Decision analysis supports the use of drain amylase-based enhanced recovery method after esophagectomy.

Postesophagectomy anastomotic leak is a common postsurgical complication. The current standard method of detecting leak is esophagram usually late in the postoperative period. Perianastomotic drain amylase level had shown promising results in early detection anastomosis leak. Previous studies have shown that postoperative day 4 amylase level is more specific and sensitive than esophagram. The purpose of this study is to determine if implementing a drain amylase-based screening method for anastomotic leak can reduce length of stay and hospital cost relative to a traditional esophagram-based pathway. The drain amylase protocol we propose uses postoperative day 4 drain amylase level to direct the initiation of PO intake and discharge. We designed a decision analysis tree using TreeAge Pro software to compare the drain amylase-based screening method to the standard of care, the esophagram. We performed a retrospective review of postesophagectomy patients from a tertiary academic medical center (University hospital Cleveland medical center) where amylase level was measured routinely postoperatively. The patients were separated into amylase-based pathway group and the standard of care group based on their postop management. The length of stay, costs, complications, and leak rate of these two groups were used to inform the decision analysis tree. In the base-case analysis, the decision analysis demonstrated that an amylase-based screening method can reduce the hospital stay by one day and reduced costs by ∼$3,000 compared to esophagram group. To take the variability of the data into consideration, we performed a Monte Carlo simulation. The result showed again a median saving of 0.71 days and ∼$2,500 per patient in hospital cost. A ballistic sensitivity analysis was performed to show that the sensitivity of postoperative day 4 amylase level in detecting a leak was the most important factor in the model. We conclude that implementing an amylase-based screening method for anastomotic leak in postesophagectomy patient can significantly reduce hospital cost and length of stay. This study demonstrates a novel protocol to improve postesophagectomy care. Based on this result, we believe a prospective multicenter study is appropriate.

Suture-line reinforcement with glutaraldehyde-preserved bovine pericardium for nonanatomic resection of lung tissue.

In this study we assessed the usefulness of glutaraldehyde-preserved bovine pericardium (GPBP), preparated in our laboratory, in nonanatomic resection of lung tissue in dogs. A 30% resection of the right cranial lobe of the lung was performed in 18 mongrel dogs. The suture line was reinforced with GPBP strips. For group I (n = 6), the GPBP strips were fixed on the lung with nonabsorbable suture by thoracotomy. In Group II (n = 6), the resection and fixation of the GPBP strips were performed with an endoscopic linear stapler by thoracotomy. In Group III (n = 6), the resection and fixation of the GPBP strips were performed with a linear stapler by thoracoscopy. The animals were evaluated each day during the first week after surgery and every other day during the study time. At the end of the study all animals were euthanized with an overdose of pentobarbital. Macroscopic and microscopic examinations of the bioprosthesis and lung were evaluated. All animals survived the surgical procedure and study time (8 weeks). In the three groups, macroscopic examination of the bioprosthesis showed good adaptation to the lung tissue. Microscopically, all groups of animals presented good healing, with the presence of fibrotic tissue layer on the GPBP and its periphery as well as in the lung. However, in group I we observed the presence of giant cells in the suture line. GPBP proved to be a useful material for reinforcement of the nonanatomic resection suture line of lung tissue in dogs.