Relations of left ventricular mass and systolic function to endothelial function and coronary flow reserve in healthy, new discovered hypertensive subjects.

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is prognostically relevant, associated with major cardiovascular risk factors and with atherosclerosis. However, whether LVH is independently associated with impaired coronary flow reserve (CFR) and with endothelial dysfunction is disputed. We assessed the relationship of LV mass and systolic function to CFR and endothelial function in new discovered never treated subjects with essential arterial hypertension, but without coronary artery disease or microalbuminuria. LVH, ejection fraction (EF) and stress-corrected midwall shortening (MWS, a measure of myocardial contractility) were assessed by echocardiography. CFR was assessed by single-photon emission computed tomography and dipyridamole infusion. Endothelial function was evaluated by assessing 1-min postischaemic flow-mediated dilatation of the brachial artery (FMD); nitroglycerine-mediated dilatation (NMD) of the same brachial artery was used as measure of nonendothelium-dependent vasodilatation. In approximately 1 year, we enrolled 21 subjects who met stringent inclusion criteria (47+/-10 years old, 26.6+/-2.8 kg/m2, 78% men). Five patients showed LVH. Multivariate analyses showed a significant negative correlation of LV mass index with FMD (beta=-0.61, P<0.05) but not with NMD, neither with CFR. Stress-corrected MWS showed independent correlation with CFR (beta=0.51, P<0.05). Thus, in clinically healthy, new discovered hypertensive subjects, never treated and mostly in the early stage of arterial hypertension, LVH can be associated with endothelial dysfunction while maximal dipyridamole- dependent CFR may be preserved; nevertheless, a cardiac phenotype presenting with tendency to impaired myocardial contractility, assessed by stress-corrected MWS, showed association with lower CFR in the early stage of arterial hypertension.

Citizens and family doctors facing awareness and management of traditional cardiovascular risk factors: results from the Global Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Project (Help Your Heart Stay Young Study).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The numerous guidelines and multiple approaches to managing cardiovascular risk factors have reduced the number of fatal events but not the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). One rarely explored aspect is the extent to which individuals perceive their own risk in relation to their education and history of CVD. Furthermore, Italy has a State-based Health System, in which family doctors (FDs) may be an extremely useful and relatively low cost resource for risk management, but the degree of their involvement in individual CVD risk management has not been previously assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine of Federico II University, Naples, Italy, and the Neapolitan Section of the Italian Society of Family Doctors (SIMG), developed an epidemiological survey to evaluate the level and awareness of CVD risk in subjects in the urban area of Naples, and the degree of involvement of FDs in CVD risk management. During a period of a few months, the subjects who visited their FDs were invited to respond to a standard self-explanatory questionnaire, and the FDs were required to provide quantitative information concerning the CVD risk factors of each enrolled subject from their databases in order to assess global CVD risk. The data included cholesterol and blood pressure (BP) levels, and had to be collected within six months of the visit; if the date were missing, the fact was recorded. The present analysis was based on data concerning the 5,687 subjects who had entered the study by January 2002, 7.6% of whom reported CVD (myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, angina, cerebral transient ischemic attack: CD+) and 92.4% did not (CVD-). MI was the most frequent CVD, and 18% of the CVD+ cases reported more than one non-fatal cardiovascular event. On average, the CVD+ subjects were older and more often men. After adjusting for age and FD, they also had a higher body mass index (BMI) and prevalence of obesity, higher self-reported BP, a lower education level, and more often referred high cholesterol levels, hypertension and diabetes. On the contrary, the proportion of smokers was higher in the CVD- group. Among the subjects who declared that they did not have a high cholesterol level, 11% reported recent values of > 200 mg/dL. The FDs of 36% of the cases were unable to assess the individual global CV risk level using quantitative data from their electronic databases. The most frequently missing information was the level of total cholesterol. Missing data were more frequent in the CVD- than the CVD+ subjects, regardless of age and FD. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that the awareness of CVD risk among subjects is somewhat vague. The FDs were generally able to provide a quantitative assessment of CVD risk in their patients. CVD risk prevention programmes may be more successful if they stress knowledge and awareness in the population, and stimulate FDs to undertake more stringent quantitative assessments of CVD risk factors.