Lipoprotein apheresis standard for apheresis competence centers--an updated synthesis and amendment to pre-existing standards.

With several techniques of selective apheresis treatment, some of which have been established for over 30 years, severe and pharmacologically unmanageable dyslipidemia can be treated successfully. The long-term lowering of LDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) by 60-80 percent, together with pleiotropic effects, allow for significant risk reduction in otherwise progressive chronic atherosclerotic disease, i.e. chronic coronary artery disease in most apheresis patients, and improvement of quality of life. For various reasons, worldwide only an estimated 2500 patients, among them 1400 to 1500 in Germany, are regularly treated by apheresis. This relatively small number of apheresis patients in Germany is being cared for in more than 200 centers, by more than 750 physicians approved for extracorporeal treatment, resulting in unraveling of expertise and diversity of treatment strategies instead of the needed concentration. Here we present a comprehensive standard for competence centers in apheresis treatment, which is an updated synthesis and amendment to previously published standards, based on the experience from more than 30,000 apheresis treatments in our own center. The presented standard provides a guideline for apheresis treatments, comprising all procedures, indications, detailing the application procedure, as well as suggestions for supportive care in extracorporeal therapy. In the absence of large studies of sufficient quality, this standard represents our "good clinical practice" and refers the "best available evidence", providing the indispensable basis for working in an apheresis center. The apheresis standard also aims to contribute to quality assurance, another intention is to increase the acceptance of this valuable treatment, with a view to admitting more patients in need to apheresis programs, on the basis of reliable cost reimbursement.

Immunoadsorption in steroid-refractory multiple sclerosis: clinical experience in 60 patients.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common autoimmune inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system with a frequently relapsing or progressive course. For steroid-resistant relapse, plasma exchange (PE) has been established as guidelines-recommended treatment option. While PE is a non-selective extracorporeal blood purification process with elimination of plasma and subsequent substitution, immunoadsorption (IA) is a selective technique for the removal of autoantibodies and immune complexes with less adverse effects. So far there are only few reports on the treatment of MS by IA. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the efficacy and safety of IA as an escalation therapy in MS patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients with steroid-refractory MS relapse were treated by IA and analyzed retrospectively. Patients received six standardized IA sessions using a non-regenerable tryptophan immunoadsorber, at average 58 days after first indications of relapse. The treated plasma volume was two liters per IA session. Outcome was measured as improvement in relapse symptoms. From the pilot phase of the study comprising the first fourteen patients, detailed neurological examinations before and after IA such as Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Functional System Score (FS) and visual acuity are reported. Of the following 46 patients, only qualitative data regarding the therapeutic success, and in addition clinical data on tolerability, are presently available. RESULTS: In 53 of 60 patients clinically relevant improvement of the main symptom of MS relapse was noted after IA, there was no change in six patients, deterioration in one. This corresponds to a response rate of 88%. Symptomatic improvement was first registered on average after the third IA. 87.5% of patients could be treated through a peripheral venous access. Only 12.5% needed a central venous catheter. In four of 396 single treatments (1%) significant complications occurred, mild side effects or discomfort were registered 16 times (4%). If peripheral venous access was chosen, missed puncture or puncture hematoma occurred in 22 cases (5.5%). CONCLUSION: Immunoadsorption for the treatment of steroid-refractory MS relapse is safe and effective. The response rate was 88% and non-inferior to previous results with plasma exchange. Due to good tolerability, the treatment with immunoadsorption, which is usually possible through a peripheral venous access, can be performed on an outpatient basis.

Indication and implementation of lipidapheresis, rheopheresis, or immunoadsorption (lessons learnt from Germany's largest apheresis center).

Efficient modes of extracorporeal blood purification are available today for apheresis treatment of progressive atherosclerosis, autoimmune disease, or for improving hemorheology. Advanced technology and sophisticated care render apheresis treatment selective, safe and tolerable. Our task is to constantly update indications for apheresis based on best evidence available and good clinical practice, as well as, to determine how apheresis therapy can be made available to those in need or with otherwise refractory disease. Presenting examples of lipid apheresis, rheopheresis, or immunoadsorption for treatment of hypercholesterolemia, hyperlipoproteinemia (a), acute hearing loss, refractory or exacerbating multiple sclerosis, we highlight real world obstacles for implementation of treatment, resulting in still too many patients with proven or recommended indication left untreated. Based on the experience of the largest apheresis center in Germany, with more than 3,300 treatments per year, we depict the necessary structure for identification of patients, defining indication, referral, implementation of therapy, and reimbursement. Apheresis is unfamiliar to most patients and many practitioners or consultants. Nephrologists, performing >90% of apheresis treatments in Germany, have to form a network for referral comprising all regional care-givers, general practitioners as well as the respective specialists (mainly, cardiologists, endocrinologists, diabetologists, ORL specialists, neurologists, ophthalmologists, or rheumatologists), and insurances or other cost-bearing parties for offering a scientifically approved therapeutic regimen and comprehensive care. We have realized this concept in a high volume apheresis center acting in a closely knit network characterized by an unrelenting effort at ongoing medical education. As a consequence, we include approximately 10 times more patients with appropriate diagnoses in our apheresis program as compared to the national average.