = 0.0093). CONCLUSIONS: Although new patient visit volume fell across the board, follow-up visits increased for certain nonsurgical providers. This provides a template for adoption of a multidisciplinary telehealth clinic in a post-pandemic world.

A Nationwide Safety Analysis of Discharge on the First Postoperative Day After Bariatric Surgery in Selected Patients.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery has led to early recovery and shorter hospital stay after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). This study aims to assess feasibility and outcomes of postoperative day (POD) 1 discharge after LRYGB and LSG from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) 2015 dataset. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective LRYGB and LSG and were discharged on POD 1 and 2 were extracted from the MBSAQIP dataset. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between cases with POD 1 vs POD 2 discharge, and the 30-day outcomes of the cohorts were compared. RESULTS: A total of 80,464 patients met the study criteria: 8862 LRYGB and 31,370 LSG cases, which were discharged on POD 1, and matched 1:1 with those discharged on POD 2. Within the LRYGB cohort, patients discharged on POD 2 had higher all-cause morbidity (7.5% vs 6.1%; p < 0.001) and 30-day re-intervention (2.0% vs 1.5%; p = 0.004) in comparison with patients discharged on POD 1. There were no statistical differences with respect to serious morbidity (0.5% vs 0.4%; p = 0.15), 30-day readmission (4.9% vs 4.5%; p = 0.2), and 30-day reoperation (1.3% vs 1.2%; p = 0.7). Within the LSG cohort, patients discharged on POD 2 had higher all-cause morbidity (4.2% vs 3.4%; p < 0.001), serious morbidity (0.4% vs 0.3%; p < 0.001), 30-day re-intervention (1.0% vs 0.6%; p < 0.001), and 30-day readmission (2.9% vs 2.5%; p = 0.002) in comparison with patients discharged on POD 1. CONCLUSIONS: Early discharge on POD 1 may be safe in a selective group of bariatric patients without significant comorbidities.

Bariatric surgery in patients with interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative pulmonary complications are frequent in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Limited literature exists regarding the safety of bariatric procedures in patients with ILD. This study aims to assess the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of patients with ILD who underwent bariatric surgery at our institution. METHODS: After IRB approval, all patients with preoperative diagnosis of ILD who had bariatric surgery at an academic center between 2004 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients with ILD underwent bariatric surgery: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 17, 68%), sleeve gastrectomy (n = 7, 28%), and adjustable gastric banding (n = 1, 4%). Twenty-one patients (84%) were females. The median age and preoperative body mass index (BMI) were 53 (IQR 42-58) years and 39 (IQR 37-44) kg/m2, respectively. The median operative time and length of stay was 137 (IQR 110-187) min and 3 (IQR 2-5) days, respectively. The 30-day complications were reported in four patients (16%) but there was no pulmonary complication or unplanned admission to the intensive care unit. At 1-year follow-up (85%), the median BMI and excess weight loss were 30 (IQR 25-36) kg/m2 and 67% (IQR 45-100), respectively. Compared to preoperative values, there was significant improvement in the pulmonary function test (PFT) variables at 1 year with respect to forced vital capacity (62% vs 74%; n = 13, p = 0.003), and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (53% vs 66%; n = 10, p = 0.003). Six out of the seven potential lung transplant candidates became eligible for transplantation after weight loss, and one of them had successful lung transplant at 88 months after bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION: In our experience, bariatric patients with ILD achieved significant weight loss and improvement in PFT. Bariatric surgery in these higher risk ILD patients appears relatively safe with acceptable perioperative morbidity and improved candidacy for lung transplantation.

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is safe and feasible in the early postoperative period after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons may be reluctant to perform upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy in the early post-operative period due to concern for anastomotic disruption. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of early (≤ 30 days) post-operative UGI endoscopy after roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB). METHODS: A retrospective data analysis of a prospectively maintained database was completed between May 2002 and March 2015 for patients that had undergone UGI endoscopy within 30 days of their RYGB. Data analysis included baseline patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, perioperative parameters, indications for endoscopy; indications for any further endoscopic evaluation, interventions performed, and post-endoscopy complications. RESULTS: 190 patients underwent early postoperative UGI endoscopy after RYGB during the study period. Nineteen patients (10 %) had undergone revisional surgeries. The median duration to postoperative endoscopy was 22 days [IQR 16-26]. The most common indications included dysphagia (n = 74, 39%), abdominal pain (n = 53, 28%), nausea (n = 55, 29%), and vomiting (n = 47, 25%). Therapeutic interventions were performed in 79 patients (42%). These included balloon dilation (n = 66, 84%), feeding tube placement (n = 7, 9%), evacuation of clot (n = 2, 3%), epinephrine injection (n = 2, 3%) and coagulation of bleeding (n = 1, 1%). There were no post-UGI endoscopy anastomotic disruptions or leaks. CONCLUSION: Endoscopy is helpful for the diagnosis and management of complications after RYGB. Despite the perceived risks, our study demonstrated no complications for both diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy when performed in the early postoperative period.

Incidence and clinical implications of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis after laparoscopic bariatric procedures.

Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) represents less than 10 % of thromboembolic events, but has been associated with higher incidence of asymptomatic pulmonary embolism. Data regarding UEDVT and its treatment is limited. Our objective was to investigate UEDVT incidence, diagnosis, and treatment in our bariatric patient population. We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery at our institution. Variables analyzed included patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), history of venous thromboembolic event (VTE), type of procedure, and other comorbidities. One thousand five hundred three patients were included in the study. Twenty patients developed VTE events, of which five suffered UEDVT. Although infrequent, awareness of UEDVT is necessary in order to initiate treatment in a timely fashion and to prevent major complications.