Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(7): NP476-NP485, 2024 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38489829

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing popularity, the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers for the correction of dark under-eye shadows remains challenging. Specific guidance on patient assessment is limited. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a stepwise assessment framework for lower eyelid dark shadows to help practitioners classify patients based on their underlying problems and facilitate a more strategic approach to treatment. METHODS: Literature review and peer collaboration informed the current availability of educational material for use by experienced injectors when assessing patients presenting with dark circles. A practitioner survey provided insight into current practices. A focus group convened to review the survey results and discuss best practice approaches to patient assessment. RESULTS: Surveyed practitioners (n = 39) reported patient concern about under-eye hollows (91%), dark eye circles (80%), and looking tired (60%). All (100%) agreed that midcheek volume was critical when treating tear-trough depression, and only 26% reported use of a tear-trough classification system. The focus group developed a framework for assessing tear-trough depression and the lid-cheek junction in patients presenting with dark circles. Key factors within this framework included the importance of appropriate lighting when conducting a visual inspection, regional inspection of the cheek and tear trough, palpation of the orbital rim and soft tissues, determination of the orbital vector, and assessment of lower eyelid pigmentation and skin quality. CONCLUSIONS: Careful step-by-step assessment can reduce the challenges of treating dark circles by identifying patients in whom dark eye circles may be improved without the need to directly inject filler into the tear trough.


Subject(s)
Cheek , Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Eyelids , Hyaluronic Acid , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Focus Groups , Skin Aging
2.
Aesthet Surg J ; 43(6): NP438-NP448, 2023 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36759325

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of delayed-onset tissue nodules (DTNs) due to hyaluronic acid (HA) injections is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To formulate a rational theory for DTN development and their avoidance and treatment. METHODS: A multidisciplinary and multicountry DTN consensus panel was established, with 20 questions posed and consensus sought. Consensus was set at 75% agreement. RESULTS: Consensus was reached in 16 of 20 questions regarding the pathogenesis of DTNs, forming the basis for a classification and treatment guide. CONCLUSIONS: The group believes that filler, pathogens, and inflammation are all involved in DTNs and that DTNs most likely are infection initiated with a variable immune response. Injected filler may incorporate surface bacteria, either a commensal or a true pathogen, if the skin barrier is altered. The initially high molecular weight HA filler is degraded to low molecular weight HA (LMWHA) at the edge of the filler. Commensals positioned within the filler bolus may be well tolerated until the filler is degraded and the commensal becomes visible to the immune system. LMWHA is particularly inflammatory in the presence of any local bacteria. Commensals may still be tolerated unless the immune system is generally heightened by viremia or vaccination. Systemic pathogenic bacteremia may also interact with the filler peripheral LMWHA, activating Toll-like receptors that induce DTN formation. Given this scenario, attention to practitioner and patient hygiene and early systemic infection treatment deserve attention. Classification and treatment systems were devised by considering each of the 3 factors-filler, inflammation, and infection-separately.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Injections , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Inflammation/etiology , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects
3.
Aesthet Surg J ; 40(9): 1009-1021, 2020 08 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31693068

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid fillers have a satisfactory safety profile. However, adverse reactions do occur, and rarely intravascular injection may lead to blindness. Currently there is no internationally recognized consensus on the prevention or management of blindness from hyaluronic acid filler. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to give guidance on how to minimize the risk and optimize the management of this rare but catastrophic adverse reaction. METHODS: A multinational group of experts in cosmetic injectables from multiple disciplines convened to review current best practice and develop updated consensus recommendations for prevention and bedside intervention if visual loss occurs after cosmetic injection of hyaluronic acid filler. RESULTS: The consensus group provided specific recommendations focusing on the consenting process, prevention, and early management of visual impairment related to intravascular hyaluronic acid filler injection. CONCLUSIONS: Although visual loss due to filler injections is rare, it is important that both patient and physician be aware of this risk. In this paper the authors describe methods and techniques available to reduce the risk and also document suggested initial management should a clinician find themselves in this situation.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Blindness/chemically induced , Blindness/prevention & control , Consensus , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...