Opportunities for change and levelling up: a trust wide retrospective analysis of 8 years of laparoscopic and abdominal myomectomy.

Background: Laparoscopic myomectomy is increasingly considered the gold standard uterine preserving procedure and has well documented benefits over the open approach. Barriers that women have in accessing the most appropriate treatment need to be addressed to ensure optimal patient care and outcomes. Objectives: To analyse rates of open and laparoscopic myomectomy at a large NHS trust and identify how many cases could potentially have been performed laparoscopically, and any variation between sites. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of preoperative imaging reports and a surgical database containing information for all myomectomies performed between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2022. Main outcome measures: Number of procedures suitable for alternative surgical approach; length of hospital stay; estimated blood loss; cost differences. Results: 846 myomectomies were performed; 656 by laparotomy and 190 by laparoscopy. 194/591 (32.8%) open myomectomies could have been performed laparoscopically and 26/172 (15.1%) laparoscopic myomectomies may have been better performed via an open approach. Length of hospital stay, and estimated blood loss were significantly higher in the open group. Had cases been performed as indicated by pre-operative imaging, the cost differences ranged from -£115,752 to £251,832. Conclusions: There is disparity in access to the gold standard care of laparoscopic myomectomy. Due to multifactorial reasons, even at sites where the rate of laparoscopic myomectomy is high, there is still underutilisation of this approach. It is clear that there is scope for change and "levelling up" of this imbalance. What is new?: Robust pathways and guidelines must be developed, and more laparoscopic surgeons should be trained to optimise care for women with fibroids.

Google searches and medical publication trends since the 2014 US Food and Drug Administration position on power morcellation: Do these translate into patient awareness?

OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to assess patient awareness by observing Google Trends comparing search terms used in relation to morcellation rather than morcellation alone. Our secondary objective was to review trends and locations of publications on leiomyosarcoma and morcellation following the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) position statement. STUDY DESIGN: To assess Internet trends, we obtained the relative search volume (RSV) for each month from 1 January 2004 to 1 March 2019 from Google Trends using the terms 'fibroid', 'morcellation', and 'fibroid cancer'. RSV ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being peak popularity for the term, and all other monthly search activity relative to the peak. To assess academic trends, we performed a systematic review of published literature discussing fibroid morcellation within the same time period. We used a two-way independent t-test to compare median RSV, and chi-squared test to compare academic output. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Search volume for 'morcellation' peaked during the FDA statement (RSV 0.5 to 2.9, t = 17.5, p < 0.05) but was not sustained. There is an increase in 'fibroid' activity post-FDA statement (RSV 68.8 to 76.3, t = 3.9, p < 0.05). 'Fibroid cancer' remained static throughout (t = 1.5, p = 0.1 and t=-0.5, p = 0.6). Afro-Caribbean countries had the highest RSV for 'fibroid', whereas 'morcellation' RSV was highest in predominantly Western countries. There was a significant increase in the rate of papers published on the subject following the FDA statement (6.8 vs 55.6 papers per year, 95% CI -53.96 to -43.64, p < 0.0001). No academic papers on morcellation were published from countries with the highest RSV for 'fibroid'. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that interest in uterine fibroids has increased since the FDA statement, but the public are perhaps unaware or not concerned of the consequent potential risk of leiomyosarcoma following morcellation. Countries where fibroid interest is highest are not necessarily those that can offer power morcellation. Further studies are required to address how the Internet influences patient choice and informed consent, and how medical professionals can use it to further educate patients on the risks and benefits of laparoscopic myomectomy and power morcellation.

Stem cell therapy for stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review in human subjects.

PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the current evidence on the safety and efficacy of stem cell therapy (SCT) in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) to allow objective comparison with existing surgical techniques. METHODS: Systematic literature search of Medline from years 1946-2012 using terms: "stem", "cell", "stress", "urinary", and "incontinence". Included studies presented empirical data on the treatment of SUI using SCT. OUTCOMES: adverse events, incontinence, quality of life, urodynamic, transurethral ultrasound and urethral EMG findings. RESULTS: Eight studies met inclusion criteria (seven observational and one randomized). Quality score: median 10.75 of 20 (range 2-12.5). Adverse events: one patient had bladder perforation and two procedures could not be completed due to pain. Temporary urinary retention and cystitis were also reported. Incontinence score: Four studies describe significant improvement. Quality of life: significant improvement in four studies. Urodynamic outcomes: four studies show significant improvement in contractility of urethral sphincter; three studies demonstrate no change in bladder capacity and significant reduction in residual volume; significant improvement in urinary flow three studies, although two found no difference; increase in leak point pressure and detrusor pressure in three studies. Urethral ultrasound: three studies found significant increases in rhabdosphincter thickness and contractility. Urethral EMG: two studies found significant increases in the EMG at rest and at contraction. CONCLUSION: Data suggest that SC treatment for SUI is safe and effective in the short term. However, the quality and maturity of the data are limited. Robust data from better quality studies comparing this to current surgical techniques are needed.

Risperidone for autism spectrum disorder.

BACKGROUND: Autistic spectrum disorder encompasses a wide variety of behavioural and communicative problems. Both the core features and non-core features of autism have been targeted in a variety of therapies. Atypical antipsychotic medications, including risperidone, have been used for symptom and behaviour improvement and have shown beneficial outcomes, particularly in certain aspects of the disorder. However, given the nature of the condition presenting in young patients, the risks of these potentially long term therapies must be weighed against the benefits. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of risperidone for people with autism spectrum disorder. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic databases: CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) 2006 (Issue 3); MEDLINE (1966 to April 2006); EMBASE (1980 to April 2006);PsycINFO (1887 to April 2006); CINAHL (1982 to April 2006); LILACS (1982 to April 2006 ); Clinicaltrials.gov (USA) (accessed April 2006); ZETOC (1993 to April 2006); National Research Register (NRR) (UK) 2006 (Issue 1) were searched. In addition further data were retrieved through contact with pharmaceutical companies and authors of published trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials of risperidone versus placebo for patients with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. All trials had to have at least one standardised outcome measure used for both intervention and control group. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were independently evaluated and analysed by the reviewers. Data were evaluated at the end of each randomised controlled trial. Unpublished data were also considered and analysed. MAIN RESULTS: Only three randomised controlled trials were identified. Meta-analysis was possible for three outcomes. Some evidence of the benefits of risperidone in irritability, repetition and social withdrawal were apparent. These must however be considered against the adverse effects, the most prominent being weight gain. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone can be beneficial in some features of autism. However there are limited data available from studies with small sample sizes. In addition, there lacks a single standardised outcome measure allowing adequate comparison of studies, and long-term followup is also lacking. Further research is necessary to determine the efficacy pf risperidone in clinical practice.