Potential for managing pool levels in a flood-control reservoir to increase nitrate-nitrogen load reductions.

Few strategies are available to reduce nitrate-nitrogen (NO3 -N) loads at larger landscape scales, but flood control reservoirs are known to reduce riverine loads. In this study, we evaluated the potential to increase nitrogen (N) loss at Lake Red Rock, a large reservoir located in central Iowa, by evaluating the inundation of sediments deposited at the reservoir inflow. Sediment samples were collected at 51 locations in the lower delta region and analyzed for particle size and nutrient content. Nitrogen loss rates in delta sediments were determined from laboratory assays, and satellite imagery was used to develop a rating curve to quantify land area inundated within the delta. The daily mass of NO3 -N reduced with delta inundation was estimated by applying the mean N 24-h loss rate (0.66 g N m2 day-1 ) by the area of inundation (m2 ). Results indicated that raising pool elevations to inundate more of the delta would result in greater N losses, ranging from 2 to 377 Mg per year. Potential N loss of 102 Mg achieved by increasing pool stage by 0.5 m would be equivalent to installing nearly 650 edge-of-field practices in the watershed. Although more work is needed to integrate with an existing environmental pool management plan, study results indicate that reservoir management could achieve N reductions at a novel landscape scale.

Quantifying the contribution of tile drainage to basin-scale water yield using analytical and numerical models.

The Des Moines Lobe (DML) of north-central Iowa has been artificially drained by subsurface drains and surface ditches to provide some of the most productive agricultural land in the world. Herein we report on the use of end-member mixing analysis (EMMA) models and the numerical model Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to quantify the contribution of tile drainage to basin-scale water yields at various scales within the 2370 km2 Boone River watershed (BRW), a subbasin within the Des Moines River watershed. EMMA and SWAT methods suggested that tile drainage provided approximately 46 to 54% of annual discharge in the Boone River and during the March to June period, accounted for a majority of flow in the river. In the BRW subbasin of Lyons Creek, approximately 66% of the annual flow was sourced from tile drainage. Within the DML region, tile drainage contributes to basin-scale water yields at scales ranging from 40 to 16,000 km2, with downstream effects diminishing with increasing watershed size. Developing a better understanding of water sources contributing to river discharge is needed if mitigation and control strategies are going to be successfully targeted to reduce downstream nutrient export.

Agricultural conservation practices in Iowa watersheds: comparing actual implementation with practice potential.

As part of the solution to reduce the size of the Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, the state of Iowa has created the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy (INRS) to reduce total nitrogen and phosphorous loads by 45% by 2035. A major component of the strategy is implementation of conservation practices to reduce loads of non-point source pollution from agricultural lands. To identify potential locations for conservation practices in Iowa watersheds, the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF) is being used. In addition, the location of existing implemented practices are being identified by the Iowa Best Management Practices Mapping Project (IBMP). From these two products, a methodology was developed to compare the differences between actual implementation and practice placement potential. The compared conservation practices are grassed waterways, wetlands and ponds, and water and sediment control basins (WASCOBs). The comparison is performed in three hydrologic unit code 12 (HUC-12) watersheds in three distinct landform regions of Iowa. Analyses show that grassed waterways are widely implemented (at least 78% of the potential) in the three watersheds. For ponds and wetlands, the majority of the existing structures were smaller than the ACPF potential wetlands (average drainage area between 7 and 20 ha compared to between 89 and 109 ha). WASCOB implementation was only present in one watershed, most likely due to regional differences in conservation preferences. Coupled together the IBMP and ACPF will be important for stakeholders of watersheds in planning future investment and advancing towards a more systems-based approach to conservation.