ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intra-atrial right coronary artery (RCA) is a rare and generally asymptomatic anomaly of development of the coronary arteries. This malformation could potentially expose the patient to a catastrophic outcome in the case of injury during interventional or surgical procedures. Currently, only a few case reports and no systematic reviews are available in the literature. CASE SUMMARY: We report the case of a 54-year-old man with atypical chest pain who underwent multi-detector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA). The exam revealed no significant coronary artery stenoses; however, an intra-atrial course of mid RCA was evident. Medical therapy was administered, and the patient was discharged to home without undergoing a conventional angiography. Previously reported autoptic and clinical cases were retrieved from the PubMed literature database to compare the clinicopathological features of this case. CONCLUSION: MDCTA depicted the abnormal course of the coronary artery in this patient as an intra-atrial course of the mid RCA. Finding this abnormality was crucial to avoid an inadvertent injury during interventional or surgical procedures.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Conflicting data were reported about normalization of sizes of right chambers, systolic and diastolic function and prevalence of arrhythmias after ostium secundum atrial septal defect closure. We sought to compare surgical and percutaneous approaches in terms of arrhythmias, right chamber volumes, and function at long-term follow-up. METHODS: In all, 107 patients were enrolled, all corrected at pediatric age. Forty-four of them were treated surgically with a right thoracotomy approach and 63 were treated percutaneously. All patients underwent a standard echocardiogram and electrocardiographic Holter examinations. RESULTS: No difference was detected between the two groups regarding right atrial or ventricular volumes. The global right ventricular function assessed by fractional area change was similar between the two groups. However, the longitudinal function and the diastolic function were significantly impaired in the surgical group (tricuspid annulus peak systolic excursion 23.7 ± 4.5 mm versus 18.7 ± 3.5 mm, p < 0.001; S' wave 13.7 ± 3.1 cm/s versus 9.8 ± 2.4 cm/s, p < 0.001; E/E' 4.7 ± 1.7 versus 7.1 ± 2.9, p < 0.001). There was a low incidence of supraventricular couples or runs, but slightly higher in the surgical group (6.8% versus 1.6%), although not statistically significant. No echocardiographic variable related to ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmic events. CONCLUSIONS: Either surgical or percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect have a similar efficacy on the volume normalization of the right chamber. Modern surgical techniques have a limited impact on the systolic and diastolic function as well as on the arrhythmic risk; however, the right ventricular longitudinal and diastolic function seems to be better preserved in the percutaneous group.
