Spatializing HIV: Putting Queer (men) in its place via social marketing.

The current study is concerned with how HIV is spatialized, or emplaced in everyday life, and therefore how prevention, Queer identity, and the virus itself are given meaning. Employing a transdisciplinary methodology based in Critical Discourse Studies and critical human geography, this study provides a geosemiotic analysis of an HIV prevention social marketing effort called the Little Prick campaign. Findings showed that space was constructed through multiple competing dynamics across professionals and citizens, as well as amidst contested notions of risk and branding in the epidemic. The analysis illuminates the discursive relationship amongst Queer, HIV, and prevention. Equally, this study counters the biased notion that "prevention fatigue" in high-risk populations hampers professional labor by, instead, exposing a semiotic fatigue in the HIV epidemic and prevention efforts.

HIV Stress Exchange: Queer Men, Intergenerational Stress, and Intimacy Amidst the Time of HIV.

HIV remains a principal inequity for queer men across the United States. Biomedical practices all but dominate interventions, and HIV-related stress persists among queer men. Regarding HIV as discourse is not well represented in prevention and care. This study is a response, then, to this need that seeks to build an HIV-informed model of praxis, entitled HIV Stress Exchange. A Queer Discourse Study was conducted with 20 queer men across two generations, pre-AIDS and post-AIDS. The data included in-depth interviews and material resources participants brought to the conversation. In all, this data speaks to the ways in which HIV is given life in discourse and what meaning it holds in embodied lives. Resultantly, five themes materialized, inclusive of all ages and sero-statuses: HIV provided meaning as in-/validated, un-/voiced, un-/intelligible, holding intimacy/-ies, and being PrEP/-ared. Based on the findings, the conceptual model for HIV Stress Exchange is presented along with an HIV-informed model of practice.

Decriminalizing LGBTQ+: Reproducing and resisting mental health inequities.

Secure settings are not queer because lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, Two Spirit, and asexual (LGBTQ+) people populate them, and neither are LGBTQ+ people inherently criminal because they are found in those spaces. Queer people bear disproportionate health, mental health, and social inequities that have had, historically and currently, the effect to criminalize them. This review discusses effective language and ideologies when working with LGBTQ+ people in secure settings. Major health, mental health, and social inequities are reviewed, along with the applied framework of minority stress. Then, the process of criminalization is diagrammed across the phases of predetainment, being in the system, and through re-entering the community. Finally, multilevel strategies are offered to decriminalize LGBTQ+ people ideologically and in practice.

Social Work Matters: Californians' Perceptions of Social Welfare.

This article reports on findings from a representative survey of Californians (N = 946) and their perception of social work and its professionals. Analysis of the survey data indicates that the public holds a generally positive view of social work and its "helping" nature, although social work is considered one of the least prestigious professions. Respondents primarily associated social work with child protection and behavioral health roles, and less often with tasks such as community organizing, promoting social justice, and crafting social policy. Implications are considered for renegotiating the identity of social work and foregrounding social justice.

They tell us "we don't belong in the world and we shouldn't take up a place": HIV discourse within two-spirit communities.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated how HIV discourse is negotiated and given meaning in the lives of young, male two-spirit leaders, when considering their communities' and their own health and wellness. These menare also unique in that they have always lived under the specter and dominant discourse of HIV, that is, they are part of a second generation since the time of HIV/AIDS. METHODS: We conducted a Discourse Analysis of six qualitative interviews from the HONOR Project, a multi-site, mixed-methods study of the two-spirit community across the United States, foregrounding the relationships amongst trauma, coping, and health. RESULTS: HIV functions discursively in four ways, as a: shadow presence, professionalized identity, health sub-/priority, and vehicle for belonging and (re)claiming. CONCLUSIONS: This study is important to social work as well as HIV prevention and care as it affords voice to two-spirit men, a highly marginalized community and one often silenced in scientific discourse. And, it centralizes language and context, complicating social epidemiological characterizations of HIV/AIDS, risk, and historically traumatized populations.

Fetishizing the health sciences: Queer theory as an intervention.

Queer theory often falls impotent in its palatability across disciplinary lines. I offer a conceptual paper that interrogates the disease and divide when considering queer theory in and for the health sciences. In so doing, I look to foster a process of making queer theory more tenable to applied practice - and to make practice in social work, at least, more queer. The exemplar of HIV is deconstructed as a preeminent discourse and health disparity. In the end, it is argued that queer theory may be an essential intervention in the arsenal of the helping professions.

Regional differences among HIV patients in care: California medical monitoring project sites, 2007-2008.

INTRODUCTION: The Medical Monitoring Project (MMP) is a national, multi-site population-based supplemental HIV/AIDS surveillance project of persons receiving HIV/AIDS care. We compared California MMP data by region. Demographic characteristics, medical care experiences, HIV treatment, clinical care outcomes, and need for support services are described. METHODS: HIV-infected patients 18 years or older were randomly selected from medical care facilities. In person structured interviews from 2007 - 2008 were used to assess sociodemographic characteristics, self-reported clinical outcomes, and need for supportive services. Pearson chi-squared, Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis p-values were calculated to compare regional differences. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2008, 899 people were interviewed: 329 (37%) in San Francisco (SF), 333 (37%) in Los Angeles (LA) and 237 (26%) in other California counties. Significant regional sociodemographic differences were found. Care received and clinical outcomes for patients in MMP were positive and few regional differences were identified. HIV case management (36%), mental health counseling (35%), and dental services (29%) were the supportive services patients most frequently needed. Unmet needs for supportive services were low overall. Significant differences by region in needed and unmet need services were identified. DISCUSSION: The majority of MMP respondents reported standard of care CD4 and viral load monitoring, high treatment use, undetectable HIV viral loads and CD4 counts indicative of good immune function and treatment efficacy. Information from MMP can be used by planning councils, policymakers, and HIV care providers to improve access to care and prevention. Identifying regional differences can facilitate sharing of best practices among health jurisdictions.