Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
2.
Melanoma Res ; 33(4): 316-325, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37199712

ABSTRACT

Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) has historically been associated with short survival and limited effective treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been trialed in mUM; however, robust conclusions regarding their efficacy are difficult to draw given small study sizes and heterogeneous patient populations. Five databases were searched using a combination of 'ICI' and 'mUM' headings, and data on patient demographics, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted. Pooled ORR was calculated using a random effects model and the inverse variance method. Available Kaplan-Meier OS and PFS curves were used to construct summary OS and PFS plots, from which median values were derived. Pooled ORR was 9.2% overall (95% CI 7.2-11.8) [4.1% for anti-CTLA4 (95% CI 2.1-7.7), 7.1% for anti-PD(L)1 (95% CI 4.5-10.9) and 13.5% for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (95% CI 10.0-18.0)]. Median OS was 11.5 months overall (95% CI 9.5-13.8) [8.0 months for anti-CTLA4 (95% CI 5.5-9.9), 11.7 months for anti-PD(L)1 (95% CI 9.0-14.0) and 16.0 months for ipilimumab plus anti-PD1 (95% CI 11.5-17.7) ( P < 0.001)]. Median PFS was 3.0 months overall (95% CI 2.9-3.1). ICIs have limited efficacy in mUM and a recommendation for their use must consider the balance of benefit and risk for individual patients if no other options are available. Further biomarker profiling studies may be helpful in assessing which patients will benefit from ICIs, in particular the addition of ipilimumab to anti-PD1 therapy.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/pathology , Ipilimumab/pharmacology , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use
4.
PLoS One ; 17(5): e0268477, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35560035

ABSTRACT

Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) require specialized activities to leverage genomic data for therapeutic decision-making. Currently, there are no defined standards for implementing, executing, and tracking the impact of MTBs. This study describes the development and validation of ACTE-MTB, a tool to evaluate the maturity of an organization's MTB to identify specific areas that would benefit from process improvements and standardization. The ACTE-MTB maturity assessment tool is composed of 3 elements: 1) The ACTE-MTB maturity model; 2) a 59-question survey on MTB processes and challenges; and 3) a 5-level MTB maturity scoring algorithm. This tool was developed to measure MTB maturity in the categories of Access, Consultation, Technology, and Evidence (ACTE) and was tested on 20 MTBs spanning the United States, Europe, and Asia-Pacific regions. Validity testing revealed that the average maturity score was 3.3 out of 5 (+/- 0.1; range 2.0-4.3) with MTBs in academic institutions showing significantly higher overall maturity levels than in non-academic institutions (3.7 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.2; P = .018). While maturity scores for academic institutions were higher for Consultation, Technology, and Evidence domains, the maturity score for the Access domain did not significantly differ between the two groups, highlighting a disconnect between MTB operations and the downstream impact on ability to access testing and/or therapies. To our knowledge, ACTE-MTB is the first tool of its kind to enable structured, maturity assessment of MTBs in a universally-applicable manner. In the process of establishing construct validity of this tool, opportunities for further investigation and improvements were identified that address the key functional areas of MTBs that would likely benefit from standardization and best practice recommendations. We believe a unified approach to assessment of MTB maturity will help to identify areas for improvement at both the organizational and system level.


Subject(s)
Genomics , Neoplasms , Asia , Europe , Humans , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/therapy , United States
5.
Immunotherapy ; 14(7): 511-520, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35321560

ABSTRACT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been incorporated into the treatment of various malignancies. An increasing body of literature is reporting rare but potentially fatal adverse events associated with these agents. In this case series, the authors report the clinical features and outcomes of seven patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors for different solid organ malignancies and developed a tetrad of immune-related myocarditis, myositis, myasthenia gravis and transaminitis. Herein the authors review the literature and describe the current diagnostic and management approach for this overlapping syndrome. The authors' series highlights the importance of a high index of clinical suspicion, prompt comprehensive investigations, early multidisciplinary team involvement and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy when immune-related adverse events are suspected.


Cancer immunotherapy is used in the treatment of different cancer types. Immunotherapy activates the immune system to detect and attack cancer cells, but side effects may arise from the immune system inadvertently attacking normal tissues and organs. The increased use of immunotherapy has led to an increase in the reporting of rare but potentially life-threatening treatment-related side effects. In this case series, the authors report the clinical features and outcomes of seven patients who developed inflammation of the heart, muscles, nerve and muscle junctions and liver following treatment with immunotherapy. The authors review the scientific literature and discuss the current understanding of and management approach to this rare syndrome. The authors' report highlights the importance of a high degree of clinical suspicion, prompt comprehensive testing to confirm diagnosis, early involvement of experts from different specialties and early initiation of treatment in the management of this unique syndrome.


Subject(s)
Myasthenia Gravis , Myocarditis , Myositis , Neoplasms , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Myasthenia Gravis/chemically induced , Myocarditis/chemically induced , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Myocarditis/drug therapy , Myositis/chemically induced , Myositis/diagnosis , Neoplasms/drug therapy
6.
Front Oncol ; 11: 701424, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34249762

ABSTRACT

Taxane-based chemotherapy regimens are in widespread use as standard of care treatment for patients with early breast cancer, though rarely its use can be complicated by taxane-induced pneumonitis (TIP). While breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in women worldwide, TIP remains under-described in this setting. Key questions relate to its incidence, diagnosis and management, potential predictive biomarkers, and the balance between this life-threatening toxicity and curatively intended treatment. At a single Australian institution, 6 cases of TIP are identified among 132 patients treated with a paclitaxel-containing regimen for early breast cancer (4.55%, 95% confidence interval 1.69-9.63%). This review first outlines the presentation, management, and outcomes for these cases, then answers these questions and proposes an approach to suspected TIP in patients with breast cancer.

7.
Respirol Case Rep ; 8(6): e00610, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32595975

ABSTRACT

Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome is a rare, autosomal dominant disorder caused by a germline mutation in the folliculin gene (17p11.2). It is characterized by benign skin lesions, renal tumours, and pulmonary cysts, with pneumothoraces seen exceptionally rarely in patients younger than 40 years. We report the case of a 15-year-old boy who presented with sudden onset left-sided chest pain and acute dyspnoea secondary to a large left-sided pneumothorax. This failed to resolve despite chest drain insertion and he required video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical pleurodesis, which revealed macroscopic pulmonary cyst formation. Following this, he made a good recovery and a further high-resolution computerized tomography (CT) scan of his chest identified multiple, small, subpleural parenchymal lung cysts that were not initially visible on prior imaging. Further questioning revealed a strong family history of spontaneous pneumothoraces and additional genomic sequencing, and confirmed a diagnosis of BHD syndrome. We highlight the diagnostic, management, and surveillance challenges for this rare syndrome.

8.
Horm Cancer ; 11(3-4): 155-169, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32303972

ABSTRACT

Advanced adrenocortical cancer (ACC) is a rare, highly aggressive malignancy, which typically has a poor prognosis. In advanced ACC, the overall trend is toward a short PFS interval following first-line systemic therapy, highlighting a clear need for improved second-/third-line treatment strategies. We conducted a review of the literature and relevant scientific guidelines related to systemic therapy for advanced ACC. Public indexes including PubMed/MEDLINE were searched. Treatment selection in the second-line setting is based on small phase 2 trials, case reports, and pre-clinical evidence. The best data available for initial second-line therapy selection supports the use of gemcitabine and capecitabine (G + C) or streptozotocin (S), both with or without mitotane. G + C is becoming increasingly recommended based on phase 2 clinical trial data in patients of good PS, due to the inferred superior PFS and OS from non-comparative trials. Alternatively, streptozotocin was better tolerated than EDP + M in the FIRM-ACT study and remains an option when warranted. Beyond this, further treatment approaches should be tailored to individual patient characteristics, utilizing a mixture of systemic therapies, local therapies, and enrolment in clinical trials where available. Additionally, the role of molecular stratification, predictive biomarkers, and immune checkpoint inhibitors in specific individuals, such as Lynch syndrome, is evolving and may become increasingly utilized in clinical practice. Advanced ACC necessitates a multidisciplinary approach and is best managed in a specialist center. Although there is no one definitive second-line treatment strategy, there are some favorable approaches, which require further validation in larger clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Adrenocortical Carcinoma/drug therapy , Humans
9.
Aust Prescr ; 42(2): 62-67, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31048940
10.
Eur J Cancer ; 104: 137-144, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30347289

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy is now routinely used to treat several cancers. Clinical trials have excluded several populations, including patients with solid organ transplant, HIV infection and hepatitis B/C infection. We examined the safety outcomes of these populations treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment in a multicentre retrospective study. METHODS: Patients from 16 centres with advanced cancer and solid organ transplant, HIV infection or hepatitis B/C infection were included. Demographic, tumour, treatment, toxicity and outcome data were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included for analysis, with a median age of 60 years, and the majority of patients diagnosed with melanoma (72%). Among six patients with solid organ transplants, two graft rejections occurred, with one resulting in death, whereas two patients achieved partial responses. There were four responses in 12 patients with HIV infection. In 14 patients with hepatitis B, there were three responses, and similarly, there were three responses in 14 patients with hepatitis C. There was no unexpected toxicity in any viral infection group or an increase in viral load. CONCLUSION: Patients with HIV or hepatitis B/C infections treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy may respond to treatment without increased toxicity. Given the risk of graft rejection in solid organ transplant patients and also the potential for response, the role of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy needs to be carefully considered.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , HIV Infections/complications , Hepatitis B, Chronic/complications , Hepatitis C, Chronic/complications , Immunotherapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Neoplasm Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Transplant Recipients , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Female , Graft Rejection/etiology , Humans , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Male , Melanoma/complications , Melanoma/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Molecular Targeted Therapy/adverse effects , Neoplasms/complications , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
11.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 16(2): 130-134, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29331381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The CHAARTED (ChemoHormonal Therapy Versus Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease in Prostate Cancer) and STAMPEDE (Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy) trials showed that the addition of docetaxel (D) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prolonged longevity of men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the impact of upfront D on subsequent therapies is still unexplored. As abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide (E) are the most commonly used first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), we aimed to assess whether they maintained their efficacy after ADT+D versus ADT alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of patients with mCRPC treated between 2014 and 2017 with first-line AA or E for mCRPC was identified from 3 hospitals' institutional review board-approved databases. Patients were classified by use of D for mHSPC. This time frame was chosen as ADT+D became a valid therapeutic option for mHSPC in 2014, and it inherently entailed a short follow-up time on AA/E. The endpoints included overall survival from ADT start, overall survival from AA/E start, and time to AA/E start from ADT start. Differences between groups were assessed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Of the 102 patients with mCRPC identified, 50 (49%) had previously received ADT alone, while 52 (51%) had ADT+D. No statistically significant difference in any of the evaluated outcomes was observed between the 2 cohorts. Yet, deaths in the ADT+D group were 12 versus 21 in the ADT alone, after a median follow-up of 24.4 and 29.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of ADT/ADT+D-treated patients with mCRPC with short times to first-line AA/E and follow-up, the efficacy of AA/E is similar regardless of previous use of D.


Subject(s)
Abiraterone Acetate/administration & dosage , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Abiraterone Acetate/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Benzamides , Disease-Free Survival , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Nitriles , Phenylthiohydantoin/administration & dosage , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...