Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 10(11)2021 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34827234

ABSTRACT

Dalbavancin is a new antibiotic that is effective against Gram-positive microorganisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococci, and offers the possibility of administering intravenous therapy once weekly in an ambulatory setting. We conducted a multicenter observational case-control study, comparing all patients who received dalbavancin (cases) with hospitalized patients who were treated instead with daptomycin, linezolid or vancomycin (controls), based on clinical diagnosis, main microorganism involved, and age. The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay after starting the study antimicrobial. Secondary outcomes were 7-day and 30-day efficacy, 30-day mortality, 90-day recurrence, 90-day and 6-month hospitalization, presence of adverse events and healthcare-associated infections; 161 patients (44 cases and 117 controls) were included. Bivariate analysis showed that dalbavancin reduced the total length of hospital stay (p < 0.001), with fewer 90-day recurrences (p = 0.005), 6-month hospitalizations related to the same infection (p = 0.004) and non-related hospitalizations (p = 0.035). Multivariate analyses showed that length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in patients treated with dalbavancin (-12.05 days 95% CI [-17.00, -7.11], p < 0.001), and 30-day efficacy was higher in the dalbavancin group (OR 2.62 95% CI [1.07, 6.37], p = 0.034). Although sample size of the study may be a limitation, we can conclude that Dalbavancin is a useful antimicrobial drug against Gram-positive infections, including multidrug-resistant pathogens, and allows for a remarkable reduction in length of hospital stay with greater 30-day efficacy.

2.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 18(1): 30, 2019 Oct 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31629409

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the effectiveness of dalbavancin (DBV) in clinical practice as consolidation therapy in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) and/or infective endocarditis (IE) produced by gram-positive cocci (GPC), as well as its safety and pharmacoeconomic impact. METHODS: A multicentre, observational and retrospective study was conducted of hospitalised patients with IE and/or BSI produced by GPC who received at least one dose of DBV. Clinical response was assessed during hospitalization, at 3 months and at 1 year. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients with median age of 73 years were enrolled; 73.5% were male; 59.04% had BSI and 49.04% IE (44.04% prosthetic valve IE, 32.4% native IE, 23.5% pacemaker lead). The most frequently isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus aureus in BSI (49%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci in IE (44.1%). All patients with IE were clinically cured in hospital; at 12 months, there was 2.9% loss to follow-up, 8.8% mortality unrelated to IE, and 2.9% therapeutic failure rate. The percentage effectiveness of DBV to treat IE was 96.7%. The clinical cure rate for BSI was 100% during hospital stay and at 3 months; there were no recurrences or deaths during the follow-up. No patient discontinued treatment for adverse events. The saving in hospital stay was 636 days for BSI (315,424.20€) and 557 days for IE (283,187.45€). CONCLUSIONS: DBV is an effective consolidation antibiotic therapy in clinically stabilized patients with IE and/or BSI. It proved to be a cost-effective treatment, reducing the hospital stay, thanks to the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of this drug.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Sepsis/drug therapy , Teicoplanin/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Teicoplanin/adverse effects , Teicoplanin/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
3.
Shock ; 50(5): 504-510, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29293175

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The integrated analysis of changes in the metabolic profile could be critical for the discovery of biomarkers of lung injury, and also for generating new pathophysiological hypotheses and designing novel therapeutic targets for the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This study aimed at developing a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based approach for the identification of the metabolomic profile of ARDS in patients with H1N1 influenza virus pneumonia. METHODS: Serum samples from 30 patients (derivation set) diagnosed of H1N1 influenza virus pneumonia were analyzed by unsupervised principal component analysis to identify metabolic differences between patients with and without ARDS by NMR spectroscopy. A predictive model of partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was developed for the identification of ARDS. PLS-DA was trained with the derivation set and tested in another set of samples from 26 patients also diagnosed of H1N1 influenza virus pneumonia (validation set). RESULTS: Decreased serum glucose, alanine, glutamine, methylhistidine and fatty acids concentrations, and elevated serum phenylalanine and methylguanidine concentrations, discriminated patients with ARDS versus patients without ARDS. PLS-DA model successfully identified the presence of ARDS in the validation set with a success rate of 92% (sensitivity 100% and specificity 91%). The classification functions showed a good correlation with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (R = 0.74, P < 0.0001) and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (R = 0.41, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The serum metabolomic profile is sensitive and specific to identify ARDS in patients with H1N1 influenza A pneumonia. Future studies are needed to determine the role of NMR spectroscopy as a biomarker of ARDS.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza, Human/metabolism , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy/methods , Metabolomics/methods , Pneumonia/metabolism , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
4.
Biomed Res Int ; 2014: 291031, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25009813

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Early studies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) reported increased incidence of tuberculosis. The tuberculin skin test (TST) is the technique of choice to detect latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) but has several limitations. OBJECTIVES: We compared TST and the newer T.SPOT.TB test to diagnose LTBI in SLE patients. METHODS: In this observational cohort study conducted between August 2009 and February 2012, we recruited 92 patients from those attending the SLE clinic of our university hospital. Data recorded were epidemiological and sociodemographic characteristics. Laboratory analyses included TST and T.SPOT.TB tests. RESULTS: Of the patients studied, 92% were women with an average age of 42.7 years. Overall, the degree of correlation between the two tests was low (Kappa index = 0.324) but was better in patients not receiving corticosteroids (CTC)/immunosuppressive (IS) therapy (Kappa = 0.436) and in those receiving hydroxychloroquine (Kappa = 0.473). While TST results were adversely affected by those receiving CTC and/or IS drugs (P = 0.021), the T.SPOT.TB results were not. CONCLUSION: Although the TST test remains a useful tool for diagnosing LTBI in SLE patients, the T.SPOT.TB test is perhaps better employed when the patient is receiving CTC and/or IS drugs.


Subject(s)
Latent Tuberculosis/complications , Latent Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Tuberculin Test/instrumentation , Tuberculin Test/methods , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
5.
Reumatol. clín. (Barc.) ; 9(6): 369-372, nov.-dic. 2013. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-116222

ABSTRACT

En la actualidad se ha detectado un aumento en la incidencia de pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) debido fundamentalmente a un diagnóstico más precoz, e incremento en la supervivencia de estos. La tuberculosis en nuestro país es una de las enfermedades infecciosas más prevalentes; como causa subyacente, entre otras, estarían la infección por VIH y el aumento de inmigrantes procedentes de áreas con alta prevalencia tuberculosa; este fenómeno es verdaderamente importante en los pacientes con enfermedades autoinmunes, ya que la presentación clínica, intensidad y pronóstico de la tuberculosis suelen ser diferentes a los de los pacientes inmunocompetentes. Los estudios sobre tuberculosis en paciente con LES son escasos y poco concluyentes, habiendo hoy en día muchas dudas sobre la realización o no de profilaxis tuberculosa en esta población y sin haberse establecido aún un protocolo de actuación por falta de estudios concluyentes al respecto. Las nuevas técnicas de diagnóstico de infección tuberculosa (IGRA) podrían ser útiles en esta población debido a su mayor sensibilidad respecto al Mantoux, evitando también los falsos negativos del mismo (AU)


There has recently been an increase in the incidence of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) due mainly to earlier diagnosis, and increased survival. Tuberculosis in our country is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases, and one of the underlying causes would be HIV infection and increased immigration from areas with high tuberculosis prevalence; this phenomenon is truly important in patients with autoimmune diseases, as clinical presentation, severity and prognosis of tuberculosis are often different to that of immunocompetent patients. Studies of tuberculosis in patients with SLE are scarce and inconclusive, with many doubts existing about the performance or non-tuberculous prophylaxis in this population and the absence of a protocol due to lack of conclusive studies. New techniques for diagnosis of tuberculosis (IGRAs) may be useful in this population due to higher sensitivity than Mantoux, helping avoid false negatives (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/epidemiology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/prevention & control , Early Diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/physiopathology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/therapy , Tuberculosis/complications , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/complications , Retrospective Studies
6.
Reumatol Clin ; 9(6): 369-72, 2013.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23102827

ABSTRACT

There has recently been an increase in the incidence of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) due mainly to earlier diagnosis, and increased survival. Tuberculosis in our country is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases, and one of the underlying causes would be HIV infection and increased immigration from areas with high tuberculosis prevalence; this phenomenon is truly important in patients with autoimmune diseases, as clinical presentation, severity and prognosis of tuberculosis are often different to that of immunocompetent patients. Studies of tuberculosis in patients with SLE are scarce and inconclusive, with many doubts existing about the performance or non-tuberculous prophylaxis in this population and the absence of a protocol due to lack of conclusive studies. New techniques for diagnosis of tuberculosis (IGRAs) may be useful in this population due to higher sensitivity than Mantoux, helping avoid false negatives.


Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Tuberculosis/etiology , Humans , Spain/epidemiology , Tuberculosis/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...